World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
37
Citations
4859
World Ranking
2428
National Ranking
871

Andrew M. Colclasure publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew M. Colclasure sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 155 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Andrew M. Colclasure D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew M. Colclasure sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Calendar aging of silicon-containing batteries

    Josefine D. McBrayer;Josefine D. McBrayer;Marco-Tulio F. Rodrigues;Maxwell C. Schulze;Daniel P. Abraham

  • Requirements for Enabling Extreme Fast Charging of High Energy Density Li-Ion Cells while Avoiding Lithium Plating

    Andrew M. Colclasure;Alison R. Dunlop;Stephen E. Trask;Bryant J. Polzin

  • Spatial dynamics of lithiation and lithium plating during high-rate operation of graphite electrodes

    Donal P. Finegan;Alexander Quinn;David S. Wragg;Andrew M. Colclasure

  • Resolving the discrepancy in tortuosity factor estimation for Li-Ion battery electrodes through micro-macro modeling and experiment

    Francois L. E. Usseglio-Viretta;Andrew Colclasure;Aashutosh N. Mistry;Koffi Pierre Yao Claver

  • A Review of Existing and Emerging Methods for Lithium Detection and Characterization in Li‐Ion and Li‐Metal Batteries

    Partha P. Paul;Eric J. McShane;Andrew M. Colclasure;Nitash Balsara

  • Modeling Electrochemical Oxidation of Hydrogen on Ni–YSZ Pattern Anodes

    David G. Goodwin;Huayang Zhu;Andrew M. Colclasure;Robert J. Kee

  • Modeling detailed chemistry and transport for solid-electrolyte-interface (SEI) films in Li–ion batteries

    Andrew M. Colclasure;Kandler A. Smith;Robert J. Kee

  • Electrode scale and electrolyte transport effects on extreme fast charging of lithium-ion cells

    Andrew M. Colclasure;Tanvir R. Tanim;Andrew N. Jansen;Stephen E. Trask

  • Degradation mechanisms of high capacity 18650 cells containing Si-graphite anode and nickel-rich NMC cathode

    Xuemin Li;Andrew M. Colclasure;Donal P. Finegan;Dongsheng Ren

  • Thermodynamically consistent modeling of elementary electrochemistry in lithium-ion batteries

    Unknown

  • Three-dimensional particle-resolved models of Li-ion batteries to assist the evaluation of empirical parameters in one-dimensional models

    Unknown

  • Quantification of Inactive Lithium and Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) Species on Graphite Electrodes After Fast Charging

    Eric J. McShane;Eric J. McShane;Andrew M. Colclasure;David E. Brown;David E. Brown;Zachary M. Konz;Zachary M. Konz

  • Laser ablation of Li-ion electrodes for fast charging: Material properties, rate capability, Li plating, and wetting

    Unknown

  • A Comprehensive Understanding of the Aging Effects of Extreme Fast Charging on High Ni NMC Cathode

    Unknown

  • High-throughput Li plating quantification for fast-charging battery design

    Unknown

  • Developing extreme fast charge battery protocols – A review spanning materials to systems

    Unknown

  • Extended cycle life implications of fast charging for lithium-ion battery cathode

    Tanvir R. Tanim;Zhenzhen Yang;Andrew M. Colclasure;Parameswara R. Chinnam

  • Fingerprinting Redox Heterogeneity in Electrodes during Extreme Fast Charging

    Aashutosh Mistry;Francois L. E. Usseglio-Viretta;Andrew Colclasure;Kandler Smith

  • Model-Instructed Design of Novel Charging Protocols for the Extreme Fast Charging of Lithium-Ion Batteries Without Lithium Plating

    Weijie Mai;Andrew M. Colclasure;Kandler Smith

  • Enabling fast charging of lithium-ion batteries through secondary- /dual- pore network: Part I - Analytical diffusion model

    F.L.E. Usseglio-Viretta;W. Mai;A.M. Colclasure;M. Doeff

Frequent Co-Authors

Kandler Smith
Kandler Smith National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Andrew N. Jansen
Andrew N. Jansen Argonne National Laboratory
Donal P. Finegan
Donal P. Finegan National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Robert J. Kee
Robert J. Kee Colorado School of Mines
Bryan D. McCloskey
Bryan D. McCloskey University of California, Berkeley
Ira Bloom
Ira Bloom Argonne National Laboratory
Daniel P. Abraham
Daniel P. Abraham Argonne National Laboratory
Huayang Zhu
Huayang Zhu Colorado School of Mines
Partha P. Mukherjee
Partha P. Mukherjee Purdue University West Lafayette
Anthony K. Burrell
Anthony K. Burrell National Renewable Energy Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways alongside Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. If you're interested in fields that complement engineering, understanding different program requirements and accessibility is crucial. For example, those considering a transition into counseling might want to look into what is the easiest counseling degree to determine the most straightforward entry point. This helps in balancing workload and career changes efficiently.

Similarly, accelerated programs such as the accelerated bcba program online offer fast-tracked options for specialized certification in behavior analysis, a growing field connected to human factors that can be useful for aerospace engineers interested in ergonomics or user experience.

For those leaning toward speech sciences, understanding speech pathology grad school acceptance rates is vital for realistic goal setting. Likewise, looking into the easiest slp masters programs to get into can offer insights into accessible graduate programs with less competitive entry barriers, which may appeal to students pivoting from technical fields.

Understanding these pathways helps engineering students diversify their skills and career options, making informed decisions for long-term professional growth.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew M. Colclasure