World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
38
Citations
5713
World Ranking
8068
National Ranking
508

Marcelle McManus publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcelle McManus sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 117 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Marcelle McManus D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcelle McManus sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcelle McManus is affiliated with the University of Bath in the United Kingdom. Their research spans Environmental Science and Engineering, with a focus on Environmental Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Pollution.

The main topics in McManus's work include:

  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Global Energy and Sustainability Research
  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies

McManus's frequent co-authors are:

  • Ariane S.S. Pinto
  • Lewis McDonald
  • Linda Newnes
  • Sophie Parsons
  • Jaime Massanet-Nicolau

Publication venues where McManus has regularly contributed include:

  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Biomass and Bioenergy
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
  • International Journal of Agile Systems and Management

Recent papers authored or co-authored by McManus include:

  • Developments in the life cycle assessment of chemical recycling of plastic waste - A review, 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Review and meta-analysis of recent life cycle assessments of hydrogen production, 2023, Cleaner Environmental Systems
  • Using techno-economic modelling to determine the minimum cost possible for a microbial palm oil substitute, 2021, Biotechnology for Biofuels
  • Life cycle assessment (LCA) on waste management options for derelict fishing gear, 2023, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
  • Production of volatile fatty acids by anaerobic digestion of biowastes: Techno-economic and life cycle assessments, 2023, Bioresource Technology

Best Publications

  • Minimising the global warming potential of clay based geopolymers

    Andrew Heath;Kevin Paine;Marcelle McManus

  • Environmental consequences of the use of batteries in low carbon systems: The impact of battery production

    M.C. McManus

  • Developments in the life cycle assessment of chemical recycling of plastic waste – A review

    Matthew G. Davidson;Rebecca A. Furlong;Marcelle C. McManus

  • Prospects for and barriers to domestic micro-generation: a United Kingdom perspective

    S.R. Allen;G.P. Hammond;M.C. McManus

  • Use of LCA as a development tool within early research:Challenges and issues across different sectors

    Alexandra C. Hetherington;Aiduan Li Borrion;Owen Glyn Griffiths;Marcelle C. McManus

  • The changing nature of life cycle assessment.

    Marcelle C. McManus;Caroline M. Taylor

  • Environmental life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic conversion to ethanol: A review

    Aiduan Li Borrion;Marcelle C. McManus;Geoffrey P. Hammond

  • Development of biofuels for the UK automotive market

    G.P. Hammond;S. Kallu;M.C. McManus

  • Electricity planning and implementation in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review.

    Philipp A. Trotter;Marcelle C. McManus;Roy Maconachie

  • Global developments in the competition for land from biofuels

    Richard Murphy;Jeremy Woods;Mairi Black;Marcelle McManus

  • Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: Evaluation techniques at different stages of market and technical maturity

    Joule A. Bergerson;Adam Brandt;Joe Cresko;Michael Carbajales-Dale

  • Comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of wood pellet production with torrefaction

    P.W.R. Adams;J.E.J. Shirley;M.C. McManus

  • Economic and environmental impact of lead-acid batteries in grid-connected domestic PV systems

    Eoghan McKenna;Marcelle McManus;Sam Cooper;Murray Thomson

  • Barriers to and drivers for UK bioenergy development

    P.W. Adams;G.P. Hammond;M.C. McManus;W.G. Mezzullo

  • Life cycle assessment of a small-scale anaerobic digestion plant from cattle waste

    William G. Mezzullo;Marcelle C. McManus;Geoff P. Hammond

  • Collected marine litter - A growing waste challenge.

    Falk Schneider;Sophie Parsons;Sally Clift;Andrea Stolte

  • Environmental life cycle assessment of bioethanol production from wheat straw

    Aiduan Li Borrion;Marcelle C. McManus;Geoffrey P. Hammond

  • A comparison of carbon accounting tools for arable crops in the United Kingdom

    Carly Whittaker;Marcelle C. McManus;Pete Smith

  • Attributional life cycle assessment of mounted 1.8 kWp monocrystalline photovoltaic system with batteries and comparison with fossil energy production system

    V. Kabakian;M.C. McManus;H. Harajli

  • An assessment of the torrefaction of North American pine and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions

    P. McNamee;P.W.R. Adams;M.C. McManus;B. Dooley

  • Integrated appraisal of a Solar Hot Water system

    S.R. Allen;G.P. Hammond;H.A. Harajli;M.C. McManus

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey P. Hammond
Geoffrey P. Hammond University of Bath
Matthew D. Jones
Matthew D. Jones Neuroscience Research Australia
Danny Pudjianto
Danny Pudjianto Imperial College London
H. Scott Matthews
H. Scott Matthews Carnegie Mellon University
Iain Staffell
Iain Staffell Imperial College London
Svein J. Horn
Svein J. Horn Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Peter Smith
Peter Smith University of Aberdeen
Adam R. Brandt
Adam R. Brandt Stanford University
Heather L. MacLean
Heather L. MacLean University of Toronto
Julian R. Jones
Julian R. Jones Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Engineering and Technology can open doors to a variety of related fields and flexible career pathways. Many students consider combining their technical skills with knowledge in other areas to broaden their professional options.

For those interested in management roles within hospitality, pursuing a hotel and restaurant management degree online can be a smart choice. This pathway merges business skills with service industry know-how, suiting those who want leadership roles in hotels or restaurants.

Business-minded students may gravitate towards an online MBA, and options such as the cheapest aacsb online mba no gmat offer quality education with added affordability and flexibility—perfect for those with a technical undergraduate background.

The legal sector also remains a strong option for tech-focused individuals. Completing an aba-approved online paralegal programs can provide the necessary credentials to work in corporate law, intellectual property, or compliance.

Finally, integrating people management skills through the cheapest online human resources degree gives engineers and technology graduates an edge where people, process, and technology intersect—ideal for HR or tech recruitment roles.

Best Scientists Citing Marcelle McManus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles