World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin Hassellöv

Martin Hassellöv

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
15628
World Ranking
5937
National Ranking
107

Martin Hassellöv publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Hassellöv sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 114 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Martin Hassellöv D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Hassellöv sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Are We Speaking the Same Language? Recommendations for a Definition and Categorization Framework for Plastic Debris.

    Nanna B. Hartmann;Thorsten Hüffer;Richard C. Thompson;Martin Hassellöv

  • The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles

    Richard D. Handy;Frank von der Kammer;Jamie R. Lead;Martin Hassellöv

  • Detection and characterization of engineered nanoparticles in food and the environment

    Karen Tiede;Alistair B A Boxall;Steven P Tear;John Lewis

  • Nanoparticle analysis and characterization methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles

    Martin Hassellöv;James W. Readman;James F. Ranville;Karen Tiede;Karen Tiede

  • Screening for microplastics in sediment, water, marine invertebrates and fish: Method development and microplastic accumulation

    Therese M. Karlsson;Therese M. Karlsson;A. Dick Vethaak;Bethanie Carney Almroth;Freek Ariese

  • Nanomaterials for environmental studies: Classification, reference material issues, and strategies for physico-chemical characterisation

    Vicki Stone;Bernd Nowack;Anders Baun;Nico van den Brink

  • Considerations for environmental fate and ecotoxicity testing to support environmental risk assessments for engineered nanoparticles

    Karen Tiede;Martin Hassellöv;Eike Breitbarth;Qasim Chaudhry

  • Microplastics in sub-surface waters of the Arctic Central Basin

    La Daana K. Kanhai;La Daana K. Kanhai;Katarina Gårdfeldt;Olga Lyashevska;Martin Hassellöv

  • Size discrimination and detection capabilities of single-particle ICPMS for environmental analysis of silver nanoparticles.

    Unknown

  • Competition between iron- and carbon-based colloidal carriers for trace metals in a freshwater assessed using flow field-flow fractionation coupled to ICPMS

    Unknown

  • Characterization of the effluent from a nanosilver producing washing machine.

    Julia Farkas;Julia Farkas;Hannes Peter;Paul Christian;Julián Alberto Gallego Urrea

  • Silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate induce high toxicity to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Daphnia magna and Danio rerio.

    Fabianne Ribeiro;Julián Alberto Gallego-Urrea;Kerstin Jurkschat;Alison Crossley

  • Effects of silver and gold nanoparticles on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hepatocytes.

    Julia Farkas;Paul Christian;Julián Alberto Gallego Urrea;Norbert Roos

  • Rapid, high-precision potentiometric titration of alkalinity in ocean and sediment pore waters

    Conny Haraldsson;Leif G. Anderson;Martin Hassellöv;Stefan Hulth

  • The unaccountability case of plastic pellet pollution.

    Unknown

  • Iron Oxides as Geochemical Nanovectors for Metal Transport in Soil-River Systems

    Martin Hassellöv;Frank von der Kammer

  • Uptake and effects of manufactured silver nanoparticles in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) gill cells

    Julia Farkas;Julia Farkas;Paul Christian;Julián Alberto Gallego-Urrea;Norbert Roos

  • Determination of continuous size and trace element distribution of colloidal material in natural water by on-line coupling of flow field-flow fractionation with ICPMS

    Unknown

  • Size and composition of colloidal organic matter and trace elements in the Mississippi River, Pearl River and the northern Gulf of Mexico, as characterized by flow field-flow fractionation

    Björn Stolpe;Laodong Guo;Alan M. Shiller;Martin Hassellöv

  • Comparison between manta trawl and in situ pump filtration methods, and guidance for visual identification of microplastics in surface waters

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Backhaus
Thomas Backhaus University of Gothenburg
Alistair B.A. Boxall
Alistair B.A. Boxall University of York
Stefan Gustafsson
Stefan Gustafsson Science for Life Laboratory
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson Plymouth University
Antonio Marcomini
Antonio Marcomini Ca Foscari University of Venice
Jamie R. Lead
Jamie R. Lead University of South Carolina
Maiju Lehtiniemi
Maiju Lehtiniemi Finnish Environment Institute
Kevin V. Thomas
Kevin V. Thomas University of Queensland
Thilo Hofmann
Thilo Hofmann University of Vienna
Eva Olsson
Eva Olsson Chalmers University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees that complement and expand career opportunities. For those seeking a foundational or less intensive option, exploring the easy bachelor's degree paths can be a great starting point, allowing students to build core knowledge efficiently.

For students interested in earth systems and natural resource management, pursuing a geology online degree offers comprehensive insights into geoscience with the flexibility of remote learning. Additionally, skills in spatial data analysis are highly valued, and enrolling in one of the best gis programs can enhance technical expertise that is critical in environmental monitoring and planning.

For mid-career professionals aiming to pivot or advance into leadership roles within environmental policy or public administration, the easiest online mpa programs provide streamlined pathways to gain administrative skills while maintaining current job commitments. These diverse degree options ensure tailored educational routes aligned with specific career goals in the environmental sciences field.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Hassellöv