World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 61 3007 1194 247 13074

Max Paape publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Max Paape between 1962 and 2012, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Max Paape published across 51 years, from 1962 to 2012, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2004. 1 of the 264 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2012. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2004. 1962: 1 publication 1963: 2 publications 1964: 1 publication 1965: 2 publications 1966: 2 publications 1967: 3 publications 1968: 2 publications 1969: 5 publications 1970: 4 publications 1971: 5 publications 1972: 4 publications 1973: 9 publications 1974: 5 publications 1975: 8 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 7 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 7 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication
1962 2012

264 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Max Paape: publications per year, 1962 to 2012
Year Publications
1962 1
1963 2
1964 1
1965 2
1966 2
1967 3
1968 2
1969 5
1970 4
1971 5
1972 4
1973 9
1974 5
1975 8
1976 1
1977 7
1978 3
1979 4
1980 7
1981 4
1982 4
1983 3
1984 2
1985 4
1986 4
1987 5
1988 7
1989 0
1990 3
1991 7
1992 8
1993 6
1994 6
1995 3
1996 6
1997 10
1998 8
1999 10
2000 7
2001 6
2002 10
2003 10
2004 11
2005 11
2006 8
2007 11
2008 8
2009 2
2010 4
2011 0
2012 1
Total 264
Download as CSV

Max Paape publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max Paape sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 245–254 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 247 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160 247
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Max Paape D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max Paape sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123 61
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Max Paape is affiliated with the Agricultural Research Service in the United States. Their professional focus is connected to agricultural science and research as part of this federal agency, which is dedicated to advancing agricultural knowledge and technology.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues listed for Max Paape. Similarly, no specific fields of study, subfields, or main research topics have been provided.

No book publications or awards have been recorded in the available data. There is also no indication of whether this scientist has received distinctions or formal recognition within their field.

While detailed specifics of their research outputs and collaborations are not available, Max Paape's association with the Agricultural Research Service implies involvement in scientific activities related to agriculture, which could encompass areas such as crop science, soil management, pest control, or other agricultural technologies.

Best Publications

  • The bovine neutrophil: Structure and function in blood and milk.

    Max J Paape;Douglas D Bannerman;Xin Zhao;Jai-Wei Lee

  • Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus Elicit Differential Innate Immune Responses following Intramammary Infection

    Douglas D. Bannerman;Max J. Paape;Jai-Wei Lee;Xin Zhao

  • Mammary cell number, proliferation, and apoptosis during a bovine lactation: relation to milk production and effect of bST.

    Anthony Capuco;DL Wood;R Baldwin;K Mcleod

  • Mastitis in small ruminants.

    A. Contreras;D. Sierra;A. Sánchez;J.C. Corrales

  • Genetically enhanced cows resist intramammary Staphylococcus aureus infection.

    Robert J Wall;Anne M Powell;Max J Paape;David E Kerr

  • Defense of the Bovine Mammary Gland by Polymorphonuclear Neutrophil Leukocytes

    Max Paape;Jalil Mehrzad;Xin Zhao;Johann Detilleux

  • Lactation persistency: Insights from mammary cell proliferation studies

    Anthony V. Capuco;Se E. Ellis;Sa A. Hale;E. Long

  • Leukocytes-second line of defense against invading mastitis pathogens

    M.J. Paape;W.P. Wergin;A.J. Guidry;R.E. Pearson

  • Monitoring goat and sheep milk somatic cell counts

    Max Paape;GR Wiggans;Douglas D Bannerman;DL Thomas

  • Complement fragment C5a and inflammatory cytokines in neutrophil recruitment during intramammary infection with Escherichia coli.

    D E Shuster;M E Kehrli;P Rainard;M Paape

  • Milk Somatic Cells and Lactation in Small Ruminants

    M.J. Paape;Bernard Poutrel;Antonio Contreras;Juan C. Marco

  • Role of the neutrophil leucocyte in the local and systemic reactions during experimentally induced E. coli mastitis in cows immediately after calving.

    Christian Burvenich;Max Paape;AW Hill;AJ Guidry

  • Cumulative physiological events influence the inflammatory response of the bovine udder to Escherichia coli infections during the transition period.

    Christian Burvenich;Douglas D Bannerman;JD Lippolis;Luc Peelman

  • Increased levels of LPS-binding protein in bovine blood and milk following bacterial lipopolysaccharide challenge.

    Unknown

  • Effects of parturition and lactation on blood and milk cell concentrations, corticosteroids, and neutrophil phagocytosis in the cow.

    Guidry Aj;Paape Mj;Pearson Re

  • Characterization of cytokine expression in milk somatic cells during intramammary infections with Escherichia coli or Staphylococcus aureus by real-time PCR.

    Jai-Wei Lee;Douglas D. Bannerman;Max J. Paape;Ming-Kuei Huang

  • Immune Surveillance of Mammary Tissue by Phagocytic Cells

    Max J. Paape;Kimberly Shafer-Weaver;Anthony V. Capuco;Kaat Van Oostveldt

  • Effect of Parity, Stage of Lactation, and Intramammary Infection on Concentration of Somatic Cells and Cytoplasmic Particles in Goat Milk

    A.M. Dulin;M.J. Paape;W.D. Schultze;B.T. Weinland

  • Hormonal patterns during heat stress following PGF2α-tham salt induced luteal regression in heifers

    F.C. Gwazdauskas;W.W. Thatcher;C.A. Kiddy;M.J. Paape

  • Bacterial lipopolysaccharide induces increased expression of toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 and downstream TLR signaling molecules in bovine mammary epithelial cells.

    Eveline M Ibeagha-Awemu;Jai-Wei Lee;Aloysius E Ibeagha;Douglas D Bannerman

  • Role of the neutrophil leukocyte in the local and systemic reactions during experimentally induced E. coli mastitis in cows immediately after calving

    Christian Burvenich;Max Paape;AW Hill;AJ Guidry

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Burvenich
Christian Burvenich Ghent University
Xin Zhao
Xin Zhao McGill University
Pascal Rainard
Pascal Rainard INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Dante S. Zarlenga
Dante S. Zarlenga Agricultural Research Service
Jesse P. Goff
Jesse P. Goff Iowa State University
Paolo Moroni
Paolo Moroni University of Milan
Ali M. Sadeghi
Ali M. Sadeghi Agricultural Research Service
Luc Duchateau
Luc Duchateau Ghent University
Laura L. McConnell
Laura L. McConnell Bayer (United States)
Jayne Hope
Jayne Hope University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Microbiology opens doors to various related fields, many of which can be explored through flexible online programs. For those interested in healthcare administration, programs like the fastest online medical billing and coding certificate programs offer a quick pathway to enter the medical billing sector, supporting clinical operations behind the scenes.

Additionally, if you're aiming for a clinical or research career with a medical emphasis, it's useful to know what medical degrees can I get online. This insight can help you find accredited degrees suited to your goals without sacrificing flexibility.

For those looking to expand into public health, exploring easy admission online MPH programs can provide accessible opportunities. These programs often bridge microbiology and public health, preparing graduates for impactful roles in disease prevention and health education.

Moreover, careers like child life specialists, which support children’s wellbeing in clinical settings, can complement a background in microbiology. Understanding how much does a child life specialist make helps evaluate this pathway's potential both professionally and financially.

Best Scientists Citing Max Paape

Recently Published Articles