World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 71 2182 2075 272 261 170 20641

Peter D. Keightley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter D. Keightley between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter D. Keightley published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2005. 4 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2005. 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 8 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1983 2025

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter D. Keightley: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 2
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 2
1988 2
1989 3
1990 2
1991 2
1992 1
1993 4
1994 6
1995 5
1996 4
1997 5
1998 8
1999 7
2000 6
2001 3
2002 5
2003 6
2004 8
2005 10
2006 6
2007 6
2008 3
2009 6
2010 5
2011 5
2012 9
2013 3
2014 4
2015 6
2016 5
2017 7
2018 3
2019 3
2020 1
2021 8
2022 6
2023 0
2024 3
2025 1
Total 181
Download as CSV

Peter D. Keightley publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter D. Keightley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 165–174 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 170 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter D. Keightley D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter D. Keightley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158 71
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom
  • 2005 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh

Overview

Peter D. Keightley is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom and conducts research primarily in the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work spans several subfields, including Genetics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, and Ecology.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of genetic and evolutionary studies, with a focus on Evolution and Genetic Dynamics, Genetic diversity and population structure, Chromosomal and Genetic Variations, Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, and Algal biology and biofuel production.

Recent publications by Peter D. Keightley include:

  • "Recommendations for improving statistical inference in population genomics," 2022, PLoS Biology
  • "Comparative genomics of Chlamydomonas," 2021, The Plant Cell
  • "Variation in mutation, recombination, and transposition rates in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans," 2023, Genome Research
  • "Cis-regulatory evolution spotlights species differences in the adaptive potential of gene expression plasticity," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Inbred lab mice are not isogenic: genetic variation within inbred strains used to infer the mutation rate per nucleotide site," 2020, Heredity

Peter D. Keightley frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Rory J. Craig
  • Jobran Chebib
  • Eugenio López-Cortegano
  • Rob W. Ness
  • Diethard Tautz

The scientist regularly publishes in several venues, with multiple contributions to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Genome Research, PLoS Biology, Molecular Biology and Evolution, and The Plant Cell.

Among recognitions received, Peter D. Keightley was made a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 2005 and a Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom, in 2014.

Best Publications

  • Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny.

    Andrew G. Clark;Michael B. Eisen;Michael B. Eisen;Douglas R. Smith;Casey M. Bergman

  • The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations

    Adam Eyre-Walker;Adam Eyre-Walker;Peter D. Keightley

  • Understanding quantitative genetic variation.

    Nicholas H. Barton;Peter D. Keightley

  • Spontaneous Mutation Accumulation Studies in Evolutionary Genetics

    Daniel L. Halligan;Peter D. Keightley

  • High genomic deleterious mutation rates in hominids

    Adam Eyre-Walker;Peter D. Keightley

  • Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change

    Adam Eyre-Walker;Peter D. Keightley

  • Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila

    Cathy Haag-Liautard;Mark Dorris;Xulio Maside;Steven Macaskill

  • Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations

    Peter D. Keightley;Sarah P. Otto

  • Analysis of the genome sequences of three Drosophila melanogaster spontaneous mutation accumulation lines.

    Peter D. Keightley;Urmi Trivedi;Marian Thomson;Fiona Oliver

  • Enhanced CpG Mutability and Tumorigenesis in MBD4-Deficient Mice

    Catherine B. Millar;Jacky Guy;Owen J. Sansom;Jim Selfridge

  • Joint Inference of the Distribution of Fitness Effects of Deleterious Mutations and Population Demography Based on Nucleotide Polymorphism Frequencies

    Peter D Keightley;Adam Eyre-Walker

  • Direct estimation of the mitochondrial DNA mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster

    Cathy Haag-Liautard;Nicole Coffey;David Houle;Michael Lynch

  • Estimation of the Spontaneous Mutation Rate in Heliconius melpomene

    Peter D Keightley;Ana Pinharanda;Rob W Ness;Fraser Simpson

  • The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

    Peter D. Keightley

  • Estimation of the spontaneous mutation rate per nucleotide site in a Drosophila melanogaster full-sib family

    Peter D Keightley;Rob W Ness;Daniel L Halligan;Penelope R Haddrill

  • Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison

    Daniel L. Halligan;Peter D. Keightley

  • GENOMIC MUTATION RATES FOR LIFETIME REPRODUCTIVE OUTPUT AND LIFESPAN IN CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS

    Peter D. Keightley;Armando Caballero

  • Deleterious Mutations and the Evolution of Sex

    Peter D. Keightley;Adam Eyre-Walker

  • Evidence for widespread degradation of gene control regions in hominid genomes.

    Peter D Keightley;Martin J Lercher;Adam Eyre-Walker

  • A Comparison of Models to Infer the Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Mutations

    Athanasios Kousathanas;Peter D Keightley

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam Eyre-Walker
Adam Eyre-Walker University of Sussex
Armando Caballero
Armando Caballero Universidade de Vigo
William G. Hill
William G. Hill University of Edinburgh
Daniel J. Gaffney
Daniel J. Gaffney Wellcome Sanger Institute
Brian Charlesworth
Brian Charlesworth University of Edinburgh
Michael Lynch
Michael Lynch Arizona State University
Sarah P. Otto
Sarah P. Otto University of British Columbia
Sergey V. Nuzhdin
Sergey V. Nuzhdin University of Southern California
Peter M. Visscher
Peter M. Visscher University of Oxford
Albert Tenesa
Albert Tenesa University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in Genetics but exploring broader career options in healthcare? Many related fields offer robust online learning opportunities and diverse career pathways. For example, those seeking a fast entry into healthcare administration may benefit from online health administration programs and accredited degrees that allow you to quickly build managerial skills relevant to clinics, hospitals, or biotech companies.

If you’re focused on affordability, you might consider a low cost medical coding and billing online program. These programs open doors to important roles in healthcare data, insurance, and compliance—areas that often intersect with genetics research and recordkeeping.

Alternatively, students might explore nursing programs with high acceptance rates, which provide accessible entry points to clinical practice and patient care. For those seeking to lead in healthcare, a bachelors in healthcare administration offers pathways into leadership roles across a variety of settings.

Online programs can offer flexibility, affordability, and specialized training that align well with careers in genetics and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Peter D. Keightley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles