World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
18825
World Ranking
2859
National Ranking
1327

Peter W. Kaplan publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter W. Kaplan sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 374 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Peter W. Kaplan D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter W. Kaplan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter W. Kaplan is affiliated with Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a primary focus on Medicine and Neuroscience. Subfields of particular interest include Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Neurology, and Emergency Medicine.

The main topics covered in their work are as follows:

  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
  • Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Kaplan's publications appear frequently in a number of scientific journals, indicating a consistent contribution to their fields of study. The top venues include:

  • Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Neurology
  • Epilepsia
  • Epileptic Disorders

Recent notable papers authored by Kaplan or in collaboration include:

  • "American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2021 Version" (2021), Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
  • "Updated nomenclature of delirium and acute encephalopathy: statement of ten Societies" (2020), Intensive Care Medicine
  • "Development of Expert-Level Classification of Seizures and Rhythmic and Periodic Patterns During EEG Interpretation" (2023), Neurology
  • "How to carry out and interpret EEG recordings in COVID-19 patients in ICU?" (2020), Clinical Neurophysiology
  • "Diagnosing nonconvulsive status epilepticus: Defining electroencephalographic and clinical response to diagnostic intravenous antiseizure medication trials" (2023), Epilepsia

Collaboration plays a significant role in Kaplan's research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • M. Brandon Westover
  • Philippe Gélisse
  • Sándor Beniczky
  • Khalil S. Husari
  • Jin Jing

Best Publications

  • American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2012 version.

    Lawrence J. Hirsch;S. M. Laroche;N. Gaspard;E. Gerard

  • American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2021 Version.

    Lawrence J. Hirsch;Michael W.K. Fong;Markus Leitinger;Suzette M. LaRoche

  • Prognostication after cardiac arrest and hypothermia: a prospective study.

    Andrea O. Rossetti;Mauro Oddo;Giancarlo Logroscino;Peter W. Kaplan

  • Consensus statement on continuous EEG in critically ill adults and children, part I: indications.

    Susan T. Herman;Nicholas S. Abend;Thomas P. Bleck;Kevin E. Chapman

  • Unified EEG terminology and criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus.

    Sándor Beniczky;Lawrence J. Hirsch;Peter W. Kaplan;Ronit Pressler

  • A revised glossary of terms most commonly used by clinical electroencephalographers and updated proposal for the report format of the EEG findings. Revision 2017.

    Nick Kane;Jayant Acharya;Sandor Benickzy;Luis Caboclo

  • New-onset refractory status epilepticus: Etiology, clinical features, and outcome

    Nicolas Gaspard;Nicolas Gaspard;Brandon P. Foreman;Vincent Alvarez;Vincent Alvarez;Christian Cabrera Kang

  • Predictors of awakening from postanoxic status epilepticus after therapeutic hypothermia

    Andrea O. Rossetti;Mauro Oddo;Lucas Liaudet;Peter W. Kaplan

  • Updated nomenclature of delirium and acute encephalopathy: statement of ten Societies.

    Arjen J.C. Slooter;Wim M. Otte;John W. Devlin;John W. Devlin;Rakesh C. Arora

  • Assessing the outcomes in patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus: nonconvulsive status epilepticus is underdiagnosed, potentially overtreated, and confounded by comorbidity.

    Peter W. Kaplan

  • Anesthetic drugs in status epilepticus: Risk or rescue? A 6-year cohort study

    Raoul Sutter;Stephan Marsch;Peter Fuhr;Peter W. Kaplan

  • Management issues for women with epilepsy-Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): II. Teratogenesis and perinatal outcomes: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.

    Cynthia L. Harden;Cynthia L. Harden;Kimford J. Meador;Page B. Pennell;W. Allen Hauser

  • Prognostic value of continuous EEG monitoring during therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest

    Andrea O Rossetti;Luis A Urbano;Frederik Delodder;Peter W Kaplan

  • Clinical utility of EEG in diagnosing and monitoring epilepsy in adults.

    W O Tatum;G Rubboli;P W Kaplan;S M Mirsatari

  • Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus in the Emergency Room

    Peter W. Kaplan

  • STATUS EPILEPTICUS: AN INDEPENDENT OUTCOME PREDICTOR AFTER CEREBRAL ANOXIA

    Peter W. Kaplan;Yazmin Morales

  • The ACNS subcommittee on research terminology for continuous EEG monitoring: proposed standardized terminology for rhythmic and periodic EEG patterns encountered in critically ill patients.

    Lawrence J. Hirsch;Richard P. Brenner;Frank W. Drislane;Elson So

  • Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus

    Peter W. Kaplan

  • The EEG in metabolic encephalopathy and coma.

    Peter W Kaplan

  • Handbook of EEG Interpretation

    Peter W. Kaplan;Selim Benbadis;Aatif Husain;William O. Tatum

  • Predictors of awakening from postanoxic status epilepticus after therapeutic hypothermia

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrea O. Rossetti
Andrea O. Rossetti University of Lausanne
Ronald P. Lesser
Ronald P. Lesser Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Eugen Trinka
Eugen Trinka Paracelsus Medical University
Robert S. Fisher
Robert S. Fisher Stanford University
Daniel F. Hanley
Daniel F. Hanley Johns Hopkins University
Sándor Beniczky
Sándor Beniczky Aarhus University Hospital
Lawrence J. Hirsch
Lawrence J. Hirsch Yale University
Jan Claassen
Jan Claassen Columbia University
Selim R. Benbadis
Selim R. Benbadis University of South Florida
Mackenzie C. Cervenka
Mackenzie C. Cervenka Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter W. Kaplan

Trending Scientists