| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 56 | 4582 | 127 | 152 | 9294 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Peter W. Gage between 1964 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter W. Gage published across 53 years, from 1964 to 2016, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2000. 1 of the 185 publications appeared in the last two years.
185 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 3 |
| 1965 | 5 |
| 1966 | 5 |
| 1967 | 4 |
| 1968 | 4 |
| 1969 | 5 |
| 1970 | 1 |
| 1971 | 3 |
| 1972 | 1 |
| 1973 | 9 |
| 1974 | 2 |
| 1975 | 3 |
| 1976 | 6 |
| 1977 | 6 |
| 1978 | 4 |
| 1979 | 9 |
| 1980 | 6 |
| 1981 | 5 |
| 1982 | 5 |
| 1983 | 4 |
| 1984 | 4 |
| 1985 | 8 |
| 1986 | 2 |
| 1987 | 1 |
| 1988 | 7 |
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 5 |
| 1991 | 0 |
| 1992 | 5 |
| 1993 | 2 |
| 1994 | 1 |
| 1995 | 2 |
| 1996 | 8 |
| 1997 | 4 |
| 1998 | 4 |
| 1999 | 3 |
| 2000 | 10 |
| 2001 | 2 |
| 2002 | 4 |
| 2003 | 0 |
| 2004 | 6 |
| 2005 | 5 |
| 2006 | 5 |
| 2007 | 3 |
| 2008 | 1 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2010 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1 |
| Total | 185 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter W. Gage sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 152 publications — 44th percentile
44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 38–47 | 18 | |
| 48–57 | 79 | |
| 58–67 | 193 | |
| 68–77 | 323 | |
| 78–87 | 406 | |
| 88–97 | 452 | |
| 98–107 | 539 | |
| 108–117 | 505 | |
| 118–127 | 522 | |
| 128–137 | 469 | |
| 138–147 | 456 | |
| 148–157 | 459 | 152 |
| 158–167 | 397 | |
| 168–177 | 383 | |
| 178–187 | 350 | |
| 188–197 | 302 | |
| 198–207 | 306 | |
| 208–217 | 262 | |
| 218–227 | 242 | |
| 228–237 | 220 | |
| 238–247 | 203 | |
| 248–257 | 174 | |
| 258–267 | 176 | |
| 268–277 | 175 | |
| 278–287 | 125 | |
| 288–297 | 116 | |
| 298–307 | 127 | |
| 308–317 | 128 | |
| 318–327 | 99 | |
| 328–337 | 89 | |
| 338–347 | 78 | |
| 348–357 | 96 | |
| 358–367 | 66 | |
| 368–377 | 59 | |
| 378–387 | 65 | |
| 388–397 | 54 | |
| 398–407 | 48 | |
| 408–417 | 49 | |
| 418–427 | 34 | |
| 428–437 | 31 | |
| 438–447 | 30 | |
| 448–457 | 31 | |
| 458–467 | 36 | |
| 468–477 | 40 | |
| 478–487 | 35 | |
| 488–497 | 30 | |
| 498–507 | 23 | |
| 508–517 | 26 | |
| 518–527 | 20 | |
| 528–537 | 23 | |
| 538–547 | 20 | |
| 548–557 | 20 | |
| 558–567 | 17 | |
| 568–577 | 14 | |
| 578–587 | 20 | |
| 588–597 | 20 | |
| 598–607 | 19 | |
| 608–617 | 18 | |
| 618–627 | 17 | |
| 628–637 | 11 | |
| 638–647 | 11 | |
| 648–657 | 11 | |
| 658–667 | 8 | |
| 668–677 | 7 | |
| 678–687 | 11 | |
| 688–697 | 10 | |
| 698–707 | 4 | |
| 708–717 | 6 | |
| 718–727 | 5 | |
| 728–737 | 5 | |
| 738–747 | 9 | |
| 748–757 | 9 | |
| 758–767 | 3 | |
| 768–777 | 7 | |
| 778–787 | 7 | |
| 788–797 | 6 | |
| 798–807 | 2 | |
| 808–817 | 2 | |
| 818–827 | 7 | |
| 828–837 | 0 | |
| 838–847 | 9 | |
| 848–857 | 3 | |
| 858–867 | 1 | |
| 868–877 | 3 | |
| 878–886 | 6 | |
| 887+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter W. Gage sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile
54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 42 | |
| 32–33 | 172 | |
| 34–35 | 296 | |
| 36–37 | 435 | |
| 38–39 | 459 | |
| 40–41 | 456 | |
| 42–43 | 467 | |
| 44–45 | 478 | |
| 46–47 | 512 | |
| 48–49 | 435 | |
| 50–51 | 425 | |
| 52–53 | 418 | |
| 54–55 | 392 | |
| 56–57 | 357 | 56 |
| 58–59 | 334 | |
| 60–61 | 328 | |
| 62–63 | 260 | |
| 64–65 | 278 | |
| 66–67 | 239 | |
| 68–69 | 250 | |
| 70–71 | 210 | |
| 72–73 | 200 | |
| 74–75 | 189 | |
| 76–77 | 170 | |
| 78–79 | 146 | |
| 80–81 | 113 | |
| 82–83 | 126 | |
| 84–85 | 100 | |
| 86–87 | 84 | |
| 88–89 | 99 | |
| 90–91 | 84 | |
| 92–93 | 85 | |
| 94–95 | 72 | |
| 96–97 | 76 | |
| 98–99 | 45 | |
| 100–101 | 49 | |
| 102–103 | 43 | |
| 104–105 | 32 | |
| 106–107 | 45 | |
| 108–109 | 50 | |
| 110–111 | 32 | |
| 112–113 | 39 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 29 | |
| 118–119 | 27 | |
| 120–121 | 19 | |
| 122–123 | 23 | |
| 124–125 | 27 | |
| 126–127 | 16 | |
| 128–129 | 24 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 21 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 14 | |
| 138–139 | 15 | |
| 140–141 | 10 | |
| 142–143 | 10 | |
| 144–145 | 13 | |
| 146–147 | 9 | |
| 148–149 | 8 | |
| 150–151 | 6 | |
| 152–153 | 6 | |
| 154–155 | 7 | |
| 156–157 | 7 | |
| 158–159 | 10 | |
| 160–161 | 4 | |
| 162 | 8 | |
| 163+ | 100 |
C R French;P Sah;K J Buckett;P W Gage
Y K Ju;D A Saint;P W Gage
Angela Dulhunty;Peter Gage;Suzanne Curtis;Gareth Chelvanayagam
Peter W. Gage;Brian Robertson
Peter W. Gage;Robert S. Eisenberg
D. A. Saint;Yue-Kun Ju;P. W. Gage
M. W. Fryer;P. W. Gage;I. R. Neering;A. F. Dulhunty
P W Gage;R N McBurney
M Eghbali;J P Curmi;Bryndis Birnir;P W Gage
Sabine C. Piller;Patricia Jans;Peter W. Gage;David A. Jans
G L Collingridge;P W Gage;B Robertson
S C Piller;G D Ewart;A Premkumar;G B Cox
Unknown
Anna K M Hammarström;Peter W Gage
A. K. M. Hammarström;P. W. Gage
A. K. M. Hammarström;P. W. Gage
P W Gage;R N McBurney;G T Schneider
Peter W. Gage
P Sah;A J Gibb;P W Gage
Unknown
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.