World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
51
Citations
16326
World Ranking
2517
National Ranking
434

Peter Laslett publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Laslett sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 196 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Peter Laslett D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Laslett sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Laslett was affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their academic career focused on areas that contributed to the research environment at this institution.

They did not have recent papers listed, nor frequent co-authors, making specific collaborative research patterns or recent publication trends unavailable for further examination.

There were no specific main fields of study, subfields, or main topics associated with their work in the available data, preventing detailed analysis of the precise disciplinary or thematic focus of their research.

No book publications or awards were recorded, so there is no designated recognition or extended academic output through monographs documented for this individual.

Due to the lack of detailed publication venues or records of papers, it is not possible to elaborate on the impact or scope of their research contributions within scientific literature or specific fields.

The scientist is deceased, and the profile reflects their academic record as known without additional interpretive content.

Best Publications

  • Two Treatises of Government.

    Rosalie L. Colie;John Locke;Peter Laslett

  • A Fresh Map of Life: The Emergence of the Third Age

    Peter Laslett

  • The World We Have Lost

    Peter Laslett

  • Household and family in past time

    Peter Laslett;R. Wall

  • Debating Deliberative Democracy

    James S. Fishkin;Peter Laslett

  • John Locke, from TwoTreatises of Government (1690)

    John Locke;P. Laslett

  • Family life and illicit love in earlier generations

    Jean-Louis Flandrin;Peter Laslett

  • Philosophy, Politics, and Society

    Peter Laslett;James Fishkin

  • Comparing Household Structure Over Time and Between Cultures

    E. A. Hammel;Peter Laslett

  • Family Forms in Historic Europe.

    D. M. Palliser;Richard Wall;Jean Robin;Peter Laslett

  • A fresh map of life

    Peter Laslett

  • The Emergence of the Third Age

    Peter Laslett

  • Family, kinship and collectivity as systems of support in pre-industrial Europe: a consideration of the ‘nuclear-hardship’ hypothesis

    Peter Laslett

  • Justice between age groups and generations

    Peter Laslett;James S. Fishkin

  • Philosophy, Politics and Society.

    Robert Bierstedt;Peter Laslett;W. G. Runciman

  • Family Life and Illicit Love in Earlier Generations: Essays in Historical Sociology

    Peter Laslett

  • Size and structure of the household in England over three centuries

    Peter Laslett

  • Characteristics of the Western Family Considered Over Time

    Peter Laslett

  • The World We Have Lost: Further Explored

    Peter Laslett

  • Philosophy, politics and society

    Peter Laslett

  • The World we have gained : histories of population and social structure

    Lloyd Bonfield;Richard Smith;Keith Wrightson;Peter Laslett

  • Household and Family in Past Time: Comparative Studies in the Size and Structure of the Domestic Group over the Last Three Centuries in England, France, Serbia, Japan, and Colonial North America

    Peter Laslett;Richard Wall

Frequent Co-Authors

John Locke
John Locke City University of New York
James S. Fishkin
James S. Fishkin Stanford University
Kathleen Kiernan
Kathleen Kiernan University of York
Susan Cotts Watkins
Susan Cotts Watkins University of California, Los Angeles
Joan Wallach Scott
Joan Wallach Scott Institute for Advanced Study
Onora O'Neill
Onora O'Neill University of Cambridge
Peter Uhlenberg
Peter Uhlenberg University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Quentin Skinner
Quentin Skinner Queen Mary University of London
Partha Dasgupta
Partha Dasgupta University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to diverse and rewarding careers. Today, there’s growing demand for flexible online programs that can fast-track your journey. For students interested in social work, accelerated msw online programs allow you to earn your master’s degree in less time—letting you make a difference sooner.

If psychology intrigues you, consider earning your degree faster with an accelerated bachelor's degree psychology program. These offer a strong foundation for careers in counseling, mental health, or research, and can also be a steppingstone to graduate studies.

For those drawn to counseling, selecting cacrep schools ensures your degree meets high industry standards, supporting your licensure and employment opportunities. Likewise, future marriage and family therapists can lower costs and maximize value by enrolling in one of the cheapest online mft programs that are both accessible and reputable.

With these pathways, you can pursue your passion for helping others while benefiting from affordable, accredited, and accelerated online education.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Laslett

Recently Published Articles