World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
3576
World Ranking
8123
National Ranking
56

Pavel Cudlín publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pavel Cudlín sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 165 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Pavel Cudlín D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pavel Cudlín sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pavel Cudlín is affiliated with the Czech Academy of Sciences in the Czech Republic and has an extensive research record in the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work spans several subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Plant Science.

The main topics explored by Pavel Cudlín include Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies, Forest Ecology and Management, Soil Erosion and Sediment Transport, Remote Sensing and Land Use, Soil and Land Suitability Analysis, and Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Pavel Cudlín include the following:

  • Managing floodplains using nature-based solutions to support multiple ecosystem functions and services, 2021, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
  • Density matters? Settlement expansion and land degradation in Peri-urban and rural districts of Italy, 2021, Environmental Impact Assessment Review
  • Population trends and desertification risk in a Mediterranean region, 1861-2017, 2020, Land Use Policy
  • Assessing the impact of multiple drivers of land sensitivity to desertification in a Mediterranean country, 2021, Environmental Impact Assessment Review
  • Desertification risk fuels spatial polarization in 'affected' and 'unaffected' landscapes in Italy, 2022, Scientific Reports

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Pavel Cudlín include:

  • Luca Salvati
  • Ondřej Cudlín
  • Vilém Pechanec
  • Marcela Prokopová
  • Renata Včeláková

Publication venues where Pavel Cudlín has published multiple papers include:

  • Sustainability
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Helda (University of Helsinki)
  • Environmental Impact Assessment Review
  • Forests

Best Publications

  • The use of mosses and pine needles to detect persistent organic pollutants at local and regional scales.

    I. Holoubek;P. Kořı́nek;Z. Šeda;E. Schneiderová

  • Influence of woody elements of a Norway spruce canopy on nadir reflectance simulated by the DART model at very high spatial resolution

    Zbynek Malenovsky;Zbynek Malenovsky;Emmanuel Martin;Lucie Homolova;Jean-Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry

  • Major changes in forest carbon and nitrogen cycling caused by declining sulphur deposition

    Filip Oulehle;Christopher D. Evans;Jenyk Hofmeister;Radovan Krejci

  • Western Carpathian mountain spruce forest after a windthrow: Natural regeneration in cleared and uncleared areas

    M. Jonášová;E. Vávrová;P. Cudlín

  • Serious mismatches continue between science and policy in forest bioenergy

    Michael Norton;Andras Baldi;Vicas Buda;Bruno Carli

  • Fine roots and ectomycorrhizas as indicators of environmental change

    Pavel Cudlin;B. Kieliszewska-Rokicka;M. Rudawska;Tine Grebenc

  • Applicability of the PROSPECT model for Norway spruce needles

    Z Malenovský;J Albrechtová;Z Lhotáková;R Zurita‐Milla

  • Managing floodplains using nature-based solutions to support multiple ecosystem functions and services

    Jiří Jakubínský;Marcela Prokopová;Pavel Raška;Luca Salvati

  • Pollution control enhanced spruce growth in the "Black Triangle" near the Czech-Polish border.

    Tomáš Kolář;Tomáš Kolář;Petr Čermák;Filip Oulehle;Miroslav Trnka;Miroslav Trnka

  • The effect of reduced atmospheric deposition on soil and soil solution chemistry at a site subjected to long-term acidification, Načetín, Czech Republic

    Filip Oulehle;Jeňýk Hofmeister;Pavel Cudlín;Jakub Hruška

  • Modelling of the carbon sequestration and its prediction under climate change

    Vilém Pechanec;Jan Purkyt;Antonín Benc;Chukwudi Nwaogu

  • A NEW HYPERSPECTRAL INDEX FOR CHLOROPHYLL ESTIMATION OF A FOREST CANOPY: AREA UNDER CURVE NORMALISED TO MAXIMAL BAND DEPTH BETWEEN 650-725 NM

    Z. Malenovsky;C. Ufer;Z. Lhotakova;J.G.P.W. Clevers

  • Density matters? Settlement expansion and land degradation in Peri-urban and rural districts of Italy

    Rosa Coluzzi;Leonardo Bianchini;Gianluca Egidi;Pavel Cudlin

  • Drivers of treeline shift in different European mountains

    Pavel Cudlin;Matija Klopcic;Roberto Tognetti;Frantisek Mális

  • Climate Change, Air Pollution and Global Challenges. Understanding and Perspectives from Forest Research

    R. Matyssek;N. Clarke;P. Cudlin;T. N. Mikkelsen

  • Population trends and desertification risk in a Mediterranean region, 1861-2017

    Federico Benassi;Sirio Cividino;Pavel Cudlin;Ahmed Alhuseen

  • Characteristics of Norway spruce trees (Picea abies) surviving a spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) outbreak

    R. Jakuš;R. Jakuš;M. Edwards-Jonášová;P. Cudlín;M. Blaženec

  • Forest ecosystem services affected by natural disturbances, climate and land-use changes in the Tatra Mountains

    P. Fleischer;V. Pichler;L. Holko;F. Máliš

  • Priority questions in multidisciplinary drought research

    Miroslav Trnka;Michael Hayes;František Jurečka;Lenka Bartošová

  • Soil mercury distribution in adjacent coniferous and deciduous stands highly impacted by acid rain in the Ore Mountains, Czech Republic☆

    Tomáš Navrátil;James B. Shanley;Jan Rohovec;Filip Oulehle

  • Effectiveness of Natura 2000 system for habitat types protection: A case study from the Czech Republic

    Vilém Pechanec;Ivo Machar;Tomáš Pohanka;Zdeněk Opršal

  • Belowground biodiversity relates positively to ecosystem services of European forests

    Mark R. Bakker;Ivano Brunner;Francis Ashwood;Brynhildur Bjarnadottir

Frequent Co-Authors

Luca Salvati
Luca Salvati Sapienza University of Rome
Michael E. Schaepman
Michael E. Schaepman University of Zurich
Jana Albrechtová
Jana Albrechtová Charles University
Jan G. P. W. Clevers
Jan G. P. W. Clevers Wageningen University & Research
Otmar Urban
Otmar Urban Czech Academy of Sciences
Elena Paoletti
Elena Paoletti National Research Council (CNR)
Rainer Matyssek
Rainer Matyssek Technical University of Munich
Gerhard Wieser
Gerhard Wieser University of Innsbruck
Teis Nørgaard Mikkelsen
Teis Nørgaard Mikkelsen Technical University of Denmark
Miroslav Trnka
Miroslav Trnka Czech Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution often leads students to interdisciplinary learning and diverse career options. Many choose complementary fields like mathematics, where online math degree programs provide valuable skills for research, data analysis, and ecological modeling.

For those wishing to blend creativity with science, environmental outreach and science communication are key. The best online graphic design programs can strengthen your ability to visualize and share scientific data or create compelling conservation campaigns.

Some students opt for a broad-based curriculum, allowing them to combine biology, policy, data science, and more. These online interdisciplinary studies degree career outcomes include environmental consulting, nonprofit management, and education.

For advanced research, conservation leadership, or teaching roles, consider a history-focused approach. The masters in history can help you analyze environmental policy changes and the historical context of biodiversity.

Best Scientists Citing Pavel Cudlín

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles