World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Materials Science

D-Index
60
Citations
18187
World Ranking
6931
National Ranking
1743

Chemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
17992
World Ranking
9547
National Ranking
2683

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
60
Citations
17986
World Ranking
2136
National Ranking
677

David L. Wood publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Wood sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 162 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

David L. Wood D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Wood sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

David L. Wood is affiliated with Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on engineering, with a significant emphasis on electrical and electronic engineering, automotive engineering, mechanical engineering, renewable energy, sustainability, and materials chemistry.

The scientist's main topics of work include advancements in battery materials, advanced battery materials and technologies, advanced battery technologies research, extraction and separation processes, fuel cells and related materials, electrocatalysts for energy conversion, and recycling and waste management techniques.

David L. Wood has contributed to multiple publications in various scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Power Sources
  • ECS Meeting Abstracts
  • ACS Energy Letters
  • Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
  • ACS Applied Energy Materials

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by David L. Wood are:

  • "Water-Based Electrode Manufacturing and Direct Recycling of Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes-A Green and Sustainable Manufacturing System," 2020, iScience
  • "Lithium and transition metal dissolution due to aqueous processing in lithium-ion battery cathode active materials," 2020, Journal of Power Sources
  • "Towards Understanding of Cracking during Drying of Thick Aqueous-Processed LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 Cathodes," 2020, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
  • "Perspectives on the relationship between materials chemistry and roll-to-roll electrode manufacturing for high-energy lithium-ion batteries," 2020, Energy Storage Materials
  • "On electrolyte wetting through lithium-ion battery separators," 2020, Extreme Mechanics Letters

Frequent coauthors in their research work include Jianlin Li, Ilias Belharouak, Anand Parejiya, Ruhul Amin, and Rachid Essehli.

Best Publications

  • Scientific aspects of polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability and degradation.

    Rodney Borup;Jeremy Meyers;Bryan Pivovar;Yu Seung Kim

  • The state of understanding of the lithium-ion-battery graphite solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and its relationship to formation cycling

    Seong Jin An;Seong Jin An;Jianlin Li;Claus Daniel;Claus Daniel;Debasish Mohanty

  • Prospects for reducing the processing cost of lithium ion batteries

    David L. Wood;Jianlin Li;Claus Daniel

  • PEM fuel cell electrocatalyst durability measurements

    Rod L. Borup;John R. Davey;Fernando H. Garzon;David L Wood;David L Wood

  • Structural transformation of a lithium-rich Li1.2Co0.1Mn0.55Ni0.15O2 cathode during high voltage cycling resolved by in situ X-ray diffraction

    Debasish Mohanty;Sergiy Kalnaus;Roberta A. Meisner;Kevin J. Rhodes

  • Durability of PEFCs at High Humidity Conditions

    Jian Xie;David L. Wood;David L. Wood;David M. Wayne;Thomas A. Zawodzinski

  • Microstructural Changes of Membrane Electrode Assemblies during PEFC Durability Testing at High Humidity Conditions

    Jian Xie;David L. Wood;David L. Wood;Karren L. More;Plamen Atanassov

  • Materials processing for lithium-ion batteries

    Jianlin Li;Claus Daniel;Claus Daniel;David L Wood Iii

  • Effect of direct liquid water injection and interdigitated flow field on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells

    David L. Wood;Jung S. Yi;Trung Van Nguyen

  • Unraveling the Voltage-Fade Mechanism in High-Energy-Density Lithium-Ion Batteries: Origin of the Tetrahedral Cations for Spinel Conversion

    Debasish Mohanty;Jianlin Li;Daniel P. Abraham;Ashfia Huq

  • Toward Low-Cost, High-Energy Density, and High-Power Density Lithium-Ion Batteries

    Jianlin Li;Jianlin Li;Zhijia Du;Rose E. Ruther;Seong Jin An;Seong Jin An

  • Understanding limiting factors in thick electrode performance as applied to high energy density Li-ion batteries

    Zhijia Du;D. L. Wood;C. Daniel;S. Kalnaus

  • Technical and economic analysis of solvent-based lithium-ion electrode drying with water and NMP

    David L. Wood;Jeffrey D. Quass;Jianlin Li;Shabbir Ahmed

  • Modification of Ni-Rich FCG NMC and NCA Cathodes by Atomic Layer Deposition: Preventing Surface Phase Transitions for High-Voltage Lithium-Ion Batteries

    Debasish Mohanty;Kevin Dahlberg;David M. King;Lamuel A. David

  • Chemical stability and long-term cell performance of low-cobalt, Ni-Rich cathodes prepared by aqueous processing for high-energy Li-Ion batteries

    Marissa Wood;Jianlin Li;Rose E. Ruther;Zhijia Du

  • Effect of electrode manufacturing defects on electrochemical performance of lithium-ion batteries: Cognizance of the battery failure sources

    D. Mohanty;E. Hockaday;J. Li;D.K. Hensley

  • Fast formation cycling for lithium ion batteries

    Seong Jin An;Seong Jin An;Jianlin Li;Zhijia Du;Claus Daniel;Claus Daniel

  • Investigating phase transformation in the Li1.2Co0.1Mn0.55Ni0.15O2 lithium-ion battery cathode during high-voltage hold (4.5 V) via magnetic, X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy studies

    Debasish Mohanty;Athena S. Sefat;Sergiy Kalnaus;Jianlin Li

  • Enabling aqueous processing for crack-free thick electrodes

    Zhijia Du;K.M. Rollag;K.M. Rollag;J. Li;S.J. An;S.J. An

  • Nafion structural phenomena at platinum and carbon interfaces.

    David L. Wood;Jerzy Chlistunoff;Jaroslaw Majewski;Rodney L. Borup

Frequent Co-Authors

Claus Daniel
Claus Daniel Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Ilias Belharouak
Ilias Belharouak Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Harry M. Meyer
Harry M. Meyer Oak Ridge National Laboratory
E. Andrew Payzant
E. Andrew Payzant Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Ira Bloom
Ira Bloom Argonne National Laboratory
Gabriel M. Veith
Gabriel M. Veith Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Jane Y. Howe
Jane Y. Howe University of Toronto
Partha P. Mukherjee
Partha P. Mukherjee Purdue University West Lafayette
Karren L. More
Karren L. More Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Daniel P. Abraham
Daniel P. Abraham Argonne National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Engineering and Technology opens doors to a wide range of career opportunities. However, you may also want to consider complementary paths that offer flexibility, practical skills, and diverse job prospects—especially those available through online study.

Many students find it beneficial to pair their technical background with programs like paralegal online programs. These courses provide legal knowledge that can be valuable in industries involving patents and intellectual property. For those interested in business finance or entrepreneurship, taking bookkeeping courses can give you essential skills to manage finances within tech firms or startups.

If you’re looking to enhance your organizational or administrative skills, an associate in office administration can prepare you for roles in project management or operational support alongside your technical expertise. Alternatively, a business administration online degree can help engineers move into leadership or management positions.

Exploring these online options can broaden your career pathways and make you a more versatile candidate in today’s dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing David L. Wood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles