World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
44
Citations
5467
World Ranking
5172
National Ranking
30

Marek Stibal publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marek Stibal sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 100 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Marek Stibal D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marek Stibal sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marek Stibal is affiliated with Charles University in the Czech Republic. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with emphases on Atmospheric Science and Ecology. The scientist's work spans diverse subfields including Environmental Chemistry, Anthropology, and Global and Planetary Change.

The research topics covered by Marek Stibal include:

  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Polar Research and Ecology
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research

Recent publications by Marek Stibal and closely associated authors illustrate key areas of their scientific contributions. Notable papers include:

  • Glacial ecosystems are essential to understanding biodiversity responses to glacier retreat, 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Enhanced trace element mobilization by Earth's ice sheets, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Cryoconite - From minerals and organic matter to bioengineered sediments on glacier's surfaces, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Large subglacial source of mercury from the southwestern margin of the Greenland Ice Sheet, 2021, Nature Geoscience
  • Glacier Outflow Dissolved Organic Matter as a Window Into Seasonally Changing Carbon Sources: Leverett Glacier, Greenland, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences

Marek Stibal's frequent co-authors include Tyler J. Kohler, Jon Hawkings, Guillaume Lamarche-Gagnon, Jemma L. Wadham, and Karen A. Cameron. This indicates a collaborative research environment spanning multiple expertise areas related to cryospheric and environmental studies.

The scientist's works have been published in a variety of scientific venues, highlighting a concentration in both multidisciplinary and specialized journals. These venues include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Geoscience
  • Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution

Best Publications

  • Microbial Assemblages in Soil Microbial Succession After Glacial Retreat in Svalbard (High Arctic)

    Klára Kaštovská;Josef Elster;Josef Elster;Marek Stibal;Marek Stibal;Hana Šantrůčková

  • Photophysiology and albedo-changing potential of the ice algal community on the surface of the Greenland ice sheet.

    Marian L Yallop;Alexandre M B Anesio;Rupert G Perkins;J Cook

  • Biological processes on glacier and ice sheet surfaces

    Marek Stibal;Marek Stibal;Marie Šabacká;Marie Šabacká;Jakub Žárský

  • Potential methane reservoirs beneath Antarctica

    J. L. Wadham;S. Arndt;S. Arndt;S. Tulaczyk;M. Stibal

  • Microbial communities on glacier surfaces in Svalbard: impact of physical and chemical properties on abundance and structure of cyanobacteria and algae.

    Marek Stibal;Marek Stibal;Marie Šabacká;Marie Šabacká;Klára Kaštovská

  • Microbial primary production on an Arctic glacier is insignificant in comparison with allochthonous organic carbon input

    Marek Stibal;Martyn Tranter;Liane G. Benning;Josef Řehák

  • Greenland Ice Sheet exports labile organic carbon to the Arctic oceans

    Emily C. Lawson;Emily C. Lawson;Jemma L. Wadham;Martyn Tranter;Marek Stibal

  • Algae Drive Enhanced Darkening of Bare Ice on the Greenland Ice Sheet

    Marek Stibal;Marek Stibal;Jason E. Box;Karen A. Cameron;Karen A. Cameron;Peter L. Langen

  • Distinct summer and winter bacterial communities in the active layer of Svalbard permafrost revealed by DNA- and RNA-based analyses

    Morten Schostag;Morten Schostag;Marek Stibal;Marek Stibal;Carsten S. Jacobsen;Carsten S. Jacobsen;Carsten S. Jacobsen;Jacob Bælum

  • Methanogenic potential of Arctic and Antarctic subglacial environments with contrasting organic carbon sources

    Marek Stibal;Marek Stibal;Jemma L. Wadham;Grzegorz P. Lis;Jon Telling

  • Seasonal and diel changes in photosynthetic activity of the snow alga Chlamydomonas nivalis (Chlorophyceae) from Svalbard determined by pulse amplitude modulation fluorometry.

    Marek Stibal;Marek Stibal;Josef Elster;Josef Elster;Marie Šabacká;Marie Šabacká;Klára Kaštovská

  • Microbial community structure and ecology of subglacial sediments in two polythermal Svalbard glaciers characterized by epifluorescence microscopy and PLFA

    Klára Kaštovská;Marek Stibal;Marek Stibal;Marie Šabacká;Marie Šabacká;Barbora Černá

  • Greenland melt drives continuous export of methane from the ice-sheet bed

    Guillaume Lamarche-Gagnon;Jemma Louise Wadham;Barbara Sherwood Lollar;Sandra Arndt

  • Dark zone of the Greenland Ice Sheet controlled by distributed biologically-active impurities.

    Jonathan C. Ryan;Jonathan C. Ryan;Jonathan C. Ryan;Alun Lloyd Hubbard;Alun Lloyd Hubbard;Marek Stibal;Marek Stibal;Tristam D. Irvine-Fynn

  • Environmental Controls on Microbial Abundance and Activity on the Greenland Ice Sheet: A Multivariate Analysis Approach

    Marek Stibal;Jon Telling;Joe Cook;Ka Man Mak

  • Coupled cryoconite ecosystem structure-function relationships are revealed by comparing bacterial communities in alpine and Arctic glaciers.

    Arwyn Edwards;Luis A.J. Mur;Susan E. Girdwood;Alexandre M. Anesio

  • Different bulk and active bacterial communities in cryoconite from the margin and interior of the Greenland ice sheet.

    Marek Stibal;Marek Stibal;Morten Schostag;Karen A. Cameron;Karen A. Cameron;Lars Hestbjerg Hansen

  • Cryoconite – From minerals and organic matter to bioengineered sediments on glacier's surfaces

    Piotr Rozwalak;Paweł Podkowa;Jakub Buda;Przemysław Niedzielski

  • Glacial ecosystems are essential to understanding biodiversity responses to glacier retreat.

    Marek Stibal;James A. Bradley;Arwyn Edwards;Scott Hotaling

  • Microbial nitrogen cycling on the Greenland Ice Sheet

    Jon P Telling;Marek Stibal;Alexandre M B Anesio;Martyn Tranter

  • Laboratory investigation of inorganic carbon uptake by cryoconite debris from Werenskioldbreen, Svalbard

    Marek Stibal;Martyn Tranter

  • Glacier algae: a dark past and a darker future

    Christopher J Williamson;Karen A Cameron;Joseph M Cook;Jakub D Zarsky

  • Organic matter content and quality in supraglacial debris across the ablation zone of the Greenland ice sheet

    Marek Stibal;Emily C. Lawson;Grzegorz P. Lis;Ka Man Mak

Frequent Co-Authors

Jemma L. Wadham
Jemma L. Wadham University of Bristol
Carsten S. Jacobsen
Carsten S. Jacobsen Aarhus University
Jon Telling
Jon Telling Newcastle University
Martyn Tranter
Martyn Tranter Aarhus University
Alexandre M. Anesio
Alexandre M. Anesio Aarhus University
Alun Hubbard
Alun Hubbard University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
Jason E. Box
Jason E. Box Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland
Andy Hodson
Andy Hodson University Centre in Svalbard
Tristram Irvine-Fynn
Tristram Irvine-Fynn Aberystwyth University
Katharine R. Hendry
Katharine R. Hendry University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse career paths, both within environmental science and in healthcare where knowledge of complex systems is valuable. For those interested in healthcare, there are flexible options for further study. If you’re considering a transition, explore online accelerated nursing programs for non nurses, which provide a fast track for those with a bachelor’s degree in another field.

Once you earn a nursing degree, career advancement can be rapid. The fastest rn to bsn program options allow registered nurses to quickly obtain a BSN, opening up even more opportunities. Interested in advanced roles? Understanding how many years does it take to be a nurse practitioner can help you plan your educational journey efficiently.

Salary is also an important consideration. If you’re drawn to mental health, researching the psych np salary by state may help you decide the best career specialty based on location and earning potential. No matter your path, online degrees offer flexibility as you align your education with your passions and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Marek Stibal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles