World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
6226
World Ranking
8538
National Ranking
3633

Nigel W. Daw publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nigel W. Daw sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 103 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Nigel W. Daw D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nigel W. Daw sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nigel W. Daw was affiliated with Yale University in the United States during their academic career. Their contributions to scientific research spanned various years, although specific details about published papers, co-authors, and research topics are not available in the provided data.

The absence of listed recent papers, frequent co-authors, and publication venues indicates that publicly accessible bibliographic records or summaries of their research output are limited or have not been documented in the source data.

Similarly, there is no detailed information about the main fields or subfields of study pursued by Nigel W. Daw, nor any enumeration of main topics covered in their academic work. This limits the ability to present a detailed map of their specific research focus or thematic intersections.

The scientist was identified as deceased, which frames the profile in past tense to accurately reflect the current status.

There is no record of book publications or awards received, which suggests that either such accomplishments are not documented in the source data or were not part of their professional record as captured here.

Best Publications

  • Experience-driven plasticity of visual cortex limited by myelin and Nogo receptor.

    Aaron W. McGee;Yupeng Yang;Quentin S. Fischer;Nigel W. Daw

  • Critical periods and amblyopia.

    Nigel W. Daw

  • The location and function of NMDA receptors in cat and kitten visual cortex.

    Kevin Fox;Hiromichi Sato;Nigel Daw

  • The Role of NMDA Receptors in Information Processing

    N. W. Daw;P. S. G. Stein;K. Fox

  • Critical period for monocular deprivation in the cat visual cortex

    N. W. Daw;K. Fox;H. Sato;D. Czepita

  • Colour-coded ganglion cells in the goldfish retina: extension of their receptive fields by means of new stimuli

    Nigel W. Daw

  • Rod pathways in mammalian retinae

    Unknown

  • Do NMDA receptors have a critical function in visual cortical plasticity

    K. Fox;N.W. Daw

  • The effect of varying stimulus intensity on NMDA-receptor activity in cat visual cortex.

    K. Fox;H. Sato;N. Daw

  • Dark-rearing delays the loss of NMDA-receptor function in kitten visual cortex.

    Kevin Fox;Kevin Fox;Nigel Daw;Hiromichi Sato;Hiromichi Sato;Damian Czepita

  • Goldfish Retina: Organization for Simultaneous Color Contrast

    Unknown

  • Cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase mediates ocular dominance shifts in cat visual cortex.

    Christopher J. Beaver;Qinghua Ji;Quentin S. Fischer;Nigel W. Daw

  • Mechanisms of plasticity in the visual cortex. The Friedenwald Lecture.

    N W Daw

  • Neurophysiology of color vision.

    Unknown

  • Injection of MK-801 Affects Ocular Dominance Shifts More Than Visual Activity

    N. W. Daw;B. Gordon;B. Gordon;K. D. Fox;K. D. Fox;H. J. Flavin

  • Requirement for the RIIβ Isoform of PKA, But Not Calcium-Stimulated Adenylyl Cyclase, in Visual Cortical Plasticity

    Quentin S. Fischer;Christopher J. Beaver;Yupeng Yang;Yan Rao

  • Mechanisms of Plasticity in the Visual Cortex

    Nigel W. Daw

  • cAMP Levels Increased by Activation of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors Correlate with Visual Plasticity

    Silvia N. M. Reid;Nigel W. Daw;Douglas S. Gregory;Helen Flavin

  • Immunohistochemical study of two phosphoinositide-linked metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR1 alpha and mGluR5) in the cat visual cortex before, during, and after the peak of the critical period for eye-specific connections.

    S. N. M. Reid;C. Romano;T. Hughes;N. W. Daw

  • Contrast sensitivity, Westheimer function and Stiles-Crawford effect in a blue cone monochromat.

    Unknown

  • Long term potentiation varies with layer in rat visual cortex.

    X.F. Wang;N.W. Daw

  • LTP and LTD vary with layer in rodent visual cortex.

    Nigel Daw;Yan Rao;Xue-Feng Wang;Quentin Fischer

  • Reduced ocular dominance plasticity and long‐term potentiation in the developing visual cortex of protein kinase A RIIα mutant mice

    Yan Rao;Quentin S. Fischer;Yupeng Yang;G. Stanley McKnight

  • Cortisol reduces plasticity in the kitten visual cortex

    N. W. Daw;H. Sato;K. Fox;T. Carmichael

Frequent Co-Authors

G. Stanley McKnight
G. Stanley McKnight University of Washington
Colin J. Barnstable
Colin J. Barnstable Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Lynne Kiorpes
Lynne Kiorpes New York University
Isabelle M. Mansuy
Isabelle M. Mansuy University of Zurich
William C. Sessa
William C. Sessa Pfizer (United States)
Daniel R. Storm
Daniel R. Storm University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience often opens doors to various interdisciplinary careers. Many students look for accredited and affordable paths to pursue related fields such as counseling, psychology, or therapy. If you're considering a flexible approach, online degrees can be a cost-effective and convenient solution.

Those interested in school counseling can read more about the cheapest online school counseling programs (cacrep-accredited), which are recognized for meeting high professional standards at a lower cost. There are also a range of online counseling programs suited for students seeking diverse counseling specialties.

For careers supporting families and relationships, you may consider affordable online mft programs designed to prepare you for marriage and family therapy roles. Additionally, if your interests lean toward psychological assessment or clinical practice, an affordable online masters in clinical psychology can be an excellent next step.

Each pathway offers unique insights and professional opportunities, complementing a background in Neuroscience while expanding your career possibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Nigel W. Daw

Recently Published Articles