World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 35 6737 3271 179 5367

Marc J. Schniederjans publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marc J. Schniederjans between 1978 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marc J. Schniederjans published across 43 years, from 1978 to 2020, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2004. 2 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2004. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 10 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 11 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 10 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication
1978 2020

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marc J. Schniederjans: publications per year, 1978 to 2020
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 1
1980 1
1981 0
1982 5
1983 4
1984 4
1985 10
1986 4
1987 2
1988 0
1989 6
1990 3
1991 6
1992 2
1993 5
1994 4
1995 8
1996 4
1997 1
1998 0
1999 3
2000 5
2001 1
2002 1
2003 4
2004 24
2005 6
2006 6
2007 2
2008 1
2009 11
2010 8
2011 3
2012 5
2013 12
2014 1
2015 10
2016 2
2017 5
2018 8
2019 1
2020 1
Total 191
Download as CSV

Marc J. Schniederjans publications per year - data summary

  • Marc J. Schniederjans, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Nebraska–Lincoln, has 191 publications recorded across 43 years, from 1978 to 2020.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1978 and the most recent to 2020.
  • The most productive year is 2004, with 24 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1978, 1979, 1980, 1997 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 43 years in the span carry no publications at all (1981, 1988 and 1998).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.8 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2016-2020) hold 17 publications, 9% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1978-1992: 49 publications (3.3 per year); 1993-2007: 74 publications (4.9 per year); 2008-2020: 68 publications (5.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Marc J. Schniederjans publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc J. Schniederjans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–183 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 179 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313 179
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Marc J. Schniederjans publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Marc J. Schniederjans, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Nebraska–Lincoln, records 179 publications - the 56th percentile of the discipline.
  • 56% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Marc J. Schniederjans, and about 44% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Marc J. Schniederjans ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Marc J. Schniederjans D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc J. Schniederjans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243 35
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Marc J. Schniederjans D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Marc J. Schniederjans, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Nebraska–Lincoln, records 35 D-Index - the 16th percentile of the discipline.
  • 16% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Marc J. Schniederjans, and about 84% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Marc J. Schniederjans ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute

Overview

Marc J. Schniederjans was affiliated with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the United States. Their research spanned multiple fields centered on medicine, health professions, and neuroscience, with specific focus areas including psychiatry and mental health, emergency medical services, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist contributed to topics related to epilepsy research and treatment, healthcare operations and scheduling optimization, as well as EEG and brain-computer interfaces. These areas reflect a combination of clinical and operational research interests.

Marc J. Schniederjans published in venues such as the International Journal of Business Analytics. One notable publication was titled Optimization of Epilepsy Program Procedures With Linear Programming, released in 2020 in the International Journal of Business Analytics.

Collaborations featured several frequent coauthors, including Deepak Madhavan and Dara G. Schniederjans.

Marc J. Schniederjans was recognized as a Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute.

  • International Journal of Business Analytics

  • Optimization of Epilepsy Program Procedures With Linear Programming (2020, International Journal of Business Analytics)

  • Deepak Madhavan
  • Dara G. Schniederjans

  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

  • Medicine
  • Health Professions
  • Neuroscience

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute

Best Publications

  • Supply chain innovation and organizational performance in the healthcare industry

    Sang M. Lee;DonHee Lee;Marc J. Schniederjans

  • A comparison between Fama and French's model and artificial neural networks in predicting the Chinese stock market

    Qing Cao;Karyl B. Leggio;Marc J. Schniederjans

  • USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS AND MULTI-OBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING FOR THE SELECTION OF COST DRIVERS IN ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING

    Marc J. Schniederjans;Tim Garvin

  • Information Technology Investment: Decision-Making Methodology

    Marc J. Schniederjans;Jamie L. Hamaker;Ashlyn M. Schniederjans

  • Enhancing financial performance with social media: An impression management perspective

    Dara Schniederjans;Edita S. Cao;Marc Schniederjans

  • Outsourcing and Insourcing in an International Context

    Marc J Schniederjans;Ashlyn M Schniederjans;Dara G Schniederjans

  • Using the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for information system project selection

    Marc J. Schniederjans;Rick L. Wilson

  • Implementing enterprise resource planning systems with total quality control and business process reengineering

    Marc J. Schniederjans;Gyu C. Kim

  • The effects of organizational culture and environmental pressures on IT project performance: A moderation perspective

    Vicky Ching Gu;James J. Hoffman;Qing Cao;Marc J. Schniederjans

  • U-shaped assembly line layouts and their impact on labor productivity: An experimental study

    Gerald R. Aase;John R. Olson;Marc J. Schniederjans

  • Linear goal programming

    Marc J. Schniederjans

  • Topics in just-in-time management

    Marc J. Schniederjans

  • A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO THE OUTSOURCING-INSOURCING DECISION IN AN INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT

    Marc J. Schniederjans;Kathryn M. Zuckweiler

  • Neural Network Earnings per Share Forecasting Models: A Comparative Analysis of Alternative Methods

    Wei Zhang;Qing Cao;Marc J. Schniederjans

  • Alignment of operations strategy, information strategic orientation, and performance: an empirical study

    M. Schniederjans;Q. Cao

  • The role of personality in Web-based distance education courses

    Eyong B. Kim;Marc J. Schniederjans

  • A goal programming model to optimize departmental preference in course assignments

    Marc J. Schniederjans;Gyu Chan Kim

  • e-Commerce operations management

    Marc J. Schniederjans;Qing Cao

  • Relationship of Student Undergraduate Achievement and Personality Characteristics in a Total Web‐Based Environment: An Empirical Study

    Marc J. Schniederjans;Eyong B. Kim

  • A multi-objective constrained resource information system project selection method

    Marc J. Schniederjans;Radhika Santhanam

  • Outsourcing Management Information Systems

    Marc J. Schniederjans

Frequent Co-Authors

Sang M. Lee
Sang M. Lee University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Lein Harn
Lein Harn University of Missouri–Kansas City
Dijiang Huang
Dijiang Huang Arizona State University
Deep Medhi
Deep Medhi National Science Foundation
Richard Schonberger
Richard Schonberger University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Michelle L. Pantoya
Michelle L. Pantoya Texas Tech University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens diverse career pathways in counseling, psychology, social work, and family therapy. Students increasingly prefer online programs for their flexibility and accessibility.

For those seeking licensure as professional counselors, selecting cacrep accredited programs ensures recognized, high-quality training. Those focused on strengthening family dynamics can consider mft masters programs, which prepare graduates to support couples and families through complex challenges.

Students interested in understanding human behavior may pursue the most affordable online psychology degree. This option can be ideal for careers in mental health, research, or education. Meanwhile, aspiring social workers seeking a smooth admissions process should explore the msw online programs that offer accessible entry points.

Each of these online degrees can lead to rewarding and impactful roles in communities, and choosing the right program is a key step toward your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Marc J. Schniederjans

Recently Published Articles