World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
45
Citations
6749
World Ranking
16528
National Ranking
4106

Norman F.H. Ho publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norman F.H. Ho sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 118 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Norman F.H. Ho D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norman F.H. Ho sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Norman F.H. Ho was affiliated with Pfizer in the United States during their scientific career. The information available indicates that they conducted research within the pharmaceutical industry, contributing to the body of work associated with this sector.

There are no specific papers listed for Norman F.H. Ho, and no records of frequent co-authors or frequent publication venues are available. Similarly, no data has been provided related to book publications or the fields and subfields of study that may have characterized their research.

Without listed main topics of work or awards won, it is not possible to detail particular areas of scientific focus or recognition. The lack of publicly available documents or records of contributions limits the ability to outline specific elements of their research profile.

The scientist has been identified as deceased. This profile reflects the information available at the time of data compilation and is presented without interpretative commentary or subjective judgments.

Best Publications

  • The Influence of Peptide Structure on Transport Across Caco-2 Cells

    Robert A. Conradi;Allen R. Hilgers;Norman F. H. Ho;Philip S. Burton

  • Quantitative Approaches To Delineate Paracellular Diffusion in Cultured Epithelial Cell Monolayers

    Anthony Adson;Thomas J. Raub;Philip S. Burton;Craig L. Barsuhn

  • Quantitative mechanistic studies in simultaneous fluid flow and intestinal absorption using steroids as model solutes

    I. Komiya;J.Y. Park;A. Kamani;N.F.H. Ho

  • The influence of peptide structure on transport across Caco-2 cells. II. Peptide bond modification which results in improved permeability.

    Robert A. Conradi;Alien R. Hilgers;Norman F. H. Ho;Philip S. Burton

  • Paracellular Diffusion in Caco-2 Cell Monolayers: Effect of Perturbation on the Transport of Hydrophilic Compounds That Vary in Charge and Size

    Gregory T. Knipp;Norman F.H. Ho;Craig L. Barsuhn;Ronald T. Borchardt

  • How Structural Features Influence the Biomembrane Permeability of Peptides

    Philip S. Burton;Robert A. Conradi;Norman F.H. Ho;Allen R. Hilgers

  • Theoretical and experimental studies of transport of micelle‐solubilized solutes

    Gregory E. Amidon;William I. Higuchi;Norman F.H. Ho

  • Passive Diffusion of Weak Organic Electrolytes across Caco‐2 Cell Monolayers: Uncoupling the Contributions of Hydrodynamic, Transcellular, and Paracellular Barriers

    Anthony Adson;Philip S. Burton;Thomas J. Raub;Craig L. Barsuhn

  • Mechanistic Roles of Neutral Surfactants on Concurrent Polarized and Passive Membrane Transport of a Model Peptide in Caco-2 Cells

    Manoj M. Nerurkar;Norman F.H. Ho;Philip S. Burton;Thomas J. Vidmar

  • Influence of liposomal drug entrapment on percutaneous absorption

    Madurai G. Ganesan;Norman D. Weiner;Gordon L. Flynn;N. F. H. Ho

  • Hydration and percutaneous absorption: i. Influence of hydration on alkanol permeation through hairless mouse skin.

    Charanjit R. Behl;Gordon L. Flynn;Tamie Kurihara;Nancy Harper

  • The relationship between peptide structure and transport across epithelial cell monolayers

    Philip S. Burton;Robert A. Conradi;Allen R. Hilgers;Norman F.H. Ho

  • Theoretical Model Studies of Drug Absorption and Transport in the Gastrointestinal Tract I

    Akira Suzuki;W.I. Higuchi;N.F.H. Ho

  • Increased Lipophilicity and Subsequent Cell Partitioning Decrease Passive Transcellular Diffusion of Novel, Highly Lipophilic Antioxidants

    Geri A. Sawada;Craig L. Barsuhn;Barry S. Lutzke;Michael E. Houghton

  • Physicochemical determinants of passive membrane permeability: role of solute hydrogen-bonding potential and volume.

    Jay T. Goodwin;Robert A. Conradi;Norman F. H. Ho;Philip S. Burton

  • Physical model evaluation of topical prodrug delivery—simultaneous transport and bioconversion of vidarabine‐5′‐valerate I: Physical model development

    Cheng Der Yu;Jeffrey L. Fox;Norman F.H. Ho;William I. Higuchi

  • Physical Model Evaluation of Topical Prodrug Delivery—simultaneous Transport and Biocnversion of Vidarabine-5′-valerate II: Parameter Determinations

    Cheng Der Yu;Jeffrey L. Fox;Norman F.H. Ho;William I. Higuchi

  • Biophysical transport properties of the cuticle of Ascaris suum.

    Norman F.H. Ho;Timothy G. Geary;Thomas J. Raub;Craig L. Barsuhn

  • Predictions of the particle size distribution changes in emulsions and suspensions by digital computation

    Akira Suzuki;N.F.H Ho;W.I Higuchi

  • Use of a Biophysical-Kinetic Model to Understand the Roles of Protein Binding and Membrane Partitioning on Passive Diffusion of Highly Lipophilic Molecules Across Cellular Barriers

    Thomas Raub;Craig Barsuhn;Lawrence Williams;Douglas Decker

Frequent Co-Authors

William I. Higuchi
William I. Higuchi University of Utah
Gordon L. Flynn
Gordon L. Flynn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Timothy G. Geary
Timothy G. Geary McGill University
Ronald T. Borchardt
Ronald T. Borchardt University of Kansas
Kenneth L. Audus
Kenneth L. Audus University of Kansas
Deborah L. Gumucio
Deborah L. Gumucio University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
George Zografi
George Zografi University of Wisconsin–Madison
Alan F. Hofmann
Alan F. Hofmann University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways beyond traditional lab roles. Many students are exploring specialized fields like forensic science, which combines chemistry, biology, and criminal justice. Pursuing a forensic science degree online is an accessible option, allowing students to gain essential skills while balancing other commitments.

For those interested in the intersection of psychology and criminal investigation, forensic psychology graduate programs online offer advanced knowledge on behavioral analysis and mental health. This path is particularly relevant for chemistry graduates interested in profiling and criminal behavior studies.

Chemistry skills also feed into career roles such as an autopsy technician, where scientific expertise supports medical examiners in analyzing evidence. This role provides a practical application for chemistry principles in a forensic context.

For a broader view of professional options, check out various careers in forensic science. These encompass roles in crime labs, law enforcement agencies, and research institutions, highlighting the value of a chemistry background in multiple forensic disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Norman F.H. Ho