World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nina Heinrichs

Nina Heinrichs

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
7492
World Ranking
10378
National Ranking
497

Nina Heinrichs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina Heinrichs sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 245 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nina Heinrichs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina Heinrichs sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling: Effectiveness and Moderating Variables

    Christoph Nowak;Nina Heinrichs

  • The liebowitz social anxiety scale as a self-report instrument: a preliminary psychometric analysis.

    Sandra L Baker;Nina Heinrichs;Hyo-Jin Kim;Stefan G Hofmann

  • Parent Recruitment and Retention in a Universal Prevention Program for Child Behavior and Emotional Problems: Barriers to Research and Program Participation

    Nina Heinrichs;Heike Bertram;Annett Kuschel;Kurt Hahlweg

  • Information processing in social phobia: a critical review.

    Nina Heinrichs;Stefan G Hofmann

  • Cultural differences in perceived social norms and social anxiety.

    Nina Heinrichs;Ronald M. Rapee;Lynn A. Alden;Susan Bögels

  • The nature and expression of social phobia: toward a new classification.

    Stefan G. Hofmann;Nina Heinrichs;David A. Moscovitch

  • Social anxiety and social norms in individualistic and collectivistic countries

    Sina Simone Schreier;Nina Heinrichs;Lynn Alden;Ronald M. Rapee

  • Cancer Distress Reduction with a Couple-Based Skills Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Nina Heinrichs;Tanja Zimmermann;Birgit Huber;Peter Herschbach

  • Prävention kindlicher Verhaltensstörungen

    Nina Heinrichs;Heike Saßmann;Kurt Hahlweg;Meinrad Perrez

  • The Effects of Two Different Incentives on Recruitment Rates of Families into a Prevention Program

    Nina Heinrichs

  • Subjective, Autonomic, and Endocrine Reactivity during Social Stress in Children with Social Phobia

    Martina Krämer;Wiebke Lina Seefeldt;Nina Heinrichs;Brunna Tuschen-Caffier

  • Restricted Autonomic Flexibility in Children with Social Phobia.

    Julian Schmitz;Martina Krämer;Brunna Tuschen-Caffier;Nina Heinrichs

  • "Does one size fit all?" moderators in psychosocial interventions for breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

    Tanja Zimmermann;Nina Heinrichs;Donald H. Baucom

  • Individual and dyadic predictors of body image in women with breast cancer

    Tanja Zimmermann;Jennifer L. Scott;Nina Heinrichs

  • Selective attention to imagined facial ugliness is specific to body dysmorphic disorder

    Anja Grocholewski;Soeren Kliem;Nina Heinrichs

  • Long-term outcome of a randomized controlled universal prevention trial through a positive parenting program: is it worth the effort?

    Kurt Hahlweg;Nina Heinrichs;Annett Kuschel;Heike Bertram

  • Four-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Triple P Group for Parent and Child Outcomes

    Nina Heinrichs;Soeren Kliem;Kurt Hahlweg

  • Die langfristige Wirksamkeit eines Elterntrainings zur universellen Prävention kindlicher Verhaltensstörungen

    Nina Heinrichs;Kurt Hahlweg;Heike Bertram;Annett Kuschel

  • Der Erziehungsfragebogen (EFB)

    Sebastian Naumann;Heike Bertram;Annett Kuschel;Nina Heinrichs

  • Perceived Impact of Socially Anxious Behaviors on Individuals' Lives in Western and East Asian Countries

    Ronald M. Rapee;Jinkwan Kim;Jianping Wang;Xinghua Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurt Hahlweg
Kurt Hahlweg Technische Universität Braunschweig
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier University of Freiburg
Kerstin Konrad
Kerstin Konrad RWTH Aachen University
Stefan G. Hofmann
Stefan G. Hofmann Philipp University of Marburg
Manfred Döpfner
Manfred Döpfner University of Cologne
Peter Herschbach
Peter Herschbach Technical University of Munich
Wolfgang Lutz
Wolfgang Lutz University of Trier
Johannes Michalak
Johannes Michalak Witten/Herdecke University
Thomas Fydrich
Thomas Fydrich Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Thomas Heidenreich
Thomas Heidenreich Esslingen University of Applied Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Nina Heinrichs

Recently Published Articles