World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Masakuni Kameyama

Masakuni Kameyama

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 51 5563 5112 175 166 415 8756

Masakuni Kameyama publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Masakuni Kameyama between 1954 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Masakuni Kameyama published across 63 years, from 1954 to 2016, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 1987. 2 of the 441 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1954 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 1987. 1954: 1 publication 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 2 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 1 publication 1962: 0 publications 1963: 3 publications 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 5 publications 1976: 17 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 6 publications 1979: 14 publications 1980: 12 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 17 publications 1983: 20 publications 1984: 16 publications 1985: 25 publications 1986: 34 publications 1987: 42 publications 1988: 24 publications 1989: 28 publications 1990: 29 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication
1954 2016

441 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Masakuni Kameyama: publications per year, 1954 to 2016
Year Publications
1954 1
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 2
1959 0
1960 0
1961 1
1962 0
1963 3
1964 1
1965 0
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 1
1972 0
1973 1
1974 2
1975 5
1976 17
1977 5
1978 6
1979 14
1980 12
1981 5
1982 17
1983 20
1984 16
1985 25
1986 34
1987 42
1988 24
1989 28
1990 29
1991 12
1992 9
1993 13
1994 3
1995 7
1996 9
1997 8
1998 3
1999 12
2000 9
2001 7
2002 4
2003 1
2004 5
2005 11
2006 6
2007 1
2008 0
2009 3
2010 0
2011 0
2012 1
2013 3
2014 0
2015 1
2016 1
Total 441
Download as CSV

Masakuni Kameyama publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Masakuni Kameyama sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 408–417 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 415 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49 415
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Masakuni Kameyama D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Masakuni Kameyama sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425 51
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Lp(a) lipoprotein as a risk factor for coronary heart disease and cerebral infarction.

    A. Murai;T. Miyahara;N. Fujimoto;M. Matsuda

  • Changes in nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in Alzheimer-type dementia.

    Shun Shimohama;Takashi Taniguchi;Motohatsu Fujiwara;Masakuni Kameyama

  • Importance of the hematocrit as a risk factor in cerebral infarction.

    H Tohgi;H Yamanouchi;M Murakami;M Kameyama

  • Clinical efficacy and safety of donepezil on cognitive and global function in patients with Alzheimer's disease. A 24-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan. E2020 Study Group.

    Akira Homma;Masatoshi Takeda;Yukimichi Imai;Fukashi Udaka

  • Regional cerebral blood flow in Parkinson disease with nonpsychotic visual hallucinations.

    N. Oishi;F. Udaka;M. Kameyama;N. Sawamoto

  • Age-related changes of pyramidal cell basal dendrites in layers III and V of human motor cortex: a quantitative Golgi study.

    S. Nakamura;I. Akiguchi;M. Kameyama;N. Mizuno

  • Pathologic laughing and crying treated with levodopa.

    Fukashi Udaka;Satoshi Yamao;Hiroshi Nagata;Sigenobu Nakamura

  • Molecular Features of the CAG Repeats of Spinocerebellar Ataxia 6 (SCA6)

    Zenjiro Matsuyama;Hideshi Kawakami;Hirofumi Maruyama;Yuishin Izumi

  • Expression of monoamine oxidase B activity in astrocytes of senile plaques.

    S. Nakamura;T. Kawamata;I. Akiguchi;M. Kameyama

  • Clinicopathologic study of progressive subcortical vascular encephalopathy (Binswanger type) in the elderly.

    Masanori Tomonaga;Hiroshi Yamanouchi;Hideo Tohgi;Mazakuni Kameyama

  • Hemodynamics in internal carotid artery occlusion examined by positron emission tomography.

    Hiroshi Yamauchi;Hidenao Fukuyama;Jun Kimura;Junji Konishi

  • Biochemical characterization of the nicotinic cholinergic receptors in human brain: binding of (-)-[3H]nicotine.

    Shun Shimohama;Takashi Taniguchi;Motohatsu Fujiwara;Masakuni Kameyama

  • SPECT findings in Parkinson's disease associated with dementia.

    H Sawada;F Udaka;M Kameyama;N Seriu

  • Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-positive, granular structures increase in the brain of senescence accelerated mouse (SAM).

    H. Akiyama;M. Kameyama;I. Akiguchi;H. Sugiyama

  • White matter lesions and dementia: MRI-pathological correlation.

    Fukashi Udaka;Hideyuki Sawada;Masakuni Kameyama

  • Marked reduction in CSF lactate and pyruvate levels after CoQ therapy in a patient with mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes (MELAS).

    K. Abe;H. Fujimura;Y. Nishikawa;S. Yorifuji

  • MRI demonstration of cortical laminar necrosis and delayed white matter injury in anoxic encephalopathy

    H Sawada;F Udaka;N Seriu;K Shindou

  • Impaired visual acuity as a risk factor for visual hallucinations in Parkinson's disease.

    Hideaki Matsui;Fukashi Udaka;Akiko Tamura;Masaya Oda

  • Increased gastric motility during 5-HT4 agonist therapy reduces response fluctuations in Parkinson's disease.

    Hirohide Asai;Fukashi Udaka;Makito Hirano;Takeshi Minami

  • Sympathetic disturbances increase risk of sudden cardiac arrest in sporadic ALS

    Hirohide Asai;Makito Hirano;Fukashi Udaka;Keiji Shimada

  • Biochemical Characterization of α-Adrenergic Receptors in Human Brain and Changes in Alzheimer-Type Dementia

    Shun Shimohama;Takashi Taniguchi;Motohatsu Fujiwara;Masakuni Kameyama

Frequent Co-Authors

Hidenao Fukuyama
Hidenao Fukuyama Kyoto University
Jun Kimura
Jun Kimura University of Iowa
Shun Shimohama
Shun Shimohama Sapporo Medical University
Hideo Tohgi
Hideo Tohgi Iwate Medical University
Takashi Taniguchi
Takashi Taniguchi National Institute for Materials Science
Hideshi Kawakami
Hideshi Kawakami Hiroshima University
Hiroshi Kimura
Hiroshi Kimura Tokyo Institute of Technology
Toshio Takeda
Toshio Takeda Kyoto University
Masatoshi Takeda
Masatoshi Takeda Izumi University
Hiroshi Sugiyama
Hiroshi Sugiyama Kyoto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in neuroscience can open many doors, but it’s important to explore related fields and flexible study options. Today, many students opt for an online bachelor's degree to fast-track their education while balancing other commitments. These programs provide the foundational knowledge needed to launch a career in neuroscience or a related health science field.

When planning for the future, salary prospects and employability also play a key role. Some of the top paying degrees relate closely to neuroscience, including biomedical engineering and other science-driven specialties. For students wanting to maximize income potential without pursuing an overly complex path, it’s worth exploring some of the easiest college majors with high pay.

Affordability is another major consideration. Thankfully, many of the cheapest online colleges accept federal aid and offer accredited programs in neuroscience and allied disciplines. By exploring both financial and academic pathways, students can find an option that fits their goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Masakuni Kameyama

Recently Published Articles