What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- IUCN Red List
- Habitat
His primary scientific interests are in Ecology, Zoology, Predation, Nasua and Carnivore.
His study brings together the fields of Parasite hosting and Ecology.
He combines subjects such as Biological dispersal, Home range and Sex ratio with his study of Zoology.
His studies deal with areas such as Animal ecology, Frugivore and Competition as well as Predation.
In the field of Nasua, his study on Coati overlaps with subjects such as Bassaricyon, Sister group, Molecular phylogenetics and Bassariscus.
Matthew E. Gompper has included themes like Free-ranging dog and Intraguild predation in his Carnivore study.
His most cited work include:
- A comparison of noninvasive techniques to survey carnivore communities in northeastern North America (244 citations)
- The Ecological Role of the Mammalian Mesocarnivore (185 citations)
- Dogs Canis familiaris as carnivores: their role and function in intraguild competition (178 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of investigation include Ecology, Zoology, Carnivore, Predation and Nasua.
His research in Habitat, Eastern spotted skunk, Range, Abundance and Wildlife are components of Ecology.
His Zoology research includes elements of Host, Population genetics and Parasite hosting.
His work carried out in the field of Carnivore brings together such families of science as Vulpes, Guild and Canis.
His Nasua research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Leopardus, Home range, Cerdocyon thous and Kinkajou.
Within one scientific family, Matthew E. Gompper focuses on topics pertaining to Critically endangered under Coati, and may sometimes address concerns connected to IUCN Red List.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (53.47%)
- Zoology (30.56%)
- Carnivore (20.14%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Zoology (30.56%)
- Wildlife (13.19%)
- Carnivore (20.14%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Zoology, Wildlife, Carnivore, Ecology and Nasua are his primary areas of study.
His work deals with themes such as Host, Population genetics and Genetic diversity, which intersect with Zoology.
His work on Wildlife disease as part of general Wildlife research is often related to Chronic wasting disease, thus linking different fields of science.
The Carnivore study combines topics in areas such as mtDNA control region, National park, Leopard and Animal ecology.
His research integrates issues of Count data and Environmental resource management in his study of Ecology.
His Nasua research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Eira barbara, Apex predator, Canis, Leopardus and Mesocarnivore.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- An agent-based framework for improving wildlife disease surveillance: A case study of chronic wasting disease in Missouri white-tailed deer. (9 citations)
- Phylogeographic and diversification patterns of the white-nosed coati (Nasua narica): Evidence for south-to-north colonization of North America. (5 citations)
- Tiger and leopard co-occurrence: intraguild interactions in response to human and livestock disturbance (4 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- IUCN Red List
- Habitat
His primary areas of study are Ecology, Carnivore, Range, Zoology and Leopard.
His work in Roadkill, Habitat, Mustelidae, Species distribution and Trophic level is related to Ecology.
His Carnivore study is concerned with Predation in general.
The various areas that he examines in his Range study include Population genetics, Genetic structure, Genetic diversity, Eastern spotted skunk and Landscape ecology.
His work on Nasua and Animal ecology as part of general Zoology research is frequently linked to Phylogeography, bridging the gap between disciplines.
Matthew E. Gompper interconnects mtDNA control region, Civet and Jackal in the investigation of issues within Leopard.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
