World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
42
Citations
15255
World Ranking
2011
National Ranking
239

Marcin T. Kacperczyk publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcin T. Kacperczyk sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 118 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Marcin T. Kacperczyk D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcin T. Kacperczyk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcin T. Kacperczyk is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily contributes to the fields of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, with a particular focus on subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Accounting, Strategy and Management, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment.

The main topics addressed in their work cover Climate Change Policy and Economics, Market Dynamics and Volatility, Financial Markets and Investment Strategies, Energy, Environment, Economic Growth, Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting, Corporate Finance and Governance, and Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds.

Kacperczyk's recent publications include several papers spanning from 2020 to 2023. These publications appeared in well-regarded journals and electronic repositories:

  • "Global Pricing of Carbon-Transition Risk" (2023) published in The Journal of Finance
  • "Carbon Emissions and the Bank-Lending Channel" (2021) published in SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Do Foreign Institutional Investors Improve Price Efficiency?" (2020) published in Review of Financial Studies
  • "Sustainable Finance" (2022) published in European Finance Review
  • "The Financial Cost of Carbon" (2022) published in Journal of applied corporate finance

The frequent publication venues for Kacperczyk's work include the SSRN Electronic Journal with nineteen publications, The Journal of Finance with three, Review of Financial Studies with two, European Finance Review with two, and the Journal of applied corporate finance with two publications.

Collaborations are a notable aspect of Kacperczyk's research activities. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Bolton with twenty joint works, Zachery Halem with five, Tianyu Wang with four, Joseph E. Aldy with three, and Jaromir Nosal with three.

Best Publications

  • The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets

    Harrison Hong;Marcin Kacperczyk

  • On the Industry Concentration of Actively Managed Equity Mutual Funds

    Marcin Kacperczyk;Clemens Sialm;L. U. Zheng

  • Unobserved Actions of Mutual Funds

    Marcin Kacperczyk;Clemens Sialm;Lu Zheng

  • Do Investors Care about Carbon Risk

    Patrick Bolton;Marcin Kacperczyk

  • Global Pricing of Carbon‐Transition Risk

    Unknown

  • Labor Unions, Operating Flexibility, and the Cost of Equity

    Huafeng Jason Chen;Marcin Kacperczyk;Hernán Ortiz-Molina

  • Competition and Bias

    Harrison Hong;Marcin Kacperczyk

  • Time-Varying Fund Manager Skill

    Marcin Kacperczyk;Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh;Laura Veldkamp

  • When Safe Proved Risky: Commercial Paper During the Financial Crisis of 2007-2009

    Marcin Kacperczyk;Philipp Schnabl

  • Fund Manager Use of Public Information: New Evidence on Managerial Skills

    Marcin Kacperczyk;Amit Seru

  • Time-Varying Fund Manager Skill: Time-Varying Fund Manager Skill

    Marcin Kacperczyk;Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh;Laura Veldkamp

  • Competition and Bias

    Harrison G. Hong;Harrison G. Hong;Marcin T. Kacperczyk;Marcin T. Kacperczyk

  • How Safe are Money Market Funds

    Marcin Kacperczyk;Philipp Schnabl

  • A Rational Theory of Mutual Funds' Attention Allocation

    Marcin Kacperczyk;Marcin Kacperczyk;Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh;Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh;Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh;Laura Veldkamp;Laura Veldkamp;Laura Veldkamp

  • The Price of Sin: The Effects of Social Norms on Markets

    Marcin T. Kacperczyk;Marcin T. Kacperczyk;Harrison G. Hong;Harrison G. Hong

  • The Unintended Consequences of the Zero Lower Bound Policy

    Marco Di Maggio;Marcin Kacperczyk

  • Do Nonfinancial Stakeholders Affect the Pricing of Risky Debt? Evidence from Unionized Workers

    Huafeng (Jason) Chen;Marcin Kacperczyk;Hernán Ortiz-Molina

  • On the Industry Concentration of Actively Managed Equity Mutual Funds

    Marcin T. Kacperczyk;Marcin T. Kacperczyk;Clemens Sialm;Clemens Sialm;Lu Zheng

  • Carbon Emissions and the Bank-Lending Channel

    Marcin T. Kacperczyk;Marcin T. Kacperczyk;José-Luis Peydró;José-Luis Peydró;José-Luis Peydró

  • Do Foreign Institutional Investors Improve Price Efficiency

    Marcin Kacperczyk;Savitar Sundaresan;Tianyu Wang

  • Unobserved Actions of Mutual Funds

    Marcin T. Kacperczyk;Marcin T. Kacperczyk;Clemens Sialm;Clemens Sialm;Lu Zheng

  • Investor Sophistication and Capital Income Inequality

    Marcin Kacperczyk;Jaromir B Nosal;Luminita Stevens

  • On the Industry Concentration of Actively Managed Equity Mutual Funds

    Marcin Kacperczyk;Clemens Sialm;Lu Zheng

  • Do Non-Financial Stakeholders Affect the Pricing of Risky Debt? Evidence from Unionized Workers

    Huafeng Chen;Marcin T. Kacperczyk;Marcin T. Kacperczyk;Hernan Ortiz-Molina

Frequent Co-Authors

Laura Veldkamp
Laura Veldkamp Columbia University
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh Columbia University
Philipp Schnabl
Philipp Schnabl New York University
Clemens Sialm
Clemens Sialm The University of Texas at Austin
Patrick Bolton
Patrick Bolton Imperial College London
Harrison G. Hong
Harrison G. Hong Columbia University
Amit Seru
Amit Seru Stanford University
José-Luis Peydró
José-Luis Peydró Guido Carli Free International University for Social Studies
Dirk Schoenmaker
Dirk Schoenmaker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Stephen G. Walker
Stephen G. Walker The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Economics and Finance in the USA opens doors to various online degrees and career pathways. For those interested in leadership roles, you may want to explore is project management a good degree. Project management skills are highly valued in financial institutions, offering versatile career options beyond traditional finance roles.

If you want to earn your degree quickly, an accelerated finance degree allows you to finish coursework faster—helping you enter the workforce or advance your career sooner. Similarly, fast track mba programs in finance and related fields can lead to advanced positions in a compressed time frame.

For those interested in accounting or support roles, a bookkeeping certification can provide foundational skills and quick entry into the financial sector. These pathways offer flexibility and specialization, helping you customize your education to match your career goals in the dynamic world of economics and finance.

Best Scientists Citing Marcin T. Kacperczyk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles