World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Melvin J. Glimcher

Melvin J. Glimcher

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
85
Citations
24306
World Ranking
3172
National Ranking
1599

Melvin J. Glimcher publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melvin J. Glimcher sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 279 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Melvin J. Glimcher D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melvin J. Glimcher sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Melvin J. Glimcher was affiliated with Harvard University in the United States during their career. Their academic work and contributions were rooted in this institution.

The scientist's record does not list any recent papers, co-authors, frequent publication venues, book publications, main fields of study, subfields, main topics, or awards.

Due to their status as deceased, all aspects of their academic profile are discussed in the past tense.

Best Publications

  • Eta-1 (Osteopontin): An Early Component of Type-1 (Cell-Mediated) Immunity

    Samy Ashkar;Georg F. Weber;Vassiliki Panoutsakopoulou;Marie E. Sanchirico

  • Receptor-Ligand Interaction Between CD44 and Osteopontin (Eta-1)

    Georg F. Weber;Samy Ashkar;Melvin J. Glimcher;Harvey Cantor

  • Biochemical studies on repair cartilage resurfacing experimental defects in the rabbit knee.

    T Furukawa;D R Eyre;S Koide;M J Glimcher

  • Resolution-enhanced Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy study of the environment of phosphate ion in the early deposits of a solid phase of calcium phosphate in bone and enamel and their evolution with age: 2. Investigations in the nu3PO4 domain.

    Christian Rey;M. Shimizu;B. Collins;Melvin J. Glimcher

  • A heritable disorder of connective tissue. Hydroxylysine-deficient collagen disease.

    Sheldon R. Pinnell;Stephen M. Krane;John E. Kenzora;Melvin J. Glimcher

  • Chondrodysplasia and neurological abnormalities in ATF-2-deficient mice

    Andreas M. Reimold;Michael J. Grusby;Bela Kosaras;Jochen W. U. Fries

  • Recent Studies of the Mineral Phase in Bone and Its Possible Linkage to the Organic Matrix by Protein-Bound Phosphate Bonds

    Glimcher Mj

  • Regulation of Adult Bone Mass by the Zinc Finger Adapter Protein Schnurri-3

    Dallas C. Jones;Marc N. Wein;Mohamed Oukka;Mohamed Oukka;Jochen G. Hofstaetter

  • Shape and size of isolated bone mineralites measured using atomic force microscopy

    Steven J. Eppell;Weidong Tong;J. Lawrence Katz;Liisa Kuhn

  • The nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) transcription factor NFATp (NFATc2) is a repressor of chondrogenesis.

    Ann M. Ranger;Louis C. Gerstenfeld;Jinxi Wang;Tamiyo Kon;Tamiyo Kon

  • THE STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION OF, AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ORGANIC MATRIX AND THE INORGANIC CRYSTALS OF EMBRYONIC BOVINE ENAMEL.

    Dorothy F. Travis;Melvin J. Glimcher

  • Electron microscopic observations of bone tissue prepared anhydrously in organic solvents

    William J. Landis;Mary C. Paine;Melvin J. Glimcher

  • Electron diffraction and electron probe microanalysis of the mineral phase of bone tissue prepared by anhydrous techniques.

    William J. Landis;Melvin J. Glimcher

  • X-ray diffraction studies of the crystallinity of bone mineral in newly synthesized and density fractionated bone

    L. C. Bonar;A. H. Roufosse;W. K. Sabine;M. D. Grynpas

  • Hydroxyapatite crystals as a local delivery system for cisplatin: adsorption and release of cisplatin in vitro.

    Allal Barroug;Melvin J Glimcher

  • Solid-state phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance studies of synthetic solid phases of calcium phosphate: potential models of bone mineral.

    W. P. Aue;A. H. Roufosse;M. J. Glimcher;R. G. Griffin

  • High-resolution immunolocalization of osteopontin and osteocalcin in bone and cartilage during endochondral ossification in the chicken tibia.

    M. D. McKee;M. J. Glimcher;A. Nanci

  • The biology of osteonecrosis of the human femoral head and its clinical implications. III. Discussion of the etiology and genesis of the pathological sequelae; commments on treatment.

    Melvin J. Glimcher;John E. Kenzora

  • Recent studies of bone mineral: Is the amorphous calcium phosphate theory valid?

    Melvin J. Glimcher;Laurence C. Bonar;Marc D. Grynpas;William J. Landis

  • The biology of osteonecrosis of the human femoral head and its clinical implications: II. The pathological changes in the femoral head as an organ and in the hip joint.

    Melvin J. Glimcher;John E. Kenzora

Frequent Co-Authors

David R. Eyre
David R. Eyre University of Washington
Stephen M. Krane
Stephen M. Krane Harvard University
Louis C. Gerstenfeld
Louis C. Gerstenfeld Boston University
Marc D. Grynpas
Marc D. Grynpas University of Toronto
Christian Rey
Christian Rey Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Christian Burger
Christian Burger Max Planck Society
Benjamin Chu
Benjamin Chu Stony Brook University
Benjamin S. Hsiao
Benjamin S. Hsiao Stony Brook University
Laurie H. Glimcher
Laurie H. Glimcher Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to diverse careers, especially in healthcare data and technology. Roles like medical coding, billing, and health information management are in high demand and offer remote or flexible job opportunities.

Understanding the ccs vs cpc salary differences can help you choose the best certification for your career goals. While both are respected credentials in medical coding, salary and job options may vary based on certification type and experience.

If you’re interested in this field, it’s worth learning more about medical.coder salary and the typical pathway to becoming certified. Medical coders enjoy competitive pay, with demand rising due to the digitalization of healthcare records.

The job outlook for medical billing and coding remains strong, offering job security in hospitals, clinics, and even remote positions. For those seeking flexible education options, choosing from the health information management online degree programs can be an affordable and convenient way to enter this growing sector.

Best Scientists Citing Melvin J. Glimcher

Recently Published Articles