World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Per Ottar Seglen

Per Ottar Seglen

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
82
Citations
64932
World Ranking
3600
National Ranking
12

Per Ottar Seglen publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Per Ottar Seglen sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 199 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Per Ottar Seglen D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Per Ottar Seglen sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Per Ottar Seglen is affiliated with the University of Oslo in Norway. The scientist's work spans multiple areas within academic research, focusing on various topics and fields of study, though specific details about these areas are not provided.

There is no detailed information available about recent publications or papers, so the particular research contributions in terms of published works cannot be outlined.

Similarly, there are no records of frequent co-authors or common publication venues associated with this scientist, which limits the ability to describe typical collaborative networks or preferred journals and conferences for dissemination of their research.

Publication of books is a potential area of interest, but no data is available regarding book publishers or titles that would shed light on their involvement in academic book publishing.

No awards or recognitions have been recorded for this researcher, which indicates either none have been received or such data is not available.

The absence of specified main or subfields of study highlights a lack of detailed categorical data on the scientific disciplines in which Per Ottar Seglen specializes.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Preparation of isolated rat liver cells.

    Per O. Seglen

  • Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research

    Per Ottar Seglen

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy in higher eukaryotes

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Hagai Abeliovich;Patrizia Agostinis;Devendra K. Agrawal

  • 3-Methyladenine: Specific inhibitor of autophagic/lysosomal protein degradation in isolated rat hepatocytes

    Per Ottar Seglen;P. B. Gordon

  • Preparation of rat liver cells. 3. Enzymatic requirements for tissue dispersion.

    Per Ottar Seglen

  • The skewness of science

    Per O. Seglen

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Methods for monitoring autophagy from yeast to human.

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Ana Maria Cuervo;Per O. Seglen

  • Does bafilomycin A1 block the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Zvulun Elazar;Per Ottar Seglen;David C. Rubinsztein

  • Preparation of rat liver cells. I. Effect of Ca 2+ on enzymatic dispersion of isolated, perfused liver.

    Per Ottar Seglen

  • Preparation of rat liver cells: II. Effects of ions and chelators on tissue dispersion☆

    P.O. Seglen

  • Programmed Autophagy in the Drosophila Fat Body Is Induced by Ecdysone through Regulation of the PI3K Pathway

    Tor Erik Rusten;Karine Lindmo;Gábor Juhász;Miklós Sass

  • Inhibition of the Lysosomal Pathway of Protein Degradation in Isolated Rat Hepatocytes by Ammonia, Methylamine, Chloroquine and Leupeptin

    Per O. Seglen;Bjørn Grinde;Anne E. Solheim

  • Autophagy and other vacuolar protein degradation mechanisms

    P. O. Seglen;P. Bohley

  • Isolation and Characterization of Rat Liver Amphisomes: EVIDENCE FOR FUSION OF AUTOPHAGOSOMES WITH BOTH EARLY AND LATE ENDOSOMES

    Trond Olav Berg;Monica Fengsrud;Per Eivind Strømhaug;Trond Berg

  • Inhibitors of lysosomal function.

    Per Ottar Seglen

  • Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality.

    Per Ottar Seglen

Frequent Co-Authors

Trond Berg
Trond Berg University of Oslo
Per E. Schwarze
Per E. Schwarze Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Daniel J. Klionsky
Daniel J. Klionsky University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Beth Levine
Beth Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Sergio Lavandero
Sergio Lavandero University of Chile
Ian G. Mills
Ian G. Mills University of Oxford
Evelina Gatti
Evelina Gatti Aix-Marseille University
Fulvio Reggiori
Fulvio Reggiori University of Groningen
Ana Maria Cuervo
Ana Maria Cuervo Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Andrea Ballabio
Andrea Ballabio Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Biology or Biochemistry, there are several online degree and career options to consider. Students looking for a specialized, practical field may pursue a fast track nutrition degree online. These programs allow you to complete your studies quickly and efficiently, opening doors to roles in health and wellness.

For those who want to move into healthcare leadership, earning an affordable online mba healthcare management can be a smart investment. This pathway is ideal for biology graduates looking to combine their scientific background with business skills for faster career advancement.

Alternatively, the world of medical coding offers stable and well-paid opportunities. Learning about certified coding specialist credentials helps you understand options and earning potential within healthcare documentation and administration.

If you are considering this route, you may also want to research how much does a medical coder make to gauge financial prospects and job growth. Each of these options complements a science background and can broaden your career horizons.

Best Scientists Citing Per Ottar Seglen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles