World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
69
Citations
30838
World Ranking
2575
National Ranking
1216

Lisa M. Monteggia publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Monteggia sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 175 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Lisa M. Monteggia D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Monteggia sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lisa M. Monteggia is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in neuroscience and related fields. Their work spans several interconnected disciplines, including Neuroscience, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Biological Psychiatry, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's research topics cover a broad range within neuroscience and neuropharmacology, emphasizing the treatment of major depression, the role of tryptophan in brain disorders, nerve injury and regeneration, cellular transport and secretion, genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, and mechanisms of neurogenesis and neuroplasticity.

Recent publications illustrate their focus:

  • "BDNF signaling in context: From synaptic regulation to psychiatric disorders" (2021) in Cell
  • "Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Signaling in Depression and Antidepressant Action" (2021) in Biological Psychiatry
  • "Targeting Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity for Treatment of Mood Disorders" (2020) in Neuron
  • "Ketamine and rapid antidepressant action: new treatments and novel synaptic signaling mechanisms" (2023) in Neuropsychopharmacology
  • "Sustained effects of rapidly acting antidepressants require BDNF-dependent MeCP2 phosphorylation" (2021) in Nature Neuroscience

The scientist's frequent co-authors include Ege T. Kavalali, Ji-Woon Kim, Michelle K. Piazza, Kanzo Suzuki, and Zhenzhong Ma.

Their research has been published across a variety of venues, notably Neuropsychopharmacology, Cell Reports, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Neuron, and STAR Protocols.

Best Publications

  • Neurobiology of depression.

    Eric J. Nestler;Michel Barrot;Ralph J. DiLeone;Amelia J. Eisch

  • A neurotrophic model for stress-related mood disorders.

    Ronald S. Duman;Lisa M. Monteggia

  • Essential Role of BDNF in the Mesolimbic Dopamine Pathway in Social Defeat Stress

    Olivier Berton;Colleen A. McClung;Ralph J. DiLeone;Vaishnav Krishnan

  • NMDA receptor blockade at rest triggers rapid behavioural antidepressant responses

    Anita E. Autry;Megumi Adachi;Elena D Nosyreva;Elisa S. Na

  • Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Neuropsychiatric Disorders

    Anita E. Autry;Lisa M. Monteggia

  • BDNF - a key transducer of antidepressant effects.

    Carl Björkholm;Lisa M. Monteggia

  • Essential role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in adult hippocampal function

    Lisa M. Monteggia;Michel Barrot;Craig M. Powell;Olivier Berton

  • BDNF signaling in context: From synaptic regulation to psychiatric disorders

    Unknown

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor conditional knockouts show gender differences in depression-related behaviors.

    Lisa M. Monteggia;Bryan Luikart;Michel Barrot;David Theobold

  • Relationship of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Its Receptor TrkB to Altered Inhibitory Prefrontal Circuitry in Schizophrenia

    Takanori Hashimoto;Sarah E. Bergen;Quyen L. Nguyen;Baoji Xu

  • Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Signaling in Depression and Antidepressant Action.

    Eero Castrén;Lisa M. Monteggia

  • Selective loss of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the dentate gyrus attenuates antidepressant efficacy.

    Megumi Adachi;Michel Barrot;Anita E. Autry;David Theobald

  • Long-term behavioural and molecular alterations associated with maternal separation in rats

    Melanie Lippmann;Aaron Bress;Charles B. Nemeroff;Paul M. Plotsky

  • mTOR complexes in neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders

    Mauro Costa-Mattioli;Lisa M Monteggia

  • Induction of ΔFosB in Reward-Related Brain Structures after Chronic Stress

    Linda I. Perrotti;Yuki Hadeishi;Paula G. Ulery;Michel Barrot;Michel Barrot

  • Extinction-induced upregulation in AMPA receptors reduces cocaine-seeking behaviour

    Michael A. Sutton;Eric F. Schmidt;Kwang Ho Choi;Christina A. Schad

  • MEF2C, a transcription factor that facilitates learning and memory by negative regulation of synapse numbers and function

    Ana C. Barbosa;Mi Sung Kim;Mert Ertunc;Megumi Adachi

  • Acute Suppression of Spontaneous Neurotransmission Drives Synaptic Potentiation

    Elena Nosyreva;Kristen Szabla;Anita E. Autry;Alexey G. Ryazanov

  • Synaptic mechanisms underlying rapid antidepressant action of ketamine.

    Ege T. Kavalali;Lisa M. Monteggia

  • Postnatal loss of methyl-CpG binding protein 2 in the forebrain is sufficient to mediate behavioral aspects of Rett syndrome in mice.

    Terry Gemelli;Olivier Berton;Erika D. Nelson;Linda I. Perrotti

  • Activity-Dependent Suppression of Miniature Neurotransmission through the Regulation of DNA Methylation

    Erika D. Nelson;Ege T. Kavalali;Lisa M. Monteggia

Frequent Co-Authors

Ege T. Kavalali
Ege T. Kavalali Vanderbilt University
Eric J. Nestler
Eric J. Nestler Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Michel Barrot
Michel Barrot Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
David W. Self
David W. Self The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Ralph J. DiLeone
Ralph J. DiLeone Yale University
Rachael L. Neve
Rachael L. Neve Harvard University
David A. Lewis
David A. Lewis University of Pittsburgh
William A. Carlezon
William A. Carlezon Harvard University
Ronald S. Duman
Ronald S. Duman Yale University
John H. Krystal
John H. Krystal Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience in the USA can open doors to various rewarding career opportunities, both in research and clinical practice. Many students consider advancing their expertise with graduate programs, such as online psyd programs accredited by apa, which are ideal for those aiming to work in clinical psychology or research-focused roles. These programs often provide flexibility for working professionals and ensure robust training standards.

If you are interested in counseling, marriage, and family therapy, options like an mft program allow you to specialize further and enter the growing field of mental health support.

For those looking to fast-track their education, accelerated bachelors degrees can help you complete your studies more quickly and enter the workforce sooner. When choosing an academic path, it is also wise to consider future earnings; you can research some of the highest earning degrees to inform your decision and long-term career planning.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa M. Monteggia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles