World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrick F. Sheedy

Patrick F. Sheedy

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
19091
World Ranking
18523
National Ranking
9232

Patrick F. Sheedy publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick F. Sheedy sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 214 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Patrick F. Sheedy D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick F. Sheedy sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick F. Sheedy is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their research and professional activities are rooted in this institution, which is known for its contributions to medical science and healthcare.

Available data does not list recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or detailed fields of study for Patrick F. Sheedy. There is no record of book publications or awards attributed to this individual at this time.

Due to the lack of additional specific information, it is not possible to provide details on research topics, publication history, or collaborative networks associated with Patrick F. Sheedy. The scientific profile is therefore limited to affiliation and professional identification.

Best Publications

  • Coronary Artery Calcium Area by Electron-Beam Computed Tomography and Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Area A Histopathologic Correlative Study

    J A Rumberger;D B Simons;L A Fitzpatrick;P F Sheedy

  • Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the thoracic aorta: natural history and clinicopathologic correlations.

    Anthony W. Stanson;Francis J. Kazmier;Larry H. Hollier;William D. Edwards

  • Prevalence and Predictors of Coronary Artery Calcification in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

    Rose C. Christian;Daniel A. Dumesic;Thomas Behrenbeck;Ann L. Oberg

  • Evaluation and Clinical Implications of Aortic Valve Calcification Measured by Electron-Beam Computed Tomography

    David Messika-Zeitoun;Marie Christine Aubry;Delphine Detaint;Lawrence F. Bielak

  • Long-Term Prognostic Value of Coronary Calcification Detected by Electron-Beam Computed Tomography in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography

    Paul C. Keelan;Lawrence F. Bielak;Khalid Ashai;Lama S. Jamjoum

  • Measurement of abdominal and visceral fat with computed tomography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

    Michael D. Jensen;Jill A. Kanaley;Judd E. Reed;Patrick F. Sheedy

  • Noninvasive definition of anatomic coronary artery disease by ultrafast computed tomographic scanning: A quantitative pathologic comparison study

    D.Brent Simons;Robert S. Schwartz;William D. Edwards;Patrick F. Sheedy

  • Hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: Clinical, pathologic, and radiologic features

    P. Kerlin;G.L. Davis;D.B. McGill;L.H. Weiland

  • Coronary artery calcification detected with ultrafast CT as an indication of coronary artery disease

    J F Breen;P F Sheedy nd;R S Schwartz;A W Stanson

  • Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium score cutpoints and severity of associated angiographic lumen stenosis.

    John A Rumberger;Patrick F Sheedy;Jerome F Breen;Robert S Schwartz

  • CT-guided biopsy: prospective analysis of 1,000 procedures.

    T J Welch;P F Sheedy;C D Johnson;C M Johnson

  • Coronary calcium, as determined by electron beam computed tomography, and coronary disease on arteriogram. Effect of patient's sex on diagnosis.

    John A. Rumberger;Patrick F. Sheedy;Jerome F. Breen;Robert S. Schwartz

  • Renal Artery Angioplasty: Technical Results and Clinical Outcome in 320 Patients

    Frank S. Bonelli;Michael A. McKusick;Stephen C. Textor;Paul B. Kos

  • PERCUTANEOUS ADRENAL BIOPSY : REVIEW OF A 10-YEAR EXPERIENCE

    T J Welch;P F Sheedy;D H Stephens;C M Johnson

  • Relation of coronary calcium determined by electron beam computed tomography and lumen narrowing determined by autopsy

    John A. Rumberger;Robert S. Schwartz;D.Brent Simons;Patrick F. Sheedy

  • Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: comparison of angiography, CT, US, and scintigraphy.

    T J Welch;P F Sheedy;C M Johnson;D H Stephens

  • Localization of pancreatic insulinoma: comparison of pre- and intraoperative US with CT and angiography.

    A K Galiber;C C Reading;J W Charboneau;P F Sheedy

  • Intravenous Electron-Beam Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography for Segmental Analysis of Coronary Artery Stenoses ☆

    Axel Schmermund;Benno J Rensing;Patrick F Sheedy;Malcolm R Bell

  • Measuring leg muscle and fat mass in humans: comparison of CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

    James A. Levine;Lana Abboud;Mitchel Barry;Judd E. Reed

  • Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the thoracic aorta: natural history and clinicopathologic correlations@@@Ulceras arteriosclerosas aorticas perforantes: historia natural y correlacion clinico-patologica

    Anthony W. Stanson;Francis J. Kazmier;Larry H. Hollier;William D. Edwards

Frequent Co-Authors

Patricia A. Peyser
Patricia A. Peyser University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lawrence F. Bielak
Lawrence F. Bielak University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lilach O. Lerman
Lilach O. Lerman Mayo Clinic
Sharon L.R. Kardia
Sharon L.R. Kardia University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alan R. Shuldiner
Alan R. Shuldiner University of Maryland, Baltimore
Kent R. Bailey
Kent R. Bailey Mayo Clinic
Eric Boerwinkle
Eric Boerwinkle The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Erik L. Ritman
Erik L. Ritman Mayo Clinic
Braxton D. Mitchell
Braxton D. Mitchell University of Maryland, Baltimore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine opens doors to numerous online pathways and specialized roles. Many nurses looking to advance choose rn to np bridge programs, which provide a flexible route to becoming a nurse practitioner with greater responsibilities and earning potential.

For those interested in promoting health beyond the hospital, an online dietitian degree offers training in nutritional science and opportunities to become a licensed dietitian, a field in growing demand.

Leadership roles are also accessible with advanced degrees. Prospective healthcare administrators often seek out programs that are recognized for their quality, such as those found on the list of which online healthcare administration programs have cahme accreditation? This accreditation ensures rigorous standards and better employment prospects.

Additionally, working registered nurses seeking career advancement may benefit from online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements. These options can help build skills and credentials while accommodating busy schedules.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick F. Sheedy

Recently Published Articles