World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
3748
World Ranking
14112
National Ranking
5589

Philip Brisk publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Brisk sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 181 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Philip Brisk D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Brisk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Philip Brisk is affiliated with the University of California, Riverside in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of engineering and computer science, with a notable emphasis on biomedical engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, and artificial intelligence. Additional specialized subfields include ocean engineering and signal processing.

Their scientific work is concentrated around several main topics:

  • Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
  • Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
  • Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics

Philip Brisk has contributed to numerous publications in notable venues, including:

  • IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
  • PLoS ONE
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems
  • IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Philip Brisk include:

  • "A pneumatic random-access memory for controlling soft robots," 2021, PLoS ONE
  • "The Matrix Profile in Seismology: Template Matching of Everything With Everything," 2024, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • "FPGA-based Acceleration of Time Series Similarity Prediction: From Cloud to Edge," 2022, ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems
  • "Multi-Objective Design Automation for Microfluidic Capture Chips," 2022, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience
  • "ChemStor: Using Formal Methods To Guarantee Safe Storage and Disposal of Chemicals," 2020, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Collaborations are a significant part of their research activities. Frequent coauthors include William H. Grover, Shane Hoang, Konstantinos Karydis, Mabel Shehada, and Zachary Zimmerman.

Philip Brisk's professional recognitions include being named an ACM Senior Member in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Variable latency speculative addition: a new paradigm for arithmetic circuit design

    Ajay K. Verma;Philip Brisk;Paolo Ienne

  • Matrix Profile II: Exploiting a Novel Algorithm and GPUs to Break the One Hundred Million Barrier for Time Series Motifs and Joins

    Yan Zhu;Zachary Zimmerman;Nader Shakibay Senobari;Chin-Chia Michael Yeh

  • Instruction generation and regularity extraction for reconfigurable processors

    Philip Brisk;Adam Kaplan;Ryan Kastner;Majid Sarrafzadeh

  • Area-efficient instruction set synthesis for reconfigurable system-on-chip designs

    Philip Brisk;Adam Kaplan;Majid Sarrafzadeh

  • Recent developments in microfluidic large scale integration.

    Ismail Emre Araci;Philip Brisk

  • A first step towards automatic application of power analysis countermeasures

    Ali Galip Bayrak;Francesco Regazzoni;Philip Brisk;Francois-Xavier Standaert

  • Path scheduling on digital microfluidic biochips

    Daniel Grissom;Philip Brisk

  • Efficient synthesis of compressor trees on FPGAs

    Hadi Parandeh-Afshar;Philip Brisk;Paolo Ienne

  • A Design Flow and Evaluation Framework for DPA-Resistant Instruction Set Extensions

    Francesco Regazzoni;Alessandro Cevrero;François-Xavier Standaert;Stephane Badel

  • An open-source compiler and PCB synthesis tool for digital microfluidic biochips

    Daniel Grissom;Christopher Curtis;Skyler Windh;Calvin Phung

  • Exploiting fast carry-chains of FPGAs for designing compressor trees

    Hadi Parandeh-Afshar;Philip Brisk;Paolo Ienne

  • Fast Online Synthesis of Digital Microfluidic Biochips

    Daniel T. Grissom;Philip Brisk

  • Rethinking custom ISE identification: a new processor-agnostic method

    Ajay K. Verma;Philip Brisk;Paolo Ienne

  • Adaptive and fault tolerant medical vest for life-critical medical monitoring

    Roozbeh Jafari;Foad Dabiri;Philip Brisk;Majid Sarrafzadeh

  • Fast online synthesis of generally programmable digital microfluidic biochips

    Daniel Grissom;Philip Brisk

  • Data-Flow Transformations to Maximize the Use of Carry-Save Representation in Arithmetic Circuits

    A.K. Verma;P. Brisk;P. Ienne

  • A digital microfluidic biochip synthesis framework

    Daniel Grissom;Kenneth O'Neal;Benjamin Preciado;Hiral Patel

  • Matrix Profile XIV: Scaling Time Series Motif Discovery with GPUs to Break a Quintillion Pairwise Comparisons a Day and Beyond

    Zachary Zimmerman;Kaveh Kamgar;Nader Shakibay Senobari;Brian Crites

  • A field-programmable pin-constrained digital microfluidic biochip

    Daniel Grissom;Philip Brisk

  • Finding the optimal design of a passive microfluidic mixer.

    Junchao Wang;Junchao Wang;Naiyin Zhang;Jin Chen;Victor G. J. Rodgers

  • Compressor tree synthesis on commercial high-performance FPGAs

    Hadi Parandeh-Afshar;Arkosnato Neogy;Philip Brisk;Paolo Ienne

  • Selective Flexibility: Creating Domain-Specific Reconfigurable Arrays

    Mirjana Stojilovic;David Novo;Lazar Saranovac;Philip Brisk

Frequent Co-Authors

Paolo Ienne
Paolo Ienne École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Majid Sarrafzadeh
Majid Sarrafzadeh University of California, Los Angeles
Eamonn Keogh
Eamonn Keogh University of California, Riverside
Edoardo Charbon
Edoardo Charbon École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Yusuf Leblebici
Yusuf Leblebici École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Francesco Regazzoni
Francesco Regazzoni Polytechnic University of Milan
Ryan Kastner
Ryan Kastner University of California, San Diego
François-Xavier Standaert
François-Xavier Standaert Université Catholique de Louvain
Roozbeh Jafari
Roozbeh Jafari Texas A&M University
Philip D. Rack
Philip D. Rack University of Tennessee at Knoxville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of related fields with growing career opportunities. For students seeking flexibility, pursuing an online degree for mechanical engineering is a great option, combining technical skills with design and problem-solving.

Those interested in analytical and scientific careers may consider a bachelor of science in physics online, a pathway to roles in research, technology, and engineering.

Data continues to shape the tech industry, making a cheapest data science degree a valuable credential for jobs in analytics, machine learning, and AI.

Alternatively, students can pursue accredited online electrical engineering programs to prepare for innovative roles in electronics, robotics, and telecommunications.

These related online degrees not only expand career options but also offer affordable and accredited pathways for those who require flexible study options.

Best Scientists Citing Philip Brisk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles