World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrick J. Osswald

Patrick J. Osswald

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 35 2620 2455 88 83 88 6315

Patrick J. Osswald publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patrick J. Osswald between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patrick J. Osswald published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2017. 8 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2017. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications
2006 2025

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patrick J. Osswald: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 3
2008 3
2009 7
2010 8
2011 3
2012 3
2013 8
2014 13
2015 13
2016 17
2017 21
2018 12
2019 9
2020 2
2021 9
2022 14
2023 2
2024 5
2025 3
Total 156
Download as CSV

Patrick J. Osswald publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick J. Osswald sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 87–96 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 88 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67 88
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Patrick J. Osswald D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick J. Osswald sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158 35
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Alcohol combustion chemistry

    S. Mani Sarathy;Patrick Oßwald;Nils Hansen;Katharina Kohse-Höinghaus

  • A comprehensive chemical kinetic combustion model for the four butanol isomers

    S. Mani Sarathy;Stijn Vranckx;Kenji Yasunaga;Marco Mehl

  • Lithium plating in lithium-ion batteries investigated by voltage relaxation and in situ neutron diffraction

    Christian von Lüders;Veronika Zinth;Simon V. Erhard;Patrick J. Osswald

  • Combustion of butanol isomers – A detailed molecular beam mass spectrometry investigation of their flame chemistry

    Patrick Oßwald;Hanna Güldenberg;Katharina Kohse-Höinghaus;Bin Yang;Bin Yang

  • A detailed chemical kinetic reaction mechanism for oxidation of four small alkyl esters in laminar premixed flames

    C.K. Westbrook;W.J. Pitz;P.R. Westmoreland;F.L. Dryer

  • Sampling Probe Influences on Temperature and Species Concentrations in Molecular Beam Mass Spectroscopic Investigations of Flat Premixed Low-pressure Flames

    Ulf Struckmeier;Patrick Oßwald;Tina Kasper;Lena Böhling

  • Detailed mass spectrometric and modeling study of isomeric butene flames

    Marina Schenk;Larisa Leon;Kai Moshammer;Patrick Oßwald

  • Isomer-specific fuel destruction pathways in rich flames of methyl acetate and ethyl formate and consequences for the combustion chemistry of esters.

    Patrick Osswald;Ulf Struckmeier;Tina Kasper;Katharina Kohse-Höinghaus

  • Detailed kinetic modeling of the combustion of the four butanol isomers in premixed low-pressure flames

    Alessio Frassoldati;Roberto Grana;Tiziano Faravelli;Eliseo Ranzi

  • Combustion chemistry of the propanol isomers ― investigated by electron ionization and VUV-photoionization molecular-beam mass spectrometry

    T. Kasper;T. Kasper;P. Oßwald;U. Struckmeier;K. Kohse-Höinghaus

  • Experimental and numerical low-temperature oxidation study of ethanol and dimethyl ether

    Friederike Herrmann;Bernhard Jochim;Patrick Oßwald;Liming Cai

  • Isomer-specific influences on the composition of reaction intermediates in dimethyl ether/propene and ethanol/propene flame.

    Juan Wang;Ulf Struckmeier;Bin Yang;Terrill A. Cool

  • Fast and Accurate Measurement of Entropy Profiles of Commercial Lithium-Ion Cells

    Patrick J. Osswald;Manuel del Rosario;Jürgen Garche;Andreas Jossen

  • Multi-directional laser scanning as innovative method to detect local cell damage during fast charging of lithium-ion cells

    Bernhard Rieger;Simon F. Schuster;Simon V. Erhard;Patrick J. Osswald

  • Composition of reaction intermediates for stoichiometric and fuel-rich dimethyl ether flames: flame-sampling mass spectrometry and modeling studies.

    Juan Wang;Marcos Chaos;Bin Yang;Terrill A. Cool

  • Fuel-structure dependence of benzene formation processes in premixed flames fueled by C6H12 isomers

    Nils Hansen;Tina Kasper;Bin Yang;Terrill A. Cool

  • Simulation and Measurement of the Current Density Distribution in Lithium-Ion Batteries by a Multi-Tab Cell Approach

    Simon V. Erhard;Patrick J. Osswald;Peter Keil;Eike Höffer

  • Combustion Chemistry of the Butane Isomers in Premixed Low-Pressure Flames

    Patrick Oßwald;Katharina Kohse-Höinghaus;Ulf Struckmeier;Thomas Zeuch

  • Current density distribution in cylindrical Li-Ion cells during impedance measurements

    Patrick J. Osswald;Simon V. Erhard;Andreas Noel;Peter Keil

  • Combustion kinetics of alternative jet fuels, Part-II: Reaction model for fuel surrogate

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen Technical University of Munich
Paolo Lugli
Paolo Lugli Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Wolfgang Schuhmann
Wolfgang Schuhmann Ruhr University Bochum
Wolfgang Porod
Wolfgang Porod University of Notre Dame
Alois Knoll
Alois Knoll Technical University of Munich
Ralph Gilles
Ralph Gilles Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering can open doors to a variety of related online degrees and career options. For those interested in expanding their expertise, understanding different professional pathways is essential. For example, careers in behavioral sciences or counseling often complement technical skills, and learning about the how to become a criminal profiler provides valuable insight into specialized roles that blend analysis with human behavior.

If you're considering further education or pivoting your career, it's helpful to know the distinct type of counselors and what degree paths align with your interests. For those seeking less demanding options to balance alongside engineering studies, exploring which counseling degree is easiest might provide suitable alternatives with flexible requirements.

Additionally, professionals aiming for swift advancement can benefit from programs like the fast track ABA masters online, which offers intensive training in applied behavior analysis, complementing technical fields with behavioral expertise. Integrating skills from these diverse degrees can create unique career pathways bridging engineering, behavioral science, and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick J. Osswald

Recently Published Articles