World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
7909
World Ranking
8490
National Ranking
4545

Lynn P. Rehm publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn P. Rehm sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lynn P. Rehm D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn P. Rehm sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lynn P. Rehm was affiliated with the University of Houston in the United States. Their academic career was marked by contributions to research and scholarship associated with this institution.

Throughout their career, Lynn P. Rehm did not have publicly documented recent papers, frequent collaborators, or commonly associated publication venues based on the available data. Similarly, no specific fields of study, subfields, or research topics have been detailed in the accessible records related to their scholarly output.

No information is available about books published, awards received, or notable honors attributed to Lynn P. Rehm. The absence of identified research papers, topics, and coauthor networks limits the ability to outline particular themes or domains central to their work.

The data indicates that Lynn P. Rehm is deceased. Their academic contributions remain part of the institutional history of the University of Houston and reflect a professional record anchored to this affiliation.

Best Publications

  • A self-control model of depression

    Lynn P. Rehm

  • A Cube Model for Competency Development: Implications for Psychology Educators and Regulators

    Emil Rodolfa;Russ Bent;Elena Eisman;Paul Nelson

  • Social-cognitive and cognitive correlates of depression in children

    Nadine J. Kaslow;Lynn P. Rehm;Alexander W. Siegel

  • Predicting depressive symptomatology: cognitive-behavioral models and postpartum depression.

    Michael W. O'Hara;Lynn P. Rehm;Susan B. Campbell

  • Postpartum depression. A role for social network and life stress variables.

    Michael W. O'Hara;Lynn P. Rehm;Susan B. Campbell

  • A Self-Control Behavior Therapy Program for Depression.

    Carilyn Z. Fuchs;Lynn P. Rehm

  • Family interaction patterns and childhood depression.

    David A. Cole;Lynn P. Rehm

  • On the AHCPR Depression in Primary Care guidelines: Further considerations for practitioners.

    Ricardo F. Muñoz;Steven D. Hollon;Ellen McGrath;Lynn P. Rehm

  • Reduction of social anxiety through modification of self-reinforcement: An instigation therapy technique.

    Unknown

  • A self-control behavior therapy program for depression.

    Unknown

  • Attributional style and self-control behavior in depressed and nondepressed children and their parents.

    Nadine J. Kaslow;Lynn P. Rehm;Stephen L. Pollack;Alexander W. Siegel

  • Item characteristics of the hamilton rating scale for depression

    Lynn P. Rehm;Michael W. O'Hara

  • Empirically Supported Treatments: Implications for Training

    Karen S. Calhoun;Karla Moras;Paul A. Pilkonis;Lynn P. Rehm

  • Depressive Affect: A Test of Behavioral Hypotheses.

    Albert E. Wener;Lynn P. Rehm

  • Relationships among self-monitoring processes, memory, and depression

    David Roth;Lynn P. Rehm

  • A comparison of self-control and assertion skills treatment of depression

    Lynn P. Rehm;Carilyn Z. Fuchs;David M. Roth;Sander J. Kornblith

  • The empirical status of melancholia: implications for psychology.

    Adam M. Leventhal;Lynn P. Rehm

  • The contribution of self-reinforcement training and behavioral assignments to the efficacy of self-control therapy for depression

    Sander J. Kornblith;Lynn P. Rehm;Michael W. O'Hara;Danuta M. Lamparski

  • Behavior therapy for depression : present status and future directions

    Lynn P. Rehm

  • International Association of Applied Psychology

    Lynn P. Rehm

  • Response to treatments for depression: The role of initial status on targeted cognitive and behavioral skills

    Stephanie S. Rude;Lynn P. Rehm

  • On the AHCPR depression in primary care guidelines. Further considerations for practitioners. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.AHCPR.

    Muñoz Rf;Hollon Sd;McGrath E;Rehm Lp

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael W. O'Hara
Michael W. O'Hara University of Iowa
Susan B. Campbell
Susan B. Campbell University of Pittsburgh
Nadine J. Kaslow
Nadine J. Kaslow Emory University
Steven D. Hollon
Steven D. Hollon Vanderbilt University
Ricardo F. Muñoz
Ricardo F. Muñoz Palo Alto University
Alice S. Carter
Alice S. Carter University of Massachusetts Boston
Adam M. Leventhal
Adam M. Leventhal University of Southern California
Karen S. Calhoun
Karen S. Calhoun University of Georgia
John R. Hughes
John R. Hughes University of Vermont
David A. Cole
David A. Cole Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up a range of career options, from counseling and social work to research and human resources. One of the most important factors students consider is affordability. With a growing number of accredited online psychology programs across the U.S., finding an education that fits your budget is more accessible than ever.

For students in the Midwest, the most affordable psychology degree programs in Minneapolis and the cheapest psychology degrees in Missouri offer strong options with flexible study modes. If you’re considering the South, check out the cheapest psychology degrees in North Carolina for some of the best bargains that don’t compromise on quality.

Urban centers are not left behind—aspiring psychologists can explore the most affordable psychology degree programs in New York City, benefitting from the city’s diverse academic environment. By comparing different programs, you can find online pathways that lead to rewarding psychology careers while keeping tuition costs manageable.

Best Scientists Citing Lynn P. Rehm

Recently Published Articles