World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 20 2019 1869 996 896 84 1491

Paul Poast publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul Poast between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul Poast published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2019. 13 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2019. 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 7 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 11 publications
2010 2025

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul Poast: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 4
2011 2
2012 1
2013 7
2014 4
2015 5
2016 5
2017 4
2018 18
2019 21
2020 21
2021 3
2022 4
2023 5
2024 2
2025 11
Total 117
Download as CSV

Paul Poast publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Poast sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–85 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 84 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71 84
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Paul Poast D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Poast sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 20 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 20 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76 20
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Mis)Using Dyadic Data to Analyze Multilateral Events

    Paul Poast

  • Does Issue Linkage Work? Evidence from European Alliance Negotiations, 1860 to 1945

    Paul Poast

  • The Political Resource Curse An Empirical Re-evaluation

    David Wiens;Paul Poast;William Roberts Clark

  • Backing Out or Backing In? Commitment and Consistency in Audience Costs Theory

    Jack S. Levy;Michael K. McKoy;Paul Poast;Geoffrey P.R. Wallace

  • Why Do States Build Walls? Political Economy, Security, and Border Stability

    David B. Carter;Paul Poast

  • How International Organizations Support Democratization: Preventing Authoritarian Reversals or Promoting Consolidation?

    Paul Poast;Johannes Urpelainen

  • Global Monetary Order and the Liberal Order Debate

    Carla Norrlof;Paul Poast;Benjamin J Cohen;Sabreena Croteau

  • Arms versus Democratic Allies

    Matthew Digiuseppe;Paul Poast

  • Dyads Are Dead, Long Live Dyads! The Limits of Dyadic Designs in International Relations Research

    Paul Poast

  • Issue linkage and international cooperation: An empirical investigation

    Paul Daniel Poast

  • Central Banks at War

    Paul Poast

  • Fit and Feasible: Why Democratizing States Form, not Join, International Organizations

    Paul Poast;Johannes Urpelainen

  • Barriers to Trade: How Border Walls Affect Trade Relations

    David B. Carter;Paul Poast

  • All Alliances Are Multilateral: Rethinking Alliance Formation

    Benjamin Fordham;Paul Poast

  • Domestic Signaling of Commitment Credibility: Military Recruitment and Alliance Formation

    Michael C. Horowitz;Paul Poast;Allan C. Stam

  • War is not over: What the optimists get wrong about conflict

    Unknown

  • Can Issue Linkage Improve Treaty Credibility?Buffer State Alliances as a "Hard Case"

    Paul Poast

  • War and Default

    Patrick E. Shea;Paul Poast

  • Monetary Institutions and the Political Survival of Democratic Leaders

    William R. Clark;Sona N. Golder;Paul Poast

  • Beyond the “Sinew of War”: The Political Economy of Security as a Subfield

    Paul Poast

Frequent Co-Authors

Johannes Urpelainen
Johannes Urpelainen Johns Hopkins University
Allan C. Stam
Allan C. Stam University of Virginia
Yonatan Lupu
Yonatan Lupu George Washington University
Michael Horowitz
Michael Horowitz University of Adelaide
Jack S. Levy
Jack S. Levy Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Benjamin J. Cohen
Benjamin J. Cohen University of California, Santa Barbara
Sarah E. Kreps
Sarah E. Kreps Cornell University
Benjamin O. Fordham
Benjamin O. Fordham Binghamton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Paul Poast

Recently Published Articles