World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
60
Citations
9348
World Ranking
3917
National Ranking
340

Peter Dechent publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Dechent sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 212 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Peter Dechent D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Dechent sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Dechent is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their research spans several subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, and Physiology.

The researcher's work covers a range of main topics: Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Nutritional Studies and Diet, and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism.

Peter Dechent has published frequently in several venues, with a notable presence in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Neurology

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Annika Spottke
  • Jens Wiltfang
  • Klaus Fließbach
  • Oliver Peters
  • Josef Priller

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Peter Dechent include:

  • "Mediterranean Diet, Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers, and Brain Atrophy in Old Age," 2021, Neurology
  • "Novelty-Related fMRI Responses of Precuneus and Medial Temporal Regions in Individuals at Risk for Alzheimer Disease," 2022, Neurology
  • "Soluble TAM receptors sAXL and sTyro3 predict structural and functional protection in Alzheimer's disease," 2022, Neuron
  • "Improving 3D convolutional neural network comprehensibility via interactive visualization of relevance maps: evaluation in Alzheimer's disease," 2021, Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED)
  • "Cholinergic white matter pathways along the Alzheimer's disease continuum," 2022, Brain

Best Publications

  • High-resolution maps of magnetization transfer with inherent correction for RF inhomogeneity and T1 relaxation obtained from 3D FLASH MRI.

    Gunther Helms;Henning Dathe;Kai Kallenberg;Peter Dechent

  • The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial frame of reference.

    Tino Zaehle;Kirsten Jordan;Torsten Wüstenberg;Jürgen Baudewig

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI.

    Andrea Antal;Rafael Polania;Carsten Schmidt-Samoa;Peter Dechent

  • Folate Receptor Alpha Defect Causes Cerebral Folate Transport Deficiency: A Treatable Neurodegenerative Disorder Associated with Disturbed Myelin Metabolism

    Robert Steinfeld;Marcel Grapp;Ralph Kraetzner;Steffi Dreha-Kulaczewski

  • Increase of total creatine in human brain after oral supplementation of creatine-monohydrate.

    P. Dechent;P. J. W. Pouwels;B. Wilken;F. Hanefeld

  • Imaging the Brain Activity Changes Underlying Impaired Visuospatial Judgments: Simultaneous fMRI, TMS, and Behavioral Studies

    Alexander T. Sack;Axel Kohler;Sven Bestmann;David E. J. Linden

  • Functional somatotopy of finger representations in human primary motor cortex

    Peter Dechent;Jens Frahm

  • Reduced amygdalar and hippocampal size in adults with generalized social phobia.

    Eva Irle;Mirjana Ruhleder;Claudia Lange;Ulrich Seidler-Brandler

  • Individual voxel-based subtype prediction can differentiate progressive supranuclear palsy from idiopathic Parkinson syndrome and healthy controls.

    Niels K Focke;Gunther Helms;Sebstian Scheewe;Pia M Pantel

  • Differentiating unipolar and bipolar depression by alterations in large-scale brain networks.

    Roberto Goya-Maldonado;Katja Brodmann;Maria Keil;Sarah Trost

  • Mediterranean Diet, Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers and Brain Atrophy in Old Age.

    Tommaso Ballarini;Debora Melo van Lent;Debora Melo van Lent;Julia Brunner;Alina Schröder

  • Behavioral correlates of negative BOLD signal changes in the primary somatosensory cortex.

    Andreas Kastrup;Jürgen Baudewig;Sonja Schnaudigel;Ralph Huonker

  • Imaging artifacts induced by electrical stimulation during conventional fMRI of the brain

    Andrea Antal;Marom Bikson;Abhishek Datta;Belen Lafon

  • Neural correlates of tinnitus related distress: an fMRI-study.

    Dennis Golm;Carsten Schmidt-Samoa;Peter Dechent;Birgit Kröner-Herwig

  • Multi-site voxel-based morphometry--not quite there yet.

    Niels K Focke;Gunther Helms;Susanne Kaspar;Christine Diederich

  • Voluntary pelvic floor muscle control--an fMRI study.

    S. Seseke;Jürgen Baudewig;Kai Kallenberg;R.-H. Ringert

  • Increased SNR and reduced distortions by averaging multiple gradient echo signals in 3D FLASH imaging of the human brain at 3T.

    Gunther Helms;Peter Dechent

  • Current intensity- and polarity-specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study.

    Asif Jamil;Giorgi Batsikadze;Hsiao‐I. Kuo;Raf L. J. Meesen

  • Proton MRS profile of cerebral metabolic abnormalities in Krabbe disease.

    K. Brockmann;P. Dechent;B. Wilken;O. Rusch

  • Predicting Response to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Schizophrenia Using Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Multisite Machine Learning Analysis.

    Nikolaos Koutsouleris;Thomas Wobrock;Birgit Guse;Berthold Langguth

  • Succinate in dystrophic white matter: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy finding characteristic for complex II deficiency.

    Knut Brockmann;Alf Bjornstad;Peter Dechent;Christoph G. Korenke

  • Is the human primary motor cortex involved in motor imagery? (vol 19, pg 138, 2004)

    P. Dechent;K. D. Merboldt;J. Frahm

Frequent Co-Authors

Jürgen Baudewig
Jürgen Baudewig German Primate Center
Oliver Gruber
Oliver Gruber Heidelberg University
Peter Falkai
Peter Falkai Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Birgit Ertl-Wagner
Birgit Ertl-Wagner University of Toronto
Walter Paulus
Walter Paulus University of Göttingen
Andrea Schmitt
Andrea Schmitt Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Christoph Laske
Christoph Laske University of Tübingen
Michael T. Heneka
Michael T. Heneka University Hospital Bonn
Frank Jessen
Frank Jessen University of Cologne
Veit Roessner
Veit Roessner TU Dresden

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter Dechent

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles