World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carlyle Smith

Carlyle Smith

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 36 8908 8225 525 479 78 8558
Social Sciences and Humanities 36 6384 5932 383 367 78 8558

Carlyle Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carlyle Smith between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carlyle Smith published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 1.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2011. 3 of the 82 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2011. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 7 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 3 publications
1974 2025

82 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carlyle Smith: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 1
1991 4
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 3
1997 1
1998 2
1999 2
2000 4
2001 3
2002 1
2003 6
2004 3
2005 1
2006 3
2007 3
2008 1
2009 1
2010 6
2011 8
2012 0
2013 1
2014 7
2015 2
2016 2
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 3
Total 82
Download as CSV

Carlyle Smith publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlyle Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 74–83 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 78 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225 78
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Carlyle Smith D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlyle Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261 36
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Carlyle Smith is affiliated with Trent University in Canada. Their research contributions span several areas, with publications appearing in diverse academic journals.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Content analysis of the dreams of a medical intuitive, 2021, published in EXPLORE
  • Acknowledgment of Reviewers - 2021, 2021, published in Dreaming
  • The Role of Leadership in Quiet Quitting, 2025, published in Journal of the American College of Radiology
  • 93PA longitudinal natural history study of giant axonal neuropathy, 2025, published in Neuromuscular Disorders
  • Adrenal abscesses: an uncommon and unexpected cause of the acute abdomen, 2025, published in Emergency Radiology

The scope of these publications indicates involvement in topics related to medical imaging, neuromuscular disorders, and clinical case analyses, although precise fields and subfields of study are not explicitly listed.

Frequent collaborators with Smith include:

  • Donna-Marie Newfield
  • Bianca Acevedo
  • Anat Arzi
  • Mark Blagrove
  • Luiza Bontempo

Smith's articles have appeared in the following venues:

  • EXPLORE
  • Dreaming
  • Journal of the American College of Radiology
  • Neuromuscular Disorders
  • Emergency Radiology

Best Publications

  • Experience-dependent changes in cerebral activation during human REM sleep

    Pierre Maquet;Pierre Maquet;Steven Laureys;Philippe Peigneux;Sonia Fuchs

  • The function of the sleep spindle: a physiological index of intelligence and a mechanism for sleep-dependent memory consolidation.

    Stuart M. Fogel;Carlyle T. Smith

  • Sleep states and memory processes

    Carlyle Smith

  • Learning-dependent changes in sleep spindles and Stage 2 sleep

    Stuart M. Fogel;Carlyle T. Smith

  • Sleep states and learning: a review of the animal literature.

    Carlyle Smith

  • Dissociable learning-dependent changes in REM and non-REM sleep in declarative and procedural memory systems.

    Stuart M. Fogel;Carlyle T. Smith;Kimberly A. Cote

  • Sleep and brain plasticity

    Pierre Maquet;Carlyle Smith;Robert Stickgold

  • Sleep states, memory processes and synaptic plasticity.

    Carlyle Smith

  • Impaired motor memory for a pursuit rotor task following Stage 2 sleep loss in college students

    Carlyle Smith;Christine Macneill

  • Evidence for a paradoxical sleep window for place learning in the Morris water maze

    Carlyle Smith;Gregory M. Rose

  • The Typical Dreams of Canadian University Students

    Tore A. Nielsen;Antonio L. Zadra;Valérie Simard;Sébastien Saucier

  • Rates of cerebral protein synthesis are linked to slow wave sleep in the rat.

    Peter Ramm;Carlyle T. Smith

  • Increases in number of REMS and REM density in humans following an intensive learning period.

    Carlyle Smith;Lorelei Lapp

  • Sleep spindles and learning potential.

    S M Fogel;R Nader;K A Cote;C T Smith

  • Posttraining increases in REM sleep intensity implicate REM sleep in memory processing and provide a biological marker of learning potential.

    Carlyle T. Smith;Margaret R. Nixon;Rebecca S. Nader

  • Brief paradoxical sleep deprivation impairs reference, but not working, memory in the radial arm maze task.

    Carlyle T. Smith;James M. Conway;Gregory M. Rose

  • Experience-dependent changes in cerebral functional connectivity during human rapid eye movement sleep.

    S Laureys;P Peigneux;C Phillips;S Fuchs

  • Paradoxical sleep at selective times following training is necessary for learning

    Carlyle Smith;Stephen Butler

  • Posttraining paradoxical sleep in rats is increased after spatial learning in the Morris water maze.

    Carlyle Smith;Gregory M. Rose

  • Increased paradoxical sleep in mice during acquisition of a shock avoidance task.

    Carlyle Smith;Carlyle Smith;Kunio Kitahama;Kunio Kitahama;Jean-Louis Valatx;Jean-Louis Valatx;Michel Jouvet;Michel Jouvet

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart M. Fogel
Stuart M. Fogel University of Ottawa
Pierre Maquet
Pierre Maquet University of Liège
Richard J. Beninger
Richard J. Beninger Queen's University
Philippe Peigneux
Philippe Peigneux Université Libre de Bruxelles
Christophe Phillips
Christophe Phillips University of Liège
Steven Laureys
Steven Laureys University of Liège
Axel Cleeremans
Axel Cleeremans Université Libre de Bruxelles
André Luxen
André Luxen University of Liège
Christian Degueldre
Christian Degueldre University of Liège
Tore Nielsen
Tore Nielsen University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Social Sciences and Humanities? There are a variety of flexible and affordable online degree options now available that can open doors to rewarding careers in counseling, education, and psychology.

For those interested in clinical or counseling psychology, psyd programs online offer a pathway to advanced psychological practice without the need to relocate or attend campus full-time. Similarly, aspiring marriage and family therapists can benefit from accelerated mft programs online, which shorten the time to graduation and help you launch your career sooner.

If affordability is a priority, exploring a masters in psychology online cheap can make advanced study more accessible. For educators and professionals looking to advance in leadership or administration, pursuing one of the easiest edd programs online can provide added flexibility and faster completion times.

These programs reflect the expanding range of online pathways in the social sciences and humanities, offering students more opportunities to match their educational journey with their career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Carlyle Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles