World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
43
Citations
8273
World Ranking
5266
National Ranking
1802

Lawrence J. Weider publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence J. Weider sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 103 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Lawrence J. Weider D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence J. Weider sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence J. Weider is affiliated with the University of Oklahoma in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science with significant contributions in related subfields such as environmental chemistry, ecology, genetics, nature and landscape conservation, and plant science.

The scientist has contributed to studies across several main topics, including:

  • Aquatic ecosystems and phytoplankton dynamics
  • Fish ecology and management studies
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Evolution and genetic dynamics
  • Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Wildlife ecology and conservation
  • Animal ecology and behavior studies

Lawrence J. Weider's publications appear in a range of scientific journals and venues, with notable frequent publication sites such as:

  • Molecular Ecology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Fundamental and Applied Limnology / Archiv für Hydrobiologie
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Nature Communications

Some recent papers by Weider include:

  • High genomic diversity in the bank vole at the northern apex of a range expansion: The role of multiple colonizations and end-glacial refugia (2020, Molecular Ecology)
  • Resurrection genomics provides molecular and phenotypic evidence of rapid adaptation to salinization in a keystone aquatic species (2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • The roles of recombination and selection in shaping genomic divergence in an incipient ecological species complex (2022, Molecular Ecology)
  • Local adaptation and future climate vulnerability in a wild rodent (2023, Nature Communications)
  • Quantitative genetics of phosphorus content in the freshwater herbivore, Daphnia pulicaria (2020, Journal of Animal Ecology)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with coauthors including Matthew J. Wersebe, Emily L. Kiehnau, Silvia Marková, Michaela Horníková, and Hayley C. Lanier. Matthew J. Wersebe in particular appears as a common collaborator on various projects.

Best Publications

  • Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems.

    James Elser;R. W. Sterner;E. Gorokhova;W. F. Fagan

  • Rapid evolution revealed by dormant eggs

    Nelson G. Hairston;Winfried Lampert;Carla E. Cáceres;Cami L. Holtmeier

  • NATURAL SELECTION FOR GRAZER RESISTANCE TO TOXIC CYANOBACTERIA: EVOLUTION OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY?

    N. G. Hairston Jr.;C. L. Holtmeier;W. Lampert;L. J. Weider

  • Impacts of nitrogen and phosphorus: from genomes to natural ecosystems and agriculture

    Maïté S. Guignard;Andrew R. Leitch;Claudia Acquisti;Christophe Eizaguirre

  • A millennial-scale chronicle of evolutionary responses to cultural eutrophication in Daphnia.

    Dagmar Frisch;Philip K. Morton;Priyanka Roy Chowdhury;Billy W. Culver

  • Measurement of the carbon balance in Daphnia

    Michael Lynch;Lawrence J. Weider;Winfried Lampert

  • Plasticity of Daphnia life histories in response to chemical cues from predators

    Lawrence J. Weider;Joanna Pijanowska

  • A new approach to historical reconstruction: Combining descriptive and experimental paleolimnology

    W. Charles Kerfoot;John A. Robbins;Lawrence J. Weider

  • The Functional Significance of Ribosomal (r)DNA Variation: Impacts on the Evolutionary Ecology of Organisms

    Lawrence J. Weider;James J. Elser;Teresa J. Crease;Mariana Mateos

  • Phylogenetics and evolution of a circumarctic species complex (Cladocera: Daphnia pulex)

    J. K. Colbourne;T. J. Crease;L. J. Weider;P. D. N. Hebert

  • CLONAL-DIVERSITY PATTERNS AND BREEDING-SYSTEM VARIATION IN DAPHNIA PULEX, AN ASEXUAL-SEXUAL COMPLEX

    Paul D. N. Hebert;Robert D. Ward;Lawrence J. Weider

  • Genome streamlining and the elemental costs of growth

    Dag O. Hessen;Punidan D. Jeyasingh;Maurine Neiman;Lawrence J. Weider

  • Long-term genetic shifts in a microcrustacean egg bank associated with anthropogenic changes in the Lake Constance ecosystem

    Lawrence J. Weider;Winfried Lampert;Martin Wessels;John K. Colbourne

  • Alternative antipredator defences and genetic polymorphism in a pelagic predator–prey system

    Luc De Meester;Lawrence J. Weider;Ralph Tollrian

  • Ecological and Physiological Differentiation Among Low‐Artic Clones of Daphnia Pulex

    Lawrence J. Weider;Paul D. N. Hebert

  • Differential response of Daphnia genotypes to oxygen stress: respiration rates, hemoglobin content and low-oxygen tolerance

    Lawrence J. Weider;Winfried Lampert

  • Experimental paleoecology (resurrection ecology): Chasing Van Valen's Red Queen hypothesis

    W. Charles Kerfoot;Lawrence J. Weider

  • The evolutionary time machine: using dormant propagules to forecast how populations can adapt to changing environments

    Luisa Orsini;Luisa Orsini;Klaus Schwenk;Luc De Meester;John Kenneth Colbourne

  • HOLARCTIC PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF AN ASEXUAL SPECIES COMPLEX I. MITOCHONDRIAL DNA VARIATION IN ARCTIC DAPHNIA.

    Lawrence J. Weider;Anders Hobæk;John K. Colbourne;Teresa J. Crease

  • The evolution of salinity tolerance in Daphnia: a functional genomics approach.

    Leigh C. Latta;Lawrence J. Weider;John K. Colbourne;Michael E. Pfrender

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul D. N. Hebert
Paul D. N. Hebert University of Guelph
John K. Colbourne
John K. Colbourne University of Birmingham
James J. Elser
James J. Elser University of Montana
Luc De Meester
Luc De Meester Freie Universität Berlin
Dag O. Hessen
Dag O. Hessen University of Oslo
Winfried Lampert
Winfried Lampert Max Planck Society
Joachim Mergeay
Joachim Mergeay Research Institute for Nature and Forest
Jotaro Urabe
Jotaro Urabe Tohoku University
Kumud Acharya
Kumud Acharya Desert Research Institute
Erik Jeppesen
Erik Jeppesen Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can lead to diverse career opportunities, especially as the demand for science and healthcare expertise continues to grow. Many students choose to build a unique academic path by pairing their science education with healthcare-related online degrees.

For those interested in blending environmental sciences with patient care, nursing career pathways offer flexible options. Online programs now make it easier to upskill or move into advanced practice roles. For example, prospective students curious about educational timelines may want to explore how to become a np, while registered nurses looking to advance quickly can research the shortest rn to bsn program available online.

Ambitious professionals with an associate degree can bridge directly to advanced nursing specialties through programs like the adn to np pathway. Exploring salary outcomes for high-demand roles is also important; check out the latest data on a dnp psychiatric nurse practitioner salary by state to better understand potential earnings.

These educational and career pathways not only provide flexibility but also allow for interdisciplinary expertise—an asset in today's competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence J. Weider

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles