World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ole Ammerpohl

Ole Ammerpohl

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
46
Citations
15570
World Ranking
4138
National Ranking
276

Ole Ammerpohl publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ole Ammerpohl sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 162 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Ole Ammerpohl D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ole Ammerpohl sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ole Ammerpohl is affiliated with the University of Ulm in Germany. Their research spans several areas of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a strong focus on medicine. The scientist's work includes a considerable number of publications related to molecular biology and cancer research, as well as pathology and forensic medicine, oncology, and genetics.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cancer-related gene regulation
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Viral-associated cancers and disorders

Ammerpohl's recent papers illustrate a focus on human cancer genomics and related molecular characterizations. Selected publications include:

  • The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer, 2020, Nature
  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes, 2020, Nature
  • Comprehensive molecular characterization of mitochondrial genomes in human cancers, 2020, Nature Genetics
  • The landscape of viral associations in human cancers, 2020, Nature Genetics
  • A deep learning system accurately classifies primary and metastatic cancers using passenger mutation patterns, 2020, Nature Communications

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Ammerpohl feature researchers such as Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Malik Alawi, Fátima Al-Shahrour, David J. Adams, and Gurnit Atwal. The number of collaborations ranges from sixteen to nineteen joint publications with these individuals.

Publication venues where Ammerpohl commonly contributes include:

  • Nature Communications
  • Nature
  • Nature Genetics
  • Leukemia
  • Clinical Epigenetics

Ammerpohl's research combines expertise in cancer genomics, epigenetics, and RNA biology to explore complex mechanisms involved in cancer development, diagnosis, and treatment. Their multidisciplinary approach integrates molecular biology techniques, computational methods, and clinical relevance, contributing to the understanding of cancer genomics landscapes and molecular signatures.

Best Publications

  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes

    Peter J. Campbell;Gad Getz;Jan O. Korbel;Joshua M. Stuart

  • The landscape of genomic alterations across childhood cancers

    Susanne N. Gröbner;Barbara C. Worst;Joachim Weischenfeldt;Joachim Weischenfeldt;Ivo Buchhalter

  • Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes

    Yilong Li;Nicola D Roberts;Jeremiah A Wala;Jeremiah A Wala;Ofer Shapira;Ofer Shapira

  • Epigenome-wide association study of body mass index, and the adverse outcomes of adiposity

    Simone Wahl;Alexander Drong;Benjamin Lehne;Marie Loh;Marie Loh;Marie Loh

  • Obesity accelerates epigenetic aging of human liver

    Steve Horvath;Wiebke Erhart;Mario Brosch;Ole Ammerpohl

  • DNA Methylation Analysis in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Suggests Distinct Disease-Specific and Remodeling Signatures after Bariatric Surgery

    Markus Ahrens;Ole Ammerpohl;Witigo von Schönfels;Julia Kolarova

  • Recurrent mutation of the ID3 gene in Burkitt lymphoma identified by integrated genome, exome and transcriptome sequencing

    Julia Richter;Matthias Schlesner;Steve Hoffmann;Markus Kreuz

  • Epigenome-wide association of DNA methylation markers in peripheral blood from Indian Asians and Europeans with incident type 2 diabetes: a nested case-control study.

    John C Chambers;Marie Loh;Marie Loh;Marie Loh;Benjamin Lehne;Alexander Drong

  • Foxp3 expression in pancreatic carcinoma cells as a novel mechanism of immune evasion in cancer.

    Sebastian Hinz;Laia Pagerols-Raluy;Hans-Heinrich Oberg;Ole Ammerpohl

  • Detection of tumor stem cell markers in pancreatic carcinoma cell lines.

    Monika Olempska;Patricia Alice Eisenach;Ole Ammerpohl;Hendrik Ungefroren

  • Gene expression profiling of microdissected pancreatic ductal carcinomas using high-density DNA microarrays.

    Robert Grützmann;Christian Pilarsky;Ole Ammerpohl;Jutta Lüttges

  • Meta-analysis of microarray data on pancreatic cancer defines a set of commonly dysregulated genes

    Robert Grützmann;Hinnerk Boriss;Ole Ammerpohl;Jutta Lüttges

  • Global DNA methylation in fetal human germ cells and germ cell tumours: association with differentiation and cisplatin resistance

    Hendrik Wermann;Hendrik Wermann;Hans Stoop;Ad J M Gillis;Friedemann Honecker

  • New insights into the biology and origin of mature aggressive B-cell lymphomas by combined epigenomic, genomic, and transcriptional profiling

    José I. Martín-Subero;Markus Kreuz;Marina Bibikova;Stefan Bentink

  • The human retinoblastoma gene is imprinted.

    Deniz Kanber;Tea Berulava;Ole Ammerpohl;Diana Mitter

  • ADAM9 expression in pancreatic cancer is associated with tumour type and is a prognostic factor in ductal adenocarcinoma

    R Grützmann;J Lüttges;B Sipos;O Ammerpohl

  • The Minimal Repression Domain of MBD2b Overlaps with the Methyl-CpG-binding Domain and Binds Directly to Sin3A

    Joern Boeke;Ole Ammerpohl;Simone Kegel;Udo Moehren

  • A Comprehensive Microarray-Based DNA Methylation Study of 367 Hematological Neoplasms

    Jose Ignacio Martin-Subero;Ole Ammerpohl;Marina Bibikova;Eliza Wickham-Garcia

  • DNA methylome analysis in Burkitt and follicular lymphomas identifies differentially methylated regions linked to somatic mutation and transcriptional control

    Helene Kretzmer;Stephan H. Bernhart;Wei Wang;Andrea Haake

  • Recurrent mutation of JAK3 in T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia

    Anke K. Bergmann;Sina Schneppenheim;Marc Seifert;Matthew J. Betts

Frequent Co-Authors

Reiner Siebert
Reiner Siebert University of Ulm
Wolfram Klapper
Wolfram Klapper Kiel University
Bence Sipos
Bence Sipos University of Tübingen
Torsten Goldmann
Torsten Goldmann Research Center Borstel - Leibniz-Center for Medicine and Biosciences
Ralf Küppers
Ralf Küppers University of Duisburg-Essen
Roland Eils
Roland Eils Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Stefan Schreiber
Stefan Schreiber Kiel University
Philip Rosenstiel
Philip Rosenstiel Kiel University
Peter Lichter
Peter Lichter German Cancer Research Center
Jochen Hampe
Jochen Hampe TU Dresden

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics can open doors to a variety of healthcare and science careers, both directly in research and in broader medical fields. For those seeking a quick transition into the healthcare industry, online degrees in related areas offer flexibility, affordability, and a range of career options.

Genetics students frequently consider entry-level roles like medical billing and coding, which can be pursued without extensive scientific backgrounds. If you're curious about tuition costs, learn how much does it cost to become a medical coder through accessible online programs.

Another popular pathway is nursing. Students looking for practical programs with straightforward entry requirements can explore nursing programs easy to get into. These courses often accept students from a variety of academic backgrounds, including those with genetic sciences experience.

If you desire leadership roles, earning online healthcare degrees can help you transition into management positions within medical and research organizations. For those who want an affordable option, check out the cheapest mha programs online to advance your education without breaking the bank.

Each pathway builds valuable skills and provides a unique entry into the rapidly growing healthcare sector, complementing a foundation in genetics.

Best Scientists Citing Ole Ammerpohl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles