World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
77
Citations
19100
World Ranking
1667
National Ranking
986

Neuroscience

D-Index
77
Citations
19160
World Ranking
1855
National Ranking
888

Peter C. Holland publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Holland sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 193 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter C. Holland D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Holland sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter C. Holland is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research contributions primarily focus on neuroscience, particularly involving the processing of conditioned stimuli and the role of cholinergic systems in the brain.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • Author Correction: Dissociating task acquisition from expression during learning reveals latent knowledge (2020, Nature Communications)
  • Removal of Cholinergic Input to Rat Posterior Parietal Cortex Disrupts Incremental Processing of Conditioned Stimuli (2021, UNC Libraries)
  • Disruption of Decrements in Conditioned Stimulus Processing by Selective Removal of Hippocampal Cholinergic Input (2021, UNC Libraries)
  • Basal forebrain cholinergic lesions disrupt increments but not decrements in conditioned stimulus processing (2021, UNC Libraries)

The venues where these works were published include:

  • UNC Libraries (3 publications)
  • Nature Communications (1 publication)

Frequently collaborating coauthors are:

  • Michela Gallagher
  • David J. Bucci
  • Kishore V. Kuchibhotla
  • Tom Hindmarsh Sten
  • Eleni S. Papadoyannis

Best Publications

  • Amygdala circuitry in attentional and representational processes.

    Peter C. Holland;Michela Gallagher

  • The rostromedial tegmental nucleus (RMTg), a GABAergic afferent to midbrain dopamine neurons, encodes aversive stimuli and inhibits motor responses.

    Thomas C. Jhou;Howard L. Fields;Mark G. Baxter;Clifford B. Saper

  • Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response

    Peter C. Holland

  • Neurotoxic Lesions of Basolateral, But Not Central, Amygdala Interfere with Pavlovian Second-Order Conditioning and Reinforcer Devaluation Effects

    Tammy Hatfield;Jung Soo Han;Michael Conley;Michela Gallagher

  • Amygdala-frontal interactions and reward expectancy.

    Peter C Holland;Michela Gallagher

  • Relations between Pavlovian-instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation.

    Peter C. Holland

  • Different roles for orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala in a reinforcer devaluation task.

    Charles L. Pickens;Michael P. Saddoris;Barry Setlow;Michela Gallagher

  • Hippocampus and context in classical conditioning.

    Peter C Holland;Mark E Bouton

  • The amygdala complex: multiple roles in associative learning and attention

    Michela Gallagher;Peter C. Holland

  • Differential effects of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning.

    Peter C. Holland;James J. Straub

  • The effect of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after first- and second-order appetitive conditioning.

    Unknown

  • Basal forebrain cholinergic lesions disrupt increments but not decrements in conditioned stimulus processing

    Andrea A. Chiba;David J. Bucci;Peter C. Holland;Michela Gallagher

  • Event representation in Pavlovian conditioning: image and action.

    Peter C. Holland

  • Occasion setting: Associative learning and cognition in animals.

    Nestor A. Schmajuk;Peter C. Holland

  • Double dissociation of the effects of lesions of basolateral and central amygdala on conditioned stimulus-potentiated feeding and Pavlovian-instrumental transfer.

    Peter C. Holland;Michela Gallagher

  • Second-order conditioning with food unconditioned stimulus.

    Peter C. Holland;Robert A. Rescorla

  • Hippocampectomy disrupts acquisition and retention of learned conditional responding.

    Robert T. Ross;William B. Orr;Peter C. Holland;Theodore W. Berger

  • Preserved configural learning and spatial learning impairment in rats with hippocampal damage

    Michela Gallagher;Peter C. Holland

  • Amygdalo-hypothalamic circuit allows learned cues to override satiety and promote eating.

    Gorica D. Petrovich;Barry Setlow;Peter C. Holland;Michela Gallagher

  • Removal of Cholinergic Input to Rat Posterior Parietal Cortex Disrupts Incremental Processing of Conditioned Stimuli

    David J. Bucci;Peter C. Holland;Michela Gallagher

  • Amygdalar and Prefrontal Pathways to the Lateral Hypothalamus Are Activated by a Learned Cue That Stimulates Eating

    Gorica D. Petrovich;Peter C. Holland;Michela Gallagher

  • Orbitofrontal lesions impair use of cue-outcome associations in a devaluation task.

    Charles L. Pickens;Michael P. Saddoris;Michela Gallagher;Peter C. Holland

Frequent Co-Authors

Michela Gallagher
Michela Gallagher Johns Hopkins University
Robert C. Froemke
Robert C. Froemke New York University
Gorica D. Petrovich
Gorica D. Petrovich Boston College
Andrew Sherwood
Andrew Sherwood Duke University
Jay M. Baraban
Jay M. Baraban Johns Hopkins University
Barry Setlow
Barry Setlow University of Florida
Richard L. Huganir
Richard L. Huganir Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Geoffrey Schoenbaum National Institutes of Health
Kogo Takamiya
Kogo Takamiya University of Miyazaki
Antoine Roger Adamantidis
Antoine Roger Adamantidis University of Bern

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to many rewarding online degree programs and career pathways, particularly in areas like counseling. Current trends show a growing demand for mental health professionals, making this field both impactful and stable.

For those interested in specializing, there are popular counseling programs in San Francisco that focus on innovative therapy techniques and urban mental health needs. If you prefer a blend of traditional and modern approaches, you can explore popular counseling degrees in Stockton with diverse program offerings.

Students seeking broader options may consider the range of popular counseling degrees in Texas known for integrating cultural competence into their curricula. For a national perspective that highlights academic excellence and career outcomes, review the top-ranked counseling degree programs in USA.

Pursuing these online degrees can lead to roles such as school counselor, marriage and family therapist, or licensed professional counselor. As mental health awareness grows, professionals with specialized training will continue to be in great demand.

Best Scientists Citing Peter C. Holland

Trending Scientists