World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 42 4677 4325 797 738 126 8921

Neil Stewart publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Neil Stewart between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Neil Stewart published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2025. 30 of the 174 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2025. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 3 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 17 publications
2000 2025

174 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Neil Stewart: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 3
2002 2
2003 3
2004 1
2005 3
2006 4
2007 6
2008 8
2009 14
2010 2
2011 6
2012 1
2013 1
2014 3
2015 7
2016 7
2017 7
2018 8
2019 14
2020 9
2021 15
2022 9
2023 10
2024 13
2025 17
Total 174
Download as CSV

Neil Stewart publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Stewart sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 126 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 126
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Neil Stewart D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Stewart sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313 42
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Neil Stewart is affiliated with the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom and has an extensive research portfolio primarily situated within economics and related disciplines.

The main fields of study for Neil Stewart encompass Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, with a significant number of publications distributed across several subfields:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • General Decision Sciences
  • Finance
  • Accounting
  • Sociology and Political Science

The researcher's work covers a variety of focused topics, including:

  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Housing Market and Economics
  • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Taxation and Compliance Studies
  • Digital Platforms and Economics

Neil Stewart has contributed to multiple academic journals and venues, with the most frequent outlets as follows:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • AEA Randomized Controlled Trials
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Management Science
  • Nature Human Behaviour

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Neil Stewart are:

  • "The association between gambling and financial, social and health outcomes in big financial data," 2021, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Officer bias, over-patrolling and ethnic disparities in stop and search," 2021, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "A meta-analysis of loss aversion in risky contexts," 2024, Journal of Economic Psychology
  • "Clozapine, neutropenia and Covid-19: should clinicians be concerned? 3 months report," 2021, Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health
  • "The role of alcohol in the link between national football (soccer) tournaments and domestic abuse - Evidence from England," 2020, Social Science & Medicine

The scientist collaborates frequently with a number of co-authors, including:

  • John Gathergood
  • Edika Quispe-Torreblanca
  • Benedict Guttman-Kenney
  • David Leake
  • Timothy L. Mullett

Best Publications

  • Decision by sampling

    Neil Stewart;Nick Chater;Gordon D A Brown

  • A social-cognitive model of trait and state levels of gratitude.

    Alex M. Wood;John Maltby;Neil Stewart;P. Alex Linley

  • Associations between a one-shot delay discounting measure and age, income, education and real-world impulsive behavior

    Stian Reimers;Elizabeth Ann Maylor;Neil Stewart;Nick Chater

  • Absolute Identification by Relative Judgment.

    Neil Stewart;Gordon D. A. Brown;Nick Chater

  • The Average Laboratory Samples a Population of 7,300 Amazon Mechanical Turk Workers

    Neil Stewart;Christoph Ungemach;Adam J. L. Harris;Daniel M. Bartels

  • Conceptualizing gratitude and appreciation as a unitary personality trait

    Alex M. Wood;John Maltby;Neil Stewart;Stephen Joseph

  • Does the brain calculate value

    Ivo Vlaev;Nick Chater;Neil Stewart;Gordon D.A. Brown

  • Are Probabilities Overweighted or Underweighted When Rare Outcomes Are Experienced (Rarely)

    Christoph Ungemach;Nick Chater;Neil Stewart

  • Crowdsourcing Samples in Cognitive Science

    Neil Stewart;Jesse Chandler;Jesse Chandler;Gabriele Paolacci

  • The Cost of Anchoring on Credit-Card Minimum Repayments

    Neil Stewart

  • How to make loss aversion disappear and reverse : tests of the decision by sampling origin of loss aversion

    Lukasz Walasek;Neil Stewart

  • Decision by sampling: the role of the decision environment in risky choice.

    Neil Stewart

  • How Do Individuals Repay Their Debt? The Balance-Matching Heuristic

    John Gathergood;Neale Mahoney;Neil Stewart;Joerg Weber

  • Prospect relativity: how choice options influence decision under risk

    Neil Stewart;Nick Chater;Henry P. Stott;Stian Reimers

  • Eye Movements in Risky Choice.

    Neil Stewart;Frouke Hermens;William J. Matthews

  • Presentation and response timing accuracy in Adobe Flash and HTML5/JavaScript Web experiments

    Stian Reimers;Neil Stewart

  • In the attraction, compromise, and similarity effects, alternatives are repeatedly compared in pairs on single dimensions.

    Takao Noguchi;Neil Stewart

  • Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli

    Neil Stewart;Gordon D. A. Brown;Nick Chater

  • On the Origin of Utility, Weighting, and Discounting Functions: How They Get Their Shapes and How to Change Their Shapes

    Neil Stewart;Stian Reimers;Adam J. L. Harris

  • The association between gambling and financial, social and health outcomes in big financial data.

    Naomi Muggleton;Paula Parpart;Paula Parpart;Paula Parpart;Philip Newall;Philip Newall;David Leake

  • Stimulus intensity and the perception of duration.

    William J. Matthews;Neil Stewart;John H. Wearden

Frequent Co-Authors

Nick Chater
Nick Chater University of Warwick
Gordon D. A. Brown
Gordon D. A. Brown University of Warwick
George Loewenstein
George Loewenstein Carnegie Mellon University
David A. Hirshleifer
David A. Hirshleifer University of Southern California
Daniel Read
Daniel Read University of Warwick
Alex M. Wood
Alex M. Wood London School of Economics and Political Science
Ben R. Newell
Ben R. Newell University of New South Wales
Stephen Joseph
Stephen Joseph University of Nottingham
John Maltby
John Maltby University of Leicester
Mike Oaksford
Mike Oaksford Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Social Sciences and Humanities is now more accessible than ever, thanks to a variety of flexible online options. Students seeking to advance their credentials quickly can consider one year masters programs designed for fast-tracking academic and career progress.

For those looking to enter the workforce sooner, an accelerated online degree allows students to complete their studies in less time than traditional programs. This is ideal for career changers or those eager to build foundational knowledge without a lengthy commitment.

If you're interested in social work, several institutions now offer the most affordable online msw programs. These programs balance quality with cost, making advanced education in social work more attainable.

Additionally, professionals interested in behavior analysis can pursue bcba certification online, opening new doors in education, therapy, and behavioral sciences. Each pathway provides unique opportunities for growth and specialization within the broader field of Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Neil Stewart

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles