World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
32
Citations
3742
World Ranking
9545
National Ranking
709

Paul L. Furlong publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul L. Furlong sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 95 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Paul L. Furlong D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul L. Furlong sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Paul L. Furlong is affiliated with Aston University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with notable subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, Epidemiology, and Pharmacology.

Their work focuses on several main topics: Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Epilepsy Research and Treatment, Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research, Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation, and Pelvic Floor Disorders Treatments.

Frequent venues for their publications include NeuroImage Clinical, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Human Brain Mapping, Brain Research, and Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Magnetoencephalography abnormalities in adult mild traumatic brain injury: A systematic review (2021, NeuroImage Clinical)
  • Mild traumatic brain injury impairs the coordination of intrinsic and motor-related neural dynamics (2021, NeuroImage Clinical)
  • Mapping Interictal activity in epilepsy using a hidden Markov model: A magnetoencephalography study (2022, Human Brain Mapping)
  • The Anxiety and Pain of Fibromyalgia Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))
  • Mapping language networks and their association with verbal abilities in paediatric epilepsy using MEG and graph analysis (2020, NeuroImage Clinical)

Frequent co-authors in their research activities include Lukas Rier, Lauren E. Gascoyne, Matthew J. Brookes, Anna Kharko, and Stephen D. Hall.

Paul L. Furlong holds the distinction of Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • A new approach to neuroimaging with magnetoencephalography.

    Arjan Hillebrand;Krish D Singh;Ian E Holliday;Paul Lawrence Furlong

  • The role of GABAergic modulation in motor function related neuronal network activity.

    Stephen D. Hall;Ian M. Stanford;Naoki Yamawaki;Craig J. McAllister

  • Central neural mechanisms mediating human visceral hypersensitivity.

    Sanchoy Sarkar;Anthony R. Hobson;Paul L. Furlong;Clifford J. Woolf

  • GLM-beamformer method demonstrates stationary field, alpha ERD and gamma ERS co-localisation with fMRI BOLD response in visual cortex

    Matthew J Brookes;Andrew M Gibson;Stephen D Hall;Paul Lawrence Furlong

  • Neuronal Network Pharmacodynamics of GABAergic Modulation in the Human Cortex Determined Using Pharmaco-Magnetoencephalography

    Stephen D. Hall;Gareth R. Barnes;Paul L. Furlong;Stefano Seri

  • The missing link: analogous human and primate cortical gamma oscillations

    Stephen D Hall;Ian E Holliday;Arjan Hillebrand;Krish D Singh

  • Dissociating the spatio-temporal characteristics of cortical neuronal activity associated with human volitional swallowing in the healthy adult brain

    Paul L. Furlong;Anthony R. Hobson;Qasim Aziz;Gareth R. Barnes

  • Co-registration of magnetoencephalography with magnetic resonance imaging using bite-bar-based fiducials and surface-matching.

    Peyman Adjamian;Gareth R. Barnes;Arjan Hillebrand;Ian E. Holliday

  • Real-time imaging of human cortical activity evoked by painful esophageal stimulation

    Anthony R Hobson;Anthony R Hobson;Paul Lawrence Furlong;Sian F Worthen;Sian F Worthen;Arjan Hillebrand

  • Topographic mapping of cortical potentials evoked by distension of the human proximal and distal oesophagus

    Q. Aziz;P.L. Furlong;J. Barlow;A. Hobson

  • Neurophysiologic assessment of esophageal sensory processing in noncardiac chest pain.

    Anthony R. Hobson;Paul L. Furlong;Sanchoy Sarkar;Philip J.M. Matthews

  • Evaluation of MRI-MEG/EEG co-registration strategies using Monte Carlo simulation

    Krish Devi Singh;I. E. Holliday;P. L. Furlong;G. F. A. Harding

  • Characterising the central mechanisms of sensory modulation in human swallowing motor cortex

    David Gow;Anthony R. Hobson;Paul L. Furlong;Shaheen Hamdy

  • A general linear model for MEG beamformer imaging.

    Matthew J Brookes;Andrew M Gibson;Stephen D Hall;Paul Lawrence Furlong

  • Cortical processing of human gut sensation: an evoked potential study

    David I. Hobday;Anthony R. Hobson;Sanchoy Sarkar;Paul L. Furlong

  • Brain activity modifications following spinal cord stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain: A systematic review

    Lisa Bentley;Rui Duarte;Paul Furlong;Robert L Ashford

  • Psychophysiological responses to visceral and somatic pain in functional chest pain identify clinically relevant pain clusters

    A.D. Farmer;S.J. Coen;S.J. Coen;M. Kano;M. Kano;H. Naqvi

  • Oscillatory Beta Activity Mediates Neuroplastic Effects of Motor Cortex Stimulation in Humans

    Craig J. McAllister;Kim C. Rönnqvist;Ian M. Stanford;Gavin L. Woodhall

  • Development of esophageal hypersensitivity following experimental duodenal acidification.

    Anthony R Hobson;Radia W Khan;Sanchoy Sarkar;Paul L Furlong

  • A cortical evoked potential study of afferents mediating human esophageal sensation.

    Anthony R. Hobson;Sanchoy Sarkar;Paul L. Furlong;David G. Thompson

  • Comparison of cortical potentials evoked by mechanical and electrical stimulation of the rectum.

    D. I. Hobday;A. Hobson;P. L. Furlong;D. G. Thompson

Frequent Co-Authors

Gareth R. Barnes
Gareth R. Barnes University College London
Arjan Hillebrand
Arjan Hillebrand Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Krish D. Singh
Krish D. Singh Cardiff University
Stefano Seri
Stefano Seri Aston University
David G. Thompson
David G. Thompson University of Manchester
Matthew J. Brookes
Matthew J. Brookes University of Nottingham
Gonzalo Alarcón
Gonzalo Alarcón King's College London
John C. Rothwell
John C. Rothwell University College London
Richard Bowtell
Richard Bowtell University of Nottingham
Amanda G. Wood
Amanda G. Wood Deakin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and related career pathways. Many students combine neuroscience with fields such as psychology, social work, or behavior analysis to broaden their career options and impact.

If you're interested in mental health or community services, consider cheapest msw programs online. These programs provide advanced social work skills while helping you save on tuition. For those who want to become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst, pursuing bcba certification online can be a flexible and affordable route to a rewarding career supporting people with behavioral needs.

Fast-track options are also available. Online social work programs with accelerated formats let students enter the workforce sooner. Likewise, accelerated psychology programs can help you quickly gain credentials that are relevant to both clinical and research careers in neuroscience.

By combining neuroscience with these related degrees, students can enhance their expertise and prepare for diverse roles in research, healthcare, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Paul L. Furlong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles