World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matteo Golfarelli

Matteo Golfarelli

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
6962
World Ranking
9295
National Ranking
264

Matteo Golfarelli publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matteo Golfarelli sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 200 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Matteo Golfarelli D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matteo Golfarelli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matteo Golfarelli is affiliated with the University of Bologna in Italy. Their primary field of study is Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing, Information Systems, and Plant Science.

The major topics covered in their research include:

  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Data Management and Algorithms
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Data Stream Mining Techniques
  • Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence

Recent publications by Matteo Golfarelli and close collaborators demonstrate a diversity of interests spanning computer science and agricultural applications. Selected papers include:

  • "Crop Management with the IoT: An Interdisciplinary Survey," 2021, Agronomy
  • "Exploiting the Internet Resources for Autonomous Robots in Agriculture," 2023, Agriculture
  • "Multi-sensor profiling for precision soil-moisture monitoring," 2022, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
  • "Making data platforms smarter with MOSES," 2021, Future Generation Computer Systems
  • "A dataspace-based framework for OLAP analyses in a high-variety multistore," 2021, The VLDB Journal

Their frequent collaborators include Matteo Francia, with whom they have collaborated on 26 occasions, followed by Enrico Gallinucci (17 collaborations), Stefano Rizzi (10 collaborations), Chiara Forresi (7 collaborations), and Giuliano Vitali (3 collaborations).

Matteo Golfarelli's work has been published primarily in the following venues:

  • Information Systems (5 publications)
  • Data & Knowledge Engineering (3 publications)
  • Future Generation Computer Systems (2 publications)
  • Ecological Informatics (2 publications)
  • Agronomy (1 publication)

The scope of Golfarelli's research intersects data management and algorithms with domain-specific innovations in smart agriculture and monitoring systems. Contributions to data stream mining and advanced database systems are evident, alongside interdisciplinary work involving plant science and precision agriculture technologies.

Best Publications

  • THE DIMENSIONAL FACT MODEL: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR DATA WAREHOUSES

    Matteo Golfarelli;Dario Maio;Stefano Rizzi

  • Beyond data warehousing: what's next in business intelligence?

    Matteo Golfarelli;Stefano Rizzi;Iuris Cella

  • Data Warehouse Design: Modern Principles and Methodologies

    Matteo Golfarelli;Stefano Rizzi

  • Conceptual design of data warehouses from E/R schemes

    M. Golfarelli;D. Maio;S. Rizzi

  • A methodological framework for data warehouse design

    Matteo Golfarelli;Stefano Rizzi

  • On the error-reject trade-off in biometric verification systems

    M. Golfarelli;D. Maio;D. Malton

  • Data warehouse design from XML sources

    Matteo Golfarelli;Stefano Rizzi;Boris Vrdoljak

  • Designing the Data Warehouse: Key Steps and Crucial Issues

    Matteo Golfarelli;Stefano Rizzi

  • Fusion Cubes: Towards Self-Service Business Intelligence

    Alberto Abelló;Jérôme Darmont;Lorena Etcheverry;Matteo Golfarelli

  • A Survey on Temporal Data Warehousing

    Matteo Golfarelli;Stefano Rizzi

  • Schema versioning in data warehouses: enabling cross-version querying via schema augmentation

    Matteo Golfarelli;Jens Lechtenbörger;Stefano Rizzi;Gottfried Vossen

  • Designing what-if analysis: towards a methodology

    Matteo Golfarelli;Stefano Rizzi;Andrea Proli

  • Similarity measures for OLAP sessions

    Julien Aligon;Matteo Golfarelli;Patrick Marcel;Stefano Rizzi

  • A collaborative filtering approach for recommending OLAP sessions

    Julien Aligon;Enrico Gallinucci;Matteo Golfarelli;Patrick Marcel

  • Elastic correction of dead-reckoning errors in map building

    M. Golfarelli;D. Maio;S. Rizzi

  • myOLAP: An Approach to Express and Evaluate OLAP Preferences

    M. Golfarelli;S. Rizzi;P. Biondi

  • From User Requirements to Conceptual Design in Warehouse Design: A Survey

    Matteo Golfarelli

  • A Task-Swap Negotiation Protocol Based on the Contract Net Paradigm

    Matteo Golfarelli;Dario Maio;Stefano Rizzi

  • Schema profiling of document-oriented databases

    Enrico Gallinucci;Matteo Golfarelli;Stefano Rizzi

  • Schema Versioning in Data Warehouses

    Matteo Golfarelli;Jens Lechtenbörger;Stefano Rizzi;Gottfried Vossen

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefano Rizzi
Stefano Rizzi University of Bologna
Dario Maio
Dario Maio University of Bologna
Alessandra Lumini
Alessandra Lumini University of Bologna
Panos Vassiliadis
Panos Vassiliadis University of Ioannina
Gottfried Vossen
Gottfried Vossen University of Münster
Vittorio Maniezzo
Vittorio Maniezzo University of Bologna
Juan Trujillo
Juan Trujillo University of Alicante
Elisa Bertino
Elisa Bertino Purdue University West Lafayette
Michalis Vazirgiannis
Michalis Vazirgiannis École Polytechnique
Themis Palpanas
Themis Palpanas Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to multiple interdisciplinary career pathways. Many students pair their studies with related technical fields to enhance their skill sets and career prospects. Online degrees have made this more accessible than ever.

Areas such as engineering and physics are popular complements to computer science. For instance, an environmental engineering online degree allows you to combine computational skills with sustainable problem-solving. Those interested in mechanics and robotics often pursue online mechanical engineering degrees.

Alternatively, you could follow a more theoretical path by enrolling in an online physics bachelor’s degree, which builds a strong analytical foundation for careers in research, technology, or academia. For tech-savvy professionals seeking business and analytics roles, the cheapest master in data science programs can help you specialize in big data, machine learning, and AI applications.

Choosing a related online degree not only increases your subject expertise but also enhances job opportunities in today’s competitive tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Matteo Golfarelli

Trending Scientists