World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
8389
World Ranking
9111
National Ranking
762

Marlene Bartos publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marlene Bartos sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 72 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Marlene Bartos D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marlene Bartos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marlene Bartos is affiliated with the University of Freiburg in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of Neuroscience, focusing particularly on Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Neurology, Molecular Biology, and Sensory Systems.

The scientist's main research topics cover Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, Memory and Neural Mechanisms, Neural dynamics and brain function, Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms, Photoreceptor and optogenetics research, Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies.

Recent notable publications by Marlene Bartos include:

  • Dentate gyrus circuits for encoding, retrieval and discrimination of episodic memories, 2020, Nature reviews. Neuroscience
  • The hippocampus converts dynamic entorhinal inputs into stable spatial maps, 2021, Neuron
  • Hippocampal low-frequency stimulation prevents seizure generation in a mouse model of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, 2020, eLife
  • Resolving the prefrontal mechanisms of adaptive cognitive behaviors: A cross-species perspective, 2023, Neuron
  • Topographically organized representation of space and context in the medial prefrontal cortex, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent co-authors include Jonas-Frederic Sauer, Thomas Hainmueller, Shani Folschweiller, Thibault Cholvin, and Hannah Muysers, indicating collaboration across a network of researchers with strengths in related fields.

Bartos has published repeatedly in several venues known for neuroscience research, such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Neuron, Nature Communications, and Cell Reports.

Best Publications

  • Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks

    Marlene Bartos;Imre Vida;Peter Jonas

  • Fast synaptic inhibition promotes synchronized gamma oscillations in hippocampal interneuron networks.

    Marlene Bartos;Imre Vida;Michael Frotscher;Axel Meyer

  • Dentate gyrus circuits for encoding, retrieval and discrimination of episodic memories

    Thomas Hainmueller;Marlene Bartos

  • Hippocampal theta rhythm and its coupling with gamma oscillations require fast inhibition onto parvalbumin-positive interneurons

    Peer Wulff;Alexey A. Ponomarenko;Marlene Bartos;Tatiana M. Korotkova

  • Parallel emergence of stable and dynamic memory engrams in the hippocampus

    Thomas Hainmueller;Marlene Bartos

  • Shunting inhibition improves robustness of gamma oscillations in hippocampal interneuron networks by homogenizing firing rates.

    Imre Vida;Marlene Bartos;Peter Jonas

  • Rapid signaling at inhibitory synapses in a dentate gyrus interneuron network.

    Marlene Bartos;Imre Vida;Michael Frotscher;Jörg R. P. Geiger

  • Parvalbumin-positive CA1 interneurons are required for spatial working but not for reference memory

    Andrew J Murray;Jonas-Frederic Sauer;Jonas-Frederic Sauer;Gernot Riedel;Christina McClure

  • Postnatal Differentiation of Basket Cells from Slow to Fast Signaling Devices

    Daniel Doischer;Jonas Aurel Hosp;Yuchio Yanagawa;Kunihiko Obata

  • Organization of prefrontal network activity by respiration-related oscillations

    Jonatan Biskamp;Marlene Bartos;Jonas-Frederic Sauer

  • Coordination of Fast and Slow Rhythmic Neuronal Circuits

    Marlene Bartos;Yair Manor;Farzan Nadim;Eve Marder

  • Functional characteristics of parvalbumin‐ and cholecystokinin‐expressing basket cells

    Marlene Bartos;Claudio Elgueta

  • Distinct nonuniform cable properties optimize rapid and efficient activation of fast-spiking GABAergic interneurons

    Anja Nörenberg;Hua Hu;Imre Vida;Marlene Bartos

  • Intercircuit Control of Motor Pattern Modulation by Presynaptic Inhibition

    Marlene Bartos;Michael P. Nusbaum

  • Synaptic Properties of SOM- and CCK-Expressing Cells in Dentate Gyrus Interneuron Networks

    Shakuntala Savanthrapadian;Thomas Meyer;Claudio Elgueta;Sam A Booker

  • Morpho-physiological criteria divide dentate gyrus interneurons into classes

    Jonas A. Hosp;Michael Strüber;Yuchio Yanagawa;Kunihiko Obata

  • Seed-induced Aβ deposition is modulated by microglia under environmental enrichment in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Stephanie Ziegler‐Waldkirch;Paolo d′Errico;Jonas‐Frederic Sauer;Daniel Erny

  • Impaired fast-spiking interneuron function in a genetic mouse model of depression

    Jonas-Frederic Sauer;Michael Strüber;Marlene Bartos

  • Associative plasticity at excitatory synapses facilitates recruitment of fast-spiking interneurons in the dentate gyrus.

    Sivakumar Sambandan;Jonas-Frederic Sauer;Imre Vida;Marlene Bartos

  • Somatostatin-positive interneurons in the dentate gyrus of mice provide local- and long-range septal synaptic inhibition

    Mei Yuan;Thomas Meyer;Christoph Benkowitz;Shakuntala Savanthrapadian

Frequent Co-Authors

Imre Vida
Imre Vida Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Peter Jonas
Peter Jonas Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Akos Kulik
Akos Kulik University of Freiburg
William Wisden
William Wisden Imperial College London
Michael P. Nusbaum
Michael P. Nusbaum University of Pennsylvania
Eve Marder
Eve Marder Brandeis University
Farzan Nadim
Farzan Nadim New Jersey Institute of Technology
Yuchio Yanagawa
Yuchio Yanagawa Gunma University
Hannah Monyer
Hannah Monyer German Cancer Research Center
Kunihiko Obata
Kunihiko Obata The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students to consider related fields, many of which offer flexible online opportunities. Those interested in mental health may want to learn about earning an lmft degree online, a crucial step toward becoming a licensed marriage and family therapist.

If clinical or research psychology is your focus, understanding the how much does a masters in psychology cost is vital to planning your education. Many programs offer affordable tuition and flexible schedules.

For broader psychology studies, you can research an online psychology degree at the bachelor’s or master’s level. These degrees can open doors to diverse careers in healthcare, education, and social services.

Students passionate about social impact may pursue social work. Finding the easiest social work programs to get into can make entering this rewarding field more accessible.

No matter which degree you choose, the flexibility and affordability of online programs make it easier to align your education with neuroscience career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Marlene Bartos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles