World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
63
Citations
14454
World Ranking
3393
National Ranking
23

Martha Feucht publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha Feucht sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 244 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Martha Feucht D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha Feucht sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martha Feucht is affiliated with the Medical University of Vienna in Austria. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these, their work touches on several subfields including Physiology, Genetics, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
  • Epilepsy Research and Treatment
  • Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Polyomavirus and Related Diseases
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases

Martha Feucht has coauthored numerous papers with frequent collaborators such as Christian Dorfer, Sergiusz Jóźwiak, Eleonora Aronica, Gregor Kasprian, and Matthias Tomschik.

Key publication venues where Feucht has contributed multiple works include Epilepsia and Brain and Spine, each with eight publications, as well as Frontiers in Neurology with six, Proceedings on CD-ROM from the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine also with six, and the Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology with three publications.

Representative recent papers by this scientist include:

  • Seizure outcome and use of antiepileptic drugs after epilepsy surgery according to histopathological diagnosis: a retrospective multicentre cohort study, 2020, The Lancet Neurology
  • Prevention of Epilepsy in Infants with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex in the EPISTOP Trial, 2020, Annals of Neurology
  • GWAS meta-analysis of over 29,000 people with epilepsy identifies 26 risk loci and subtype-specific genetic architecture, 2023, Nature Genetics
  • Amplification of human interneuron progenitors promotes brain tumors and neurological defects, 2022, Science
  • TSC2 pathogenic variants are predictive of severe clinical manifestations in TSC infants: results of the EPISTOP study, 2020, Genetics in Medicine

Best Publications

  • Histopathological Findings in Brain Tissue Obtained during Epilepsy Surgery.

    Blumcke I;Spreafico R;Haaker G;Coras R

  • 15q13.3 microdeletions increase risk of idiopathic generalized epilepsy

    Ingo Helbig;Heather C. Mefford;Andrew J. Sharp;Michel Guipponi

  • Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: a consensus approach on diagnosis, assessment, management, and trial methodology

    Alexis Arzimanoglou;Jacqueline French;Warren T. Blume;J. Helen Cross

  • Recurrent microdeletions at 15q11.2 and 16p13.11 predispose to idiopathic generalized epilepsies

    Carolien G F De Kovel;Holger Trucks;Ingo Helbig;Heather C. Mefford

  • Mutations in GRIN2A cause idiopathic focal epilepsy with rolandic spikes

    Johannes R Lemke;Dennis Lal;Eva M Reinthaler;Isabelle Steiner

  • Omega-3 fatty acids supplementation in children with autism: a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study.

    G. Paul Amminger;G. Paul Amminger;Gregor E. Berger;Miriam R. Schäfer;Claudia Klier

  • Genome-wide mega-analysis identifies 16 loci and highlights diverse biological mechanisms in the common epilepsies

    Bassel Abou-Khalil;Pauls Auce;Andreja Avbersek;Melanie Bahlo

  • Seizure outcome and use of antiepileptic drugs after epilepsy surgery according to histopathological diagnosis: a retrospective multicentre cohort study

    Herm J Lamberink;Willem M Otte;Ingmar Blümcke;Kees P J Braun

  • Vagus nerve stimulation for drug‐resistant epilepsy: A European long‐term study up to 24 months in 347 children

    Iren Orosz;David McCormick;Nelia Zamponi;Sophia Varadkar

  • Prevention of Epilepsy in Infants with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex in the EPISTOP Trial.

    Katarzyna Kotulska;David J Kwiatkowski;Paolo Curatolo;Bernhard Weschke

  • Management of epilepsy associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC): clinical recommendations.

    Paolo Curatolo;Rima Nabbout;Lieven Lagae;Eleonora Aronica

  • Epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis complex: Findings from the TOSCA Study.

    Rima Nabbout;Elena Belousova;Mirjana P. Benedik;Tom Carter

  • Consensus on diagnosis and management of JME: From founder's observations to current trends.

    Dorothée G.A. Kasteleijn Nolst Trenité;Bettina Schmitz;Bettina Schmitz;Dieter Janz;Dieter Janz;Antonio V. Delgado-Escueta;Antonio V. Delgado-Escueta

  • The Original Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker Family of Austria: Divergent Clinicopathological Phenotypes but Constant PrP Genotype

    Johann A. Hainfellner;Sigrid Brantner-Inthaler;Larisa Cervenáková;Paul Brown

  • Predictors for negative attitudes toward subjects with epilepsy: a representative survey in the general public in Austria.

    Josef Spatt;Gerhard Bauer;Christoph Baumgartner;Martha Feucht

  • Neuropathologic measurements in focal cortical dysplasias: validation of the ILAE 2011 classification system and diagnostic implications for MRI

    Angelika Mühlebner;Roland Coras;Katja Kobow;Martha Feucht

  • PRION PROTEIN MUTATION IN FAMILY FIRST REPORTED BY GERSTMANN, STRAUSSLER, AND SCHEINKER

    HansA. Kretzschmar;Georg Honold;Franz Seitelberger;M. Feucht

  • Genome-wide association analysis of genetic generalized epilepsies implicates susceptibility loci at 1q43, 2p16.1, 2q22.3 and 17q21.32

    Michael Steffens;Costin Leu

  • TSC-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND): findings from the TOSCA natural history study

    Petrus J de Vries;Elena Belousova;Mirjana P Benedik;Tom Carter

  • Efficacy and tolerability of the ketogenic diet in Dravet syndrome – Comparison with various standard antiepileptic drug regimen

    Anastasia Dressler;Petra Trimmel-Schwahofer;Eva Reithofer;Angelika Mühlebner

  • Glatiramer Acetate Treatment in Patients with Childhood and Juvenile Onset Multiple Sclerosis

    B. Kornek;G. Bernert;C. Balassy;J. Geldner

  • A GABRB3 promoter haplotype associated with childhood absence epilepsy impairs transcriptional activity

    Lydia Urak;Martha Feucht;Nahid Fathi;Kurt Hornik

Frequent Co-Authors

Paolo Curatolo
Paolo Curatolo University of Rome Tor Vergata
Rima Nabbout
Rima Nabbout Université Paris Cité
Eleonora Aronica
Eleonora Aronica University of Amsterdam
Thomas Sander
Thomas Sander University of Cologne
Floor E. Jansen
Floor E. Jansen Utrecht University
Pavel Krsek
Pavel Krsek Czech Technical University in Prague
Vincent Cottin
Vincent Cottin Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Lieven Lagae
Lieven Lagae KU Leuven
David J. Kwiatkowski
David J. Kwiatkowski Brigham and Women's Hospital
Felix Rosenow
Felix Rosenow Goethe University Frankfurt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA opens up opportunities in healthcare, technology, and cutting-edge research. If you're exploring related fields, it's helpful to know which programs align with your budget and career goals. Some of the highest paying college majors include STEM disciplines like neuroscience, biology, and computer science, all of which can complement a neuroscience background.

Affordability is often a key concern for students. Many reputable online colleges that accept financial aid make it possible to pursue your degree without overwhelming student debt. Additionally, if you are interested in skills-based credentials, there are a wide range of what certificates can i get online that can boost your qualifications in data analysis, mental health, or lab technologies.

For those seeking a flexible and cost-effective option, check out the cheapest easiest online degree programs. These pathways can provide a strong foundation for further studies or entry-level roles in neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Martha Feucht

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles