World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
45
Citations
7691
World Ranking
19117
National Ranking
7808

Mark L. Day publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark L. Day sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 103 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mark L. Day D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark L. Day sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark L. Day is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions in Surgery, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Cancer Research.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including:

  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
  • Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Cancer Research and Treatments

Mark L. Day's frequent co-authors include:

  • Phillip L. Palmbos
  • Kathleen C. Day
  • Aaron M. Udager
  • Luke J. Broses
  • Marian L. Henderson

Publication venues where they have notably published multiple works include:

  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Heart Lung and Circulation
  • European Urology

Recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Mark L. Day include:

  • "Multiparameter urine analysis for quantitative bladder cancer surveillance of orthotopic xenografted mice," 2020, published in Lab on a Chip
  • "Interleukin 13 (IL-13)-regulated expression of the chondroprotective metalloproteinase ADAM15 is reduced in aging cartilage," 2020, published in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open
  • "Quantification and immunoprofiling of bladder cancer cell-derived extracellular vesicles with microfluidic chemiluminescent ELISA," 2021, published in Biosensors and Bioelectronics X
  • "Integrative Drug Screening and Multiomic Characterization of Patient-derived Bladder Cancer Organoids Reveal Novel Molecular Correlates of Gemcitabine Response," 2024, published in European Urology
  • "Global hotspots of mycorrhizal fungal richness are poorly protected," 2025, published in Nature

Best Publications

  • Overexpression of bcl-2 Protects Prostate Cancer Cells from Apoptosis in Vitro and Confers Resistance to Androgen Depletion in Vivo

    Anthony J. Raffo;Harris Perlman;Min-Wei Chen;Mark L. Day

  • Targeted gold nanorod contrast agent for prostate cancer detection by photoacoustic imaging

    A. Agarwal;S. W. Huang;M. O’Donnell;K. C. Day

  • Hepatocyte growth factor and its receptor (c-MET) in prostatic carcinoma.

    Peter A. Humphrey;Xiaopei Zhu;Reza Zarnegar;Paul E. Swanson

  • HER2 Drives Luminal Breast Cancer Stem Cells in the Absence of HER2 Amplification: Implications for Efficacy of Adjuvant Trastuzumab

    Suthinee Ithimakin;Kathleen C. Day;Fayaz Malik;Qin Zen

  • E-cadherin expression in prostate cancer: a broad survey using high-density tissue microarray technology.

    Mark A. Rubin;Neil R. Mucci;Jay Figurski;Alice Fecko

  • The role of Nrf2 in increased reactive oxygen species and DNA damage in prostate tumorigenesis.

    D A Frohlich;M T McCabe;R S Arnold;M L Day

  • The ectodomain shedding of E-cadherin by ADAM15 supports ErbB receptor activation.

    Abdo J. Najy;Kathleen C. Day;Mark L. Day

  • Regulation of DNA Methyltransferase 1 by the pRb/E2F1 Pathway

    Michael T. McCabe;Joanne N. Davis;Mark L. Day

  • The role of calpain in the proteolytic cleavage of E-cadherin in prostate and mammary epithelial cells.

    Jonathan Rios-Doria;Kathleen C. Day;Rainer Kuefer;Michael G. Rashid

  • Ventricular atriopeptin. Unmasking of messenger RNA and peptide synthesis by hypertrophy or dexamethasone.

    M L Day;D Schwartz;R C Wiegand;P T Stockman

  • E-cadherin mediates aggregation-dependent survival of prostate and mammary epithelial cells through the retinoblastoma cell cycle control pathway.

    M. L. Day;Xin Zhao;C. J. Vallorosi;M. Putzi

  • HER2 and EGFR overexpression support metastatic progression of prostate cancer to bone

    Kathleen C. Day;Guadalupe Lorenzatti Hiles;Molly Kozminsky;Scott J. Dawsey

  • Inhibition of DNA methyltransferase activity prevents tumorigenesis in a mouse model of prostate cancer.

    Michael T. McCabe;Jonathan A. Low;Stephanie Daignault;Michael J. Imperiale

  • Cell Anchorage Regulates Apoptosis through the Retinoblastoma Tumor Suppressor/E2F Pathway

    Mark L. Day;Rosalinda G. Foster;Kathleen C. Day;Xin Zhao

  • Elevated E2F1 inhibits transcription of the androgen receptor in metastatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer.

    Joanne N. Davis;Kirk J. Wojno;Stephanie Daignault;Matthias D. Hofer;Matthias D. Hofer

  • ADAM15 disintegrin is associated with aggressive prostate and breast cancer disease.

    Rainer Kuefer;Kathleen C. Day;Celina G. Kleer;Michael S. Sabel

  • Truncation of the β-Catenin Binding Domain of E-cadherin Precedes Epithelial Apoptosis during Prostate and Mammary Involution

    Christopher J. Vallorosi;Kathleen C. Day;Xin Zhao;Michael G. Rashid

  • Sex Hormone-induced Carcinogenesis in Rb-deficient Prostate Tissue

    Yuzhuo Wang;Simon W. Hayward;Anne A. Donjacour;Peter Young

  • Developmental changes in the rat atriopeptin hormonal system.

    Y F Wei;C P Rodi;M L Day;R C Wiegand

  • The Role of an 80 kDa Fragment of E-cadherin in the Metastatic Progression of Prostate Cancer

    Rainer Kuefer;Matthias D. Hofer;Matthias D. Hofer;Juergen E. Gschwend;Kenneth J. Pienta

Frequent Co-Authors

Maha Hussain
Maha Hussain Northwestern University
Mark A. Rubin
Mark A. Rubin University of Bern
Gerard B. Fox
Gerard B. Fox Georgetown University Medical Center
Scott A. Tomlins
Scott A. Tomlins University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Evan T. Keller
Evan T. Keller University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Arul M. Chinnaiyan
Arul M. Chinnaiyan University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Simon W. Hayward
Simon W. Hayward NorthShore University HealthSystem
Kenneth J. Pienta
Kenneth J. Pienta Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Yuzhuo Wang
Yuzhuo Wang University of British Columbia
Paul E. Swanson
Paul E. Swanson University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse, rewarding careers. Many students explore further education online, blending convenience with specialized credentials. With growing demand in health and science fields, online programs now offer flexibility for busy professionals and recent graduates alike.

Those interested in nutrition and wellness can consider a nutritionist degree online, which provides foundational knowledge in dietetics and prepares you for roles in healthcare or food science. For registered nurses aiming to enhance their qualifications, numerous rn to bsn programs offer accelerated pathways to leadership or advanced clinical positions.

Management-minded professionals can explore 1 year mha programs online to quickly advance into healthcare administration roles. Additionally, those passionate about mental health can pursue fast track mental health nursing options for specialized nurse practitioner careers.

These online degrees offer flexibility, affordability, and direct pathways to high-demand health science careers for Biology and Biochemistry graduates.

Best Scientists Citing Mark L. Day

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles