World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
23692
World Ranking
17523
National Ranking
199

Caj Haglund publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caj Haglund sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 476 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Caj Haglund D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caj Haglund sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Caj Haglund is a researcher affiliated with the University of Helsinki in Finland. Their scholarly work is primarily situated within the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to Oncology, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, and Immunology as key subfields.

Their research topics include:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis

Haglund has published papers in several notable scientific journals, with recurrent contributions to venues such as Scientific Reports, Oncology, HPB, Cancers, and Tumor Biology.

Recent publications by Haglund include:

  • "Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in oropharyngeal cancer: a validation study according to the criteria of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group" (2022) published in British Journal of Cancer
  • "Postoperative serum CA19-9, YKL-40, CRP and IL-6 in combination with CEA as prognostic markers for recurrence and survival in colorectal cancer" (2020) published in Acta Oncologica
  • "CA125: A superior prognostic biomarker for colorectal cancer compared to CEA, CA19-9 or CA242" (2021) published in Tumor Biology
  • "Stromal categorization in early oral tongue cancer" (2020) published in Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin
  • "The prognostic role of tissue TLR2 and TLR4 in colorectal cancer" (2020) published in Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin

Collaboration is notable in Haglund's work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Jaana Hagström
  • Hanna Seppänen
  • Harri Mustonen
  • Antti Mäkitie
  • Tuomas Kaprio

The scientist's body of work demonstrates a focus on cancer biology, biomarker development, and clinical prognostic factors. The integration of molecular biology and immunology perspectives reflects in research on tumor microenvironment and inflammatory biomarkers.

Haglund's publication record includes a broad range of research articles contributing to the understanding of tumor pathology, cancer prognosis, and treatment pathways, particularly in pancreatic, hepatic, colorectal, and head and neck cancers.

Best Publications

  • Prognostic significance of elevated cyclooxygenase-2 expression in breast cancer.

    Ari Ristimäki;Anna Sivula;Johan Lundin;Mikael Lundin

  • Tumour markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines for clinical use.

    M.J. Duffy;A. van Dalen;C. Haglund;L. Hansson

  • Deep learning based tissue analysis predicts outcome in colorectal cancer

    Dmitrii Bychkov;Nina Linder;Nina Linder;Riku Turkki;Stig Nordling

  • National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers

    Catharine M. Sturgeon;Michael J. Duffy;Ulf Håkan Stenman;Hans Lilja

  • Clinical utility of biochemical markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines.

    M.J Duffy;A van Dalen;C Haglund;L Hansson

  • Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer: a European Group on Tumor Markers (EGTM) status report

    M.J. Duffy;C. Sturgeon;R. Lamerz;C. Haglund

  • Does anyone survive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A nationwide study re-evaluating the data of the Finnish Cancer Registry

    M Carpelan-Holmström;S Nordling;E Pukkala;R Sankila

  • Tumor markers in colorectal cancer, gastric cancer and gastrointestinal stromal cancers: European group on tumor markers 2014 guidelines update

    M.J. Duffy;R. Lamerz;C. Haglund;A. Nicolini

  • Prognostic significance of elevated cyclooxygenase 2 expression in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

    Christianne J. Buskens;Bastiaan P. van Rees;Anna Sivula;Johannes B. Reitsma

  • CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 improve the diagnostic accuracy in gastrointestinal cancers.

    M Carpelan-Holmström;J Louhimo;U H Stenman;H Alfthan

  • Cytoplasmic HuR Expression Is a Prognostic Factor in Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma

    Mira Heinonen;Petri Bono;Kirsi Narko;Sung-Hee Chang

  • MYC-Dependent Regulation and Prognostic Role of CIP2A in Gastric Cancer

    Anchit Khanna;Camilla Böckelman;Annabrita Hemmes;Melissa R. Junttila

  • Transcription Factor PROX1 Induces Colon Cancer Progression by Promoting the Transition from Benign to Highly Dysplastic Phenotype

    Tatiana Petrova;Antti Nykänen;Camilla Norrmen;Konstantin I Ivanov

  • Comparison of a new tumour marker, CA 19-9, with alpha-fetoprotein and carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with upper gastrointestinal diseases

    Hannu Jalanko;Pentti Ilmari Kuusela;Peter J. Roberts;Pentti Ilmari Sipponen

  • Cyclooxygenase-2 is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer and its expression is regulated by the messenger RNA stability factor HuR.

    Johanna Mrena;Jan-Patrik Wiksten;Alexandra Thiel;Arto Kokkola

  • Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

    Ari Ristimäki;Outi Nieminen;Kirsi Saukkonen;Kristina Hotakainen

  • Cytoplasmic HuR expression correlates with poor outcome and with cyclooxygenase 2 expression in serous ovarian carcinoma.

    Tiina-Liisa Erkinheimo;Heini Lassus;Anna Sivula;Sibani Sengupta

  • Concentrations of human choriogonadotropin, its beta-subunit, and the core fragment of the beta-subunit in serum and urine of men and nonpregnant women.

    Henrik V Alfthan;Caj Hilding Haglund;Jan Dabek;Ulf Håkan Evald Stenman

  • Cyclooxygenase-2 and gastric carcinogenesis.

    Kirsi Saukkonen;Johanna Rintahaka;Anna Sivula;Christianne J. Buskens

  • Tumour marker antigen CA125 in pancreatic cancer: a comparison with CA19-9 and CEA.

    Caj Hilding Haglund

Frequent Co-Authors

Ari Ristimäki
Ari Ristimäki University of Helsinki
Ulf-Håkan Stenman
Ulf-Håkan Stenman University of Helsinki
Timo Sorsa
Timo Sorsa University of Helsinki
Tuula Salo
Tuula Salo University of Helsinki
Pentti Kuusela
Pentti Kuusela University of Helsinki
Risto Renkonen
Risto Renkonen University of Helsinki
Kari Alitalo
Kari Alitalo University of Helsinki
Leif C. Andersson
Leif C. Andersson University of Helsinki
Olli Carpén
Olli Carpén University of Helsinki
Stina Syrjänen
Stina Syrjänen University of Turku

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in medicine or looking to advance your career, online degrees offer flexible options to match your goals. Nursing professionals, for instance, may benefit from exploring rn to bsn programs no clinicals. These programs can expedite degree completion without the need for traditional in-person clinical hours, making them ideal for working nurses.

For those aiming for roles in advanced nursing practice or leadership, the fastest msn to dnp program options allow experienced nurses to earn doctoral credentials in less time through intensive online coursework. Alternatively, budget-conscious students may prefer to look into the cheapest online dnp programs, balancing affordability and accreditation without sacrificing quality.

If you’re seeking a faster entry into the nursing profession, accelerated lpn programs provide fast-track pathways to start working sooner. With so many accredited online healthcare degrees now available, you can find a pathway that fits your schedule, budget, and career ambitions while still advancing in the dynamic medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Caj Haglund

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles