What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Phytoplankton
- Ecosystem
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Phytoplankton, Zooplankton, Ecology, Oceanography and Biomass.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Photosynthesis, Botany, Animal science and Plankton in addition to Phytoplankton.
His work investigates the relationship between Zooplankton and topics such as Bloom that intersect with problems in Copepod.
His Ecology research incorporates themes from Cyanobacteria, Marine bacteriophage and Polymerase chain reaction.
His research on Oceanography frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Chlorophyll a.
As part of one scientific family, he deals mainly with the area of Biomass, narrowing it down to issues related to the Trophic level, and often Pelagic zone, Ecosystem and Dinoflagellate.
His most cited work include:
- Organism life cycles, predation, and the structure of marine pelagic ecosystems (518 citations)
- Relationships between cell volume and the carbon and nitrogen content of marine photosynthetic nanoplankton (509 citations)
- Iron and grazing constraints on primary production in the central equatorial Pacific: An EqPac synthesis (367 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Ecology, Oceanography, Phytoplankton, Plankton and Zooplankton.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Spring bloom, Grazing and Chlorophyll a.
His Phytoplankton study combines topics in areas such as Photosynthesis, Bloom, Total organic carbon, Diatom and Animal science.
His Bloom research focuses on subjects like Algae, which are linked to Mesocosm.
His studies in Plankton integrate themes in fields like Estuary, Marine ecosystem and Salt marsh.
His Zooplankton research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Nanophytoplankton, Food web and Photic zone.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (39.77%)
- Oceanography (38.64%)
- Phytoplankton (29.55%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2006-2018)?
- Ecology (39.77%)
- Mesocosm (9.09%)
- Phytoplankton (29.55%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Peter G. Verity mostly deals with Ecology, Mesocosm, Phytoplankton, Plankton and Oceanography.
His research integrates issues of Diatom, Botany, Biogeochemical cycle, Microbiology and Biogeochemistry in his study of Mesocosm.
His Phytoplankton study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Bloom, Nitrate and Algae.
His Plankton study often links to related topics such as Zooplankton.
His Zooplankton research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Nanophytoplankton, Copepod, Ecosystem model and Iron fertilization.
His work deals with themes such as Species richness, Microbial food web, Species diversity and Invasive species, which intersect with Oceanography.
Between 2006 and 2018, his most popular works were:
- The life cycle of Phaeocystis: State of knowledge and presumptive role in ecology (82 citations)
- Evaluation of the effects of various chemicals on discharge of and pain caused by jellyfish nematocysts (48 citations)
- Response of microzooplankton (protists and small copepods) to an iron-induced phytoplankton bloom in the Southern Ocean (EisenEx) (40 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Phytoplankton
- Ecosystem
His primary areas of investigation include Ecology, Microbial food web, Bloom, Oceanography and Plankton.
Ecology and Vegetative reproduction are frequently intertwined in his study.
His Microbial food web research includes themes of Mesocosm, Host and Microbiology.
His studies deal with areas such as Algae, Ecosystem, Flagellate, Morphology and Ploidy as well as Bloom.
Peter G. Verity has included themes like Trophic level and Phytoplankton in his Oceanography study.
Peter G. Verity combines subjects such as Copepod, Algal bloom, Grazing pressure, Dominance and Eutrophication with his study of Plankton.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
