World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
36
Citations
12068
World Ranking
7038
National Ranking
2429

Mary P. Anderson publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary P. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 130 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Mary P. Anderson D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary P. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For leadership in the development of groundwater-flow models.
  • 1999 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America

Overview

Mary P. Anderson is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. The scientist's work has contributed to the field of groundwater-flow modeling, as indicated by recognition from the National Academy of Engineering.

Throughout their career, Anderson has been acknowledged by several professional organizations. They were made a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union in 1999 and are also a Fellow of the Geological Society of America. In 2006, Anderson was inducted as a Member of the National Academy of Engineering with a citation recognizing leadership in the development of groundwater-flow models.

The scientist's research addresses key aspects of environmental and geological processes, specifically related to groundwater dynamics. Although publication and co-author details are not listed, the focus on groundwater-flow modeling suggests an expertise in hydrology and related earth sciences.

Best Publications

  • Applied Groundwater Modeling: Simulation of Flow and Advective Transport

    Mary P. Anderson;William W. Woessner

  • Heat as a ground water tracer.

    Mary P. Anderson

  • Introduction to Groundwater Modeling: Finite Difference and Finite Element Methods

    Herbert Wang;Mary P. Anderson

  • Using models to simulate the movement of contaminants through groundwater flow systems

    Mary P. Anderson;John A. Cherry

  • Estimating groundwater exchange with lakes: 1. The stable isotope mass balance method

    David P. Krabbenhoft;Carl J. Bowser;Mary P. Anderson;John W. Valley

  • Hydrogeologic facies models to delineate large-scale spatial trends in glacial and glaciofluvial sediments

    Mary P. Anderson

  • Identifying spatial variability of groundwater discharge in a wetland stream using a distributed temperature sensor

    Christopher S. Lowry;John F. Walker;Randall J. Hunt;Mary P. Anderson

  • Groundwater Inflow Measurements in Wetland Systems

    Randy J. Hunt;David P. Krabbenhoft;Mary P. Anderson

  • Simulation of Preferential Flow in Three-Dimensional, Heterogeneous Conductivity Fields with Realistic Internal Architecture

    Erik K. Webb;Mary P. Anderson

  • The role of the postaudit in model validation

    Mary P. Anderson;William W. Woessner

  • Seasonal reversals of groundwater flow around lakes and the relevance to stagnation points and lake budgets

    Mary P. Anderson;James A. Munter

  • Sedimentology and hydrogeology of two braided stream deposits

    M.P Anderson;J.S Aiken;E.K Webb;D.M Mickelson

  • Effects of climate and land management change on streamflow in the driftless area of Wisconsin

    Paul F. Juckem;Randall J. Hunt;Mary P. Anderson;Dale M. Robertson

  • Improving a Complex Finite-Difference Ground Water Flow Model Through the Use of an Analytic Element Screening Model

    Randall J. Hunt;Mary P. Anderson;Victor A. Kelson

  • Groundwater's dynamic role in regulating acidity and chemistry in a precipitation-dominated lake

    Galen J Kenoyer;Galen J Kenoyer;Mary P Anderson;Mary P Anderson

  • Estimating groundwater exchange with lakes: 2. Calibration of a three‐dimensional, solute transport model to a stable isotope plume

    David P. Krabbenhoft;Mary P. Anderson;Carl J. Bowser

  • Investigation of Aldicarb in Ground Water in Selected Areas of the Central Sand Plain of Wisconsin

    E. R. Rothschild;R. J. Manser;M. P. Anderson

  • Ground penetrating radar and spring formation in a groundwater dominated peat wetland

    Christopher S. Lowry;Dante Fratta;Mary P. Anderson

  • Long- and short-term transience in a groundwater/lake system in Wisconsin, USA

    Mary P. Anderson;Xiangxue Cheng

  • An assessment of aquifer storage recovery using ground water flow models.

    Christopher S. Lowry;Mary P. Anderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Randall J. Hunt
Randall J. Hunt United States Geological Survey
David P. Krabbenhoft
David P. Krabbenhoft United States Geological Survey
Chunmiao Zheng
Chunmiao Zheng Southern University of Science and Technology
David M. Mickelson
David M. Mickelson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Herbert F. Wang
Herbert F. Wang University of Wisconsin–Madison
Dale M. Robertson
Dale M. Robertson United States Geological Survey
Danny Marks
Danny Marks Agricultural Research Service
Jeff Dozier
Jeff Dozier University of California, Santa Barbara
John E. McCray
John E. McCray Colorado School of Mines
George R. Aiken
George R. Aiken United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Earth Science, exploring related online degree options can broaden career opportunities. Many programs offer flexible learning formats, allowing students to balance studies with personal and professional commitments. Those seeking affordable and efficient paths may find programs akin to spanish degree online helpful examples of balancing cost and duration.

Veterans looking to transition into Earth Science or related fields can benefit from tailored support systems in academia. Programs similar to online spanish degree programs for veterans demonstrate dedicated resources and flexible options designed specifically for veteran students.

Creative professionals may find value in exploring interdisciplinary studies, like those offered through online mfa programs. Such degrees can complement scientific expertise with skills in communication and visualization, important for outreach and education roles.

Additionally, advancing into leadership roles within environmental organizations or research teams often calls for knowledge in management. Pursuing a masters degree in human resource management online can equip students with essential tools for managing people and projects effectively in scientific settings.

Best Scientists Citing Mary P. Anderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles