World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 42 7645 7053 580 535 64 7073

Kwangwook Cho publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kwangwook Cho between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kwangwook Cho published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2012. 5 of the 72 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2012. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 5 publications
1999 2025

72 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kwangwook Cho: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 2
2001 3
2002 2
2003 2
2004 2
2005 0
2006 4
2007 2
2008 4
2009 3
2010 4
2011 3
2012 7
2013 2
2014 2
2015 3
2016 4
2017 4
2018 2
2019 1
2020 4
2021 4
2022 1
2023 1
2024 0
2025 5
Total 72
Download as CSV

Kwangwook Cho publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kwangwook Cho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 58–67 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 64 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193 64
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Kwangwook Cho D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kwangwook Cho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467 42
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Kwangwook Cho is a researcher affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their primary fields of study encompass Neuroscience, Medicine, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. The research focus extends into specialized subfields including Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Neurology, and Biomedical Engineering.

Their work mainly addresses significant topics such as Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology research, Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration mechanisms, Ultrasound and Hyperthermia applications, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment research, Nuclear Receptors and Signaling, and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling.

Recent publications by Kwangwook Cho include:

  • "Beta amyloid aggregates induce sensitised TLR4 signalling causing long-term potentiation deficit and rat neuronal cell death" (2020, Communications Biology)
  • "Emerging insights into synapse dysregulation in Alzheimer's disease" (2022, Brain Communications)
  • "M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor dysfunction in moderate Alzheimer's disease pathology" (2020, Brain Communications)
  • "Regulation of Synapse Weakening through Interactions of the Microtubule Associated Protein Tau with PACSIN1" (2021, Journal of Neuroscience)
  • "The Anti-diabetic Drug Gliquidone Modulates Lipopolysaccharide-Mediated Microglial Neuroinflammatory Responses by Inhibiting the NLRP3 Inflammasome" (2021, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience)

Kwangwook Cho has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Brain Communications
  • Communications Biology
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Acta Neuropathologica Communications
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

The researcher collaborates regularly with several co-authors who have contributed to multiple studies together. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Scott J. Mitchell
  • Jee Hyun Yi
  • Seung Chan Kim
  • Daniel J. Whitcomb
  • Saviana Antonella Barbati

Best Publications

  • Caspase-3 Activation via Mitochondria Is Required for Long-Term Depression and AMPA Receptor Internalization

    Zheng Li;Jihoon Jo;Jie-Min Jia;Shih-Ching Lo

  • Chronic 'jet lag' produces temporal lobe atrophy and spatial cognitive deficits.

    Kwangwook Cho

  • Aβ 1–42 inhibition of LTP is mediated by a signaling pathway involving caspase-3, Akt1 and GSK-3β

    Jihoon Jo;Daniel J Whitcomb;Kimberly Moore Olsen;Talitha L Kerrigan

  • Microtubule-associated protein tau is essential for long-term depression in the hippocampus

    Tetsuya Kimura;Daniel J. Whitcomb;Jihoon Jo;Philip Regan

  • Synaptic Accumulation of PSD-95 and Synaptic Function Regulated by Phosphorylation of Serine-295 of PSD-95

    Myung Jong Kim;Kensuke Futai;Jihoon Jo;Yasunori Hayashi

  • The JAK/STAT Pathway Is Involved in Synaptic Plasticity

    Céline S. Nicolas;Stéphane Peineau;Stéphane Peineau;Stéphane Peineau;Mascia Amici;Zsolt Csaba;Zsolt Csaba

  • Cholinergic Neurotransmission Is Essential for Perirhinal Cortical Plasticity and Recognition Memory

    E.Clea Warburton;Timothy Koder;Kwangwook Cho;Peter V Massey

  • Chronic Jet Lag Produces Cognitive Deficits

    Unknown

  • Altered Hippocampal Synaptic Potentiation in P2X4 Knock-Out Mice

    Joan A. Sim;Severine Chaumont;Jihoon Jo;Lauriane Ulmann

  • Tau phosphorylation at serine 396 residue is required for hippocampal LTD

    Philip Regan;Thomas Piers;Jee-Hyun Yi;Dong-Hyun Kim

  • A pivotal role of GSK-3 in synaptic plasticity

    Clarrisa A. Bradley;Stéphane Peineau;Stéphane Peineau;Changiz Taghibiglou;Celine S. Nicolas

  • An experimental test of the role of postsynaptic calcium levels in determining synaptic strength using perirhinal cortex of rat

    K. Cho;John Patrick Aggleton;M. W. Brown;Z. I. Bashir

  • A new form of long-term depression in the perirhinal cortex

    K. Cho;N. Kemp;J. Noel;J. Noel;John Patrick Aggleton

  • Activation of muscarinic receptors induces protein synthesis‐dependent long‐lasting depression in the perirhinal cortex

    Peter V Massey;G Bhabra;K Cho;M W Brown

  • Regulation of Synaptic Rac1 Activity, Long-Term Potentiation Maintenance, and Learning and Memory by BCR and ABR Rac GTPase-Activating Proteins

    Daeyoung Oh;Seungnam Han;Jinsoo Seo;Jae Ran Lee

  • An Activity-Regulated microRNA, miR-188, Controls Dendritic Plasticity and Synaptic Transmission by Downregulating Neuropilin-2

    Kihwan Lee;Joung Hun Kim;Oh Bin Kwon;Kyongman An

  • Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor-Mediated LTD Involves Two Interacting Ca2+ Sensors, NCS-1 and PICK1

    Jihoon Jo;Seok Heon;Myung Jong Kim;Gi Hoon Son

  • Intracellular oligomeric amyloid-beta rapidly regulates GluA1 subunit of AMPA receptor in the hippocampus

    Daniel J. Whitcomb;Ellen L. Hogg;Philip Regan;Thomas Piers

  • Muscarinic receptors induce LTD of NMDAR EPSCs via a mechanism involving hippocalcin, AP2 and PSD-95

    Jihoon Jo;Gi Hoon Son;Bryony Laura Winters;Myung Jong Kim

  • Ultradian corticosterone secretion is maintained in the absence of circadian cues.

    Eleanor J. Waite;Mervyn McKenna;Yvonne Kershaw;Jamie J. Walker

  • Acute stress causes rapid synaptic insertion of Ca2+ -permeable AMPA receptors to facilitate long-term potentiation in the hippocampus.

    Garry Whitehead;Jihoon Jo;Jihoon Jo;Ellen L. Hogg;Thomas Piers;Thomas Piers

  • Human ProNGF: biological effects and binding profiles at TrkA, P75NTR and sortilin.

    Oliver Clewes;Mark S Fahey;Sue J Tyler;Judy J Watson

Frequent Co-Authors

Graham L. Collingridge
Graham L. Collingridge Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Morgan Sheng
Morgan Sheng Broad Institute
Zafar I. Bashir
Zafar I. Bashir University of Bristol
Eunjoon Kim
Eunjoon Kim Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Bong-Kiun Kaang
Bong-Kiun Kaang Seoul National University
John Patrick Aggleton
John Patrick Aggleton Cardiff University
Zuner A. Bortolotto
Zuner A. Bortolotto University of Bristol
Elek Molnar
Elek Molnar University of Bristol
Malcolm W. Brown
Malcolm W. Brown University of Bristol
Peter St George-Hyslop
Peter St George-Hyslop Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kwangwook Cho

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles