World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Murray J. Thomson

Murray J. Thomson

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
53
Citations
9365
World Ranking
1014
National Ranking
46

Murray J. Thomson publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Murray J. Thomson sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 156 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Murray J. Thomson D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Murray J. Thomson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the Combustion Institute for exceptional fundamental research leading to a better understanding of soot formation in flames
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering

Overview

Murray J. Thomson is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of engineering with a focus on combustion and energy-related topics. Their body of work spans various aspects of combustion science, thermochemical processes, and fluid dynamics.

The research areas covered by Thomson include:

  • Combustion and flame dynamics
  • Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
  • Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
  • Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
  • Heat transfer and supercritical fluids

Within the broad field of engineering, Thomson's subfields of study involve:

  • Computational Mechanics
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Thomson's recent scholarly publications include:

  • "Spray combustion of fast pyrolysis bio-oils: Applications, challenges, and potential solutions," 2020, published in Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
  • "Revealing the Thermal Safety of Prussian Blue Cathode for Safer Nonaqueous Batteries," 2021, published in Advanced Energy Materials
  • "CO2-free hydrogen production via microwave-driven methane pyrolysis," 2023, published in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • "Modeling soot formation in flames and reactors: Recent progress and current challenges," 2022, published in Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
  • "Experimental and numerical investigation of soot growth and inception in an ammonia-ethylene flame," 2022, published in Proceedings of the Combustion Institute

Frequently publishing in notable venues, Thomson's work appears often in:

  • Combustion and Flame
  • Default Digital Object Group
  • International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Their recurring collaborators include:

  • Mohsen Broumand
  • Mehran Dadsetan
  • Carson Chu
  • Sean Yun
  • Zekai Hong

Murray J. Thomson has been recognized by being named a Fellow of the Combustion Institute in 2018 for research advancing the understanding of soot formation in flames. The scientist is also associated with the Canadian Academy of Engineering.

Best Publications

  • A review of the combustion and emissions properties of advanced transportation biofuels and their impact on existing and future engines

    Jeffrey M. Bergthorson;Murray J. Thomson

  • An experimental and kinetic modeling study of n-butanol combustion

    S.M. Sarathy;M.J. Thomson;C. Togbé;P. Dagaut

  • A wide-ranging kinetic modeling study of methyl butanoate combustion

    S. Gaïl;M.J. Thomson;S.M. Sarathy;S.A. Syed

  • Application of an enhanced PAH growth model to soot formation in a laminar coflow ethylene/air diffusion flame

    Seth B. Dworkin;Qingan Zhang;Murray J. Thomson;Nadezhda A. Slavinskaya

  • A chemical kinetic study of n-butanol oxidation at elevated pressure in a jet stirred reactor

    P. Dagaut;S.M. Sarathy;M.J. Thomson

  • Detailed numerical modeling of PAH formation and growth in non-premixed ethylene and ethane flames

    Nadezhda A. Slavinskaya;Uwe Riedel;Seth B. Dworkin;Murray J. Thomson

  • Chemical Kinetic Modeling of Dimethyl Carbonate in an Opposed-Flow Diffusion Flame

    Pierre-Alexandre Glaude;William J. Pitz;Murray J. Thomson

  • CoFlame: A refined and validated numerical algorithm for modeling sooting laminar coflow diffusion flames

    Nick A. Eaves;Qingan Zhang;Fengshan Liu;Hongsheng Guo

  • The evolution of soot morphology in a laminar coflow diffusion flame of a surrogate for Jet A-1

    Mohammadreza Kholghy;Meghdad Saffaripour;Christopher Yip;Murray John Thomson

  • Soot formation with C1 and C2 fuels using an improved chemical mechanism for PAH growth

    Victor Chernov;Murray J. Thomson;Seth B. Dworkin;Nadezhda A. Slavinskaya

  • Modeling soot formation in turbulent kerosene/air jet diffusion flames

    Z. Wen;S. Yun;M.J. Thomson;M.F. Lightstone

  • The core–shell internal nanostructure of soot – A criterion to model soot maturity

    Mohammad Reza Kholghy;Armin Veshkini;Murray John Thomson

  • Experimental and chemical kinetic modeling study of small methyl esters oxidation: Methyl (E)-2-butenoate and methyl butanoate

    S. Gaïl;S.M. Sarathy;M.J. Thomson;P. Diévart

  • A comparison of saturated and unsaturated C4 fatty acid methyl esters in an opposed flow diffusion flame and a jet stirred reactor

    S.M. Sarathy;S. Gaïl;S.A. Syed;M.J. Thomson

  • Modeling of soot aggregate formation and size distribution in a laminar ethylene/air coflow diffusion flame with detailed PAH chemistry and an advanced sectional aerosol dynamics model

    Q. Zhang;H. Guo;F. Liu;G.J. Smallwood

  • Experimental investigation and detailed modeling of soot aggregate formation and size distribution in laminar coflow diffusion flames of Jet A-1, a synthetic kerosene, and n-decane

    Meghdad Saffaripour;Armin Veshkini;Mohammadreza Kholghy;Murray J. Thomson

  • The importance of reversibility in modeling soot nucleation and condensation processes

    N.A. Eaves;S.B. Dworkin;M.J. Thomson

  • Comparison of multiple diagnostic techniques to study soot formation and morphology in a diffusion flame

    Mohammad Reza Kholghy;Yashar Afarin;Anton D Sediako;Javier Barba

  • Experimental and numerical study of soot formation in laminar coflow diffusion flames of gasoline/ethanol blends

    Ali Khosousi;Fengshan Liu;Seth B. Dworkin;Nick A. Eaves

  • The chemical structures of opposed flow diffusion flames of C3 oxygenated hydrocarbons (isopropanol, dimethoxy methane, and dimethyl carbonate) and their mixtures

    A Sinha;M.J Thomson

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory J. Smallwood
Gregory J. Smallwood National Research Council Canada
Hongsheng Guo
Hongsheng Guo National Research Council Canada
Philippe Dagaut
Philippe Dagaut Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Marco Mehl
Marco Mehl Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Vilas G. Pol
Vilas G. Pol Purdue University West Lafayette
William J. Pitz
William J. Pitz Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Magín Lapuerta
Magín Lapuerta University of Castilla-La Mancha
Shijin Shuai
Shijin Shuai Tsinghua University
Jane Y. Howe
Jane Y. Howe University of Toronto
Ayusman Sen
Ayusman Sen Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring mechanical and aerospace engineering opens doors to various specialized fields and career pathways. For students seeking flexible learning, programs like an online speech pathology degree for military veterans demonstrate how online education can cater to specific community needs, blending accessibility with robust training.

Accelerated programs are also gaining popularity, as seen with options such as accelerated SLP programs, allowing students to fast-track their qualifications without compromising quality. This flexibility is particularly advantageous for those balancing work or other responsibilities.

Career outlooks in fields related to engineering and applied sciences often reflect competitive salaries and unique roles. For example, understanding the pathway to become an FBI criminal profiler salary offers insight into niche careers requiring analytical skills and specialized education.

Additionally, related disciplines such as counseling provide valuable intersections for engineers interested in human factors or workplace wellness. Reviewing the different types of therapist degrees can help clarify options for those considering diverse career expansions beyond traditional engineering roles.

Best Scientists Citing Murray J. Thomson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles