World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
36
Citations
6628
World Ranking
1576
National Ranking
52

Mirte Bosse publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mirte Bosse sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 114 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Mirte Bosse D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mirte Bosse sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution

    Martien A. M. Groenen;Alan L. Archibald;Hirohide Uenishi;Christopher K. Tuggle

  • Genetic load: genomic estimates and applications in non-model animals

    Unknown

  • Linking rhizosphere microbiome composition of wild and domesticated Phaseolus vulgaris to genotypic and root phenotypic traits.

    Juan E. Pérez-Jaramillo;Víctor J. Carrión;Mirte Bosse;Luiz F.V. Ferrão

  • Evidence of long-term gene flow and selection during domestication from analyses of Eurasian wild and domestic pig genomes.

    Laurent A F Frantz;Laurent A F Frantz;Joshua G Schraiber;Ole Madsen;Hendrik-Jan Megens

  • Regions of homozygosity in the porcine genome: consequence of demography and the recombination landscape.

    Mirte Bosse;Hendrik Jan Megens;Ole Madsen;Yogesh Paudel

  • Runs of homozygosity and distribution of functional variants in the cattle genome

    Qianqian Zhang;Qianqian Zhang;Bernt Guldbrandtsen;Mirte Bosse;Mogens S Lund

  • Genomic analysis reveals selection for Asian genes in European pigs following human-mediated introgression

    Mirte Bosse;Hendrik-Jan Megens;Laurent A. F. Frantz;Ole Madsen

  • Recent natural selection causes adaptive evolution of an avian polygenic trait

    Mirte Bosse;Lewis G. Spurgin;Lewis G. Spurgin;Veronika N. Laine;Ella F. Cole

  • Genome sequencing reveals fine scale diversification and reticulation history during speciation in Sus

    Laurent A.F. Frantz;Joshua G. Schraiber;Ole Madsen;Hendrik Jan Megens

  • Deleterious alleles in the context of domestication, inbreeding, and selection

    Mirte Bosse;Hendrik‐Jan Megens;Martijn F. L. Derks;Ángeles M. R. de Cara

  • Evolutionary dynamics of copy number variation in pig genomes in the context of adaptation and domestication

    Yogesh Paudel;Ole Madsen;Hendrik-Jan Megens;Laurent A F Frantz

  • Genome-Wide Characterization of Selection Signatures and Runs of Homozygosity in Ugandan Goat Breeds

    Robert B Onzima;Robert B Onzima;Maulik R Upadhyay;Maulik R Upadhyay;Harmen P Doekes;Luiz F Brito

  • Conservation genomic analysis of domestic and wild pig populations from the Iberian Peninsula

    Juan Manuel Herrero-Medrano;Hendrik-Jan Megens;Martien A M Groenen;Guillermo Ramis

  • Copy number variation in the speciation of pigs: a possible prominent role for olfactory receptors

    Yogesh Paudel;Yogesh Paudel;Ole Madsen;Hendrik-Jan Megens;Laurent A F Frantz

  • Using genome-wide measures of coancestry to maintain diversity and fitness in endangered and domestic pig populations

    Mirte Bosse;Hendrik-Jan Megens;Ole Madsen;Richard P.M.A. Crooijmans

  • pCADD: SNV prioritisation in Sus scrofa

    Christian Groß;Martijn Derks;Hendrik Jan Megens;Mirte Bosse

  • Untangling the hybrid nature of modern pig genomes: a mosaic derived from biogeographically distinct and highly divergent Sus scrofa populations

    Mirte Bosse;Hendrik-Jan Megens;Ole Madsen;Laurent A. F. Frantz

  • A 12 kb multi-allelic copy number variation encompassing a GC gene enhancer is associated with mastitis resistance in dairy cattle.

    Young-Lim Lee;Haruko Takeda;Gabriel Costa Monteiro Moreira;Latifa Karim

  • The type of bottleneck matters: Insights into the deleterious variation landscape of small managed populations

    Chiara Bortoluzzi;Mirte Bosse;Martijn F.L. Derks;Richard P.M.A. Crooijmans

  • Whole-genome sequence analysis reveals differences in population management and selection of European low-input pig breeds

    Juan Manuel Herrero-Medrano;Hendrik-Jan Megens;Martien A M Groenen;Mirte Bosse

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Animal Science and Veterinary opens the door to various interdisciplinary career pathways. For instance, students interested in the overall health and physical well-being of animals may find it beneficial to study exercise science online. This growing field offers insight into biomechanics and physical health, which can complement veterinary knowledge.

For those focused on behavioral health, exploring certification programs such as the best schools for bcba can provide specialized training in behavior analysis. This is particularly relevant for professionals working with animals exhibiting behavioral issues or in therapeutic settings.

Psychology also plays a crucial role in animal science, especially in understanding animal behavior and welfare. Accredited programs like school psychology programs online accredited by nasp offer a model of quality education that students can consider when seeking related online studies. Such structured programs ensure strong academic standards and practical experience.

Lastly, pursuing advanced degrees from reputable sources, such as apa accredited online programs, can be advantageous. These programs often offer flexibility with fewer barriers like GRE requirements, supporting students who wish to deepen their expertise in psychology-related fields that intersect with animal sciences.

Recently Published Articles