World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
45
Citations
7390
World Ranking
4876
National Ranking
389

Kirsty L. Nash publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kirsty L. Nash sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 84 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Kirsty L. Nash D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kirsty L. Nash sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kirsty L. Nash is affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia and is primarily engaged in research within the field of Environmental Science. Their work encompasses several subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science, and Environmental Engineering.

Their main research topics cover Coastal and Marine Management, Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies, Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact, Marine and Fisheries Research, Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies, Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability, and Environmental Impact and Sustainability.

Recent publications by Nash demonstrate a focus on sustainability, environmental impacts, and the interrelatedness of ecological systems. Some of the recent papers include:

  • The environmental footprint of global food production (2022, Nature Sustainability)
  • Connecting to the oceans: supporting ocean literacy and public engagement (2021, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries)
  • To Achieve a Sustainable Blue Future, Progress Assessments Must Include Interdependencies between the Sustainable Development Goals (2020, One Earth)
  • Food for all: designing sustainable and secure future seafood systems (2021, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries)
  • Time to rethink trophic levels in aquaculture policy (2021, Reviews in Aquaculture)

Kirsty L. Nash frequently publishes in a range of journals, with the highest number of publications appearing in:

  • Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
  • Nature Sustainability
  • One Earth
  • People and Nature
  • Nature Climate Change

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Nash's research. Their frequent co-authors include GT Pecl, Benjamin S. Halpern, Julia L. Blanchard, Jessica A. Gephart, and David Williams. These partnerships appear to contribute to a diverse and multidisciplinary approach to environmental science and sustainability research.

Best Publications

  • The importance of structural complexity in coral reef ecosystems

    N. A. J. Graham;K. L. Nash

  • Harnessing global fisheries to tackle micronutrient deficiencies

    Christina C. Hicks;Christina C. Hicks;Philippa J. Cohen;Philippa J. Cohen;Nicholas A. J. Graham;Nicholas A. J. Graham;Kirsty L. Nash

  • Relationships between structural complexity, coral traits, and reef fish assemblages

    Emily S. Darling;Emily S. Darling;Nicholas A. J. Graham;Nicholas A. J. Graham;Fraser A. Januchowski-Hartley;Kirsty L. Nash

  • Food production shocks across land and sea

    Richard S. Cottrell;Kirsty L. Nash;Benjamin S. Halpern;Benjamin S. Halpern;Tomas A. Remenyi

  • Coral reef recovery dynamics in a changing world

    N. A. J. Graham;K. L. Nash;J. T. Kool;J. T. Kool

  • Linked sustainability challenges and trade-offs among fisheries, aquaculture and agriculture.

    Julia L. Blanchard;Reg A. Watson;Elizabeth A. Fulton;Elizabeth A. Fulton;Richard S. Cottrell

  • Social–environmental drivers inform strategic management of coral reefs in the Anthropocene

    Emily S Darling;Emily S Darling;Emily S Darling;Tim R McClanahan;Joseph Maina;Georgina G Gurney

  • Planetary boundaries for a blue planet.

    Kirsty L. Nash;Kirsty L. Nash;Christopher Cvitanovic;Christopher Cvitanovic;Elizabeth A. Fulton;Elizabeth A. Fulton;Benjamin S. Halpern;Benjamin S. Halpern

  • Connecting to the oceans: supporting ocean literacy and public engagement.

    Rachel Kelly;Karen Evans;Karen Alexander;Karen Alexander;Silvana Bettiol

  • Discontinuities, cross-scale patterns, and the organization of ecosystems

    Kirsty L. Nash;Craig R. Allen;David G. Angeler;Chris Barichievy;Chris Barichievy

  • Herbivore cross‐scale redundancy supports response diversity and promotes coral reef resilience

    Kirsty Nash;Nicholas Anthony James Graham;Simon Jennings;Simon Jennings;Shaun Wilson;Shaun Wilson

  • Cross-scale habitat structure drives fish body size distributions on coral reefs

    Kirsty L. Nash;Nicholas A. J. Graham;Shaun K. Wilson;David R. Bellwood;David R. Bellwood

  • To Achieve a Sustainable Blue Future, Progress Assessments Must Include Interdependencies between the Sustainable Development Goals

    Kirsty L. Nash;Jessica L. Blythe;Christopher Cvitanovic;Christopher Cvitanovic;Christopher Cvitanovic;Elizabeth A. Fulton;Elizabeth A. Fulton

  • Ten tips for developing interdisciplinary socio-ecological researchers

    Rachel Kelly;Mary Mackay;Kirsty L. Nash;Christopher Cvitanovic;Christopher Cvitanovic

  • Home‑range allometry in coral reef fishes: comparison to other vertebrates, methodological issues and management implications

    Kirsty L. Nash;Justin Q. Welsh;Nicholas A. J. Graham;David R. Bellwood

  • A practical framework for implementing and evaluating integrated management of marine activities

    Robert L. Stephenson;Robert L. Stephenson;Alistair J. Hobday;Christopher Cvitanovic;Karen A. Alexander

  • Body size shifts and early warning signals precede the historic collapse of whale stocks.

    Christopher F Clements;Julia L Blanchard;Kirsty L Nash;Mark A Hindell;Mark A Hindell

  • Effect of Macroalgal Expansion and Marine Protected Areas on Coral Recovery Following a Climatic Disturbance

    Shaun K. Wilson;Shaun K. Wilson;Nicholas A. J. Graham;Rebecca Fisher;Jan Robinson

  • Macroalgal herbivory on recovering versus degrading coral reefs

    K. M. Chong-Seng;K. L. Nash;D. R. Bellwood;N. A. J. Graham

  • Ecosystem-based management of coral reefs under climate change.

    Bethany J. Harvey;Kirsty L. Nash;Kirsty L. Nash;Julia L. Blanchard;Julia L. Blanchard;David P. Edwards

  • Prolonged instability prior to a regime shift

    Trisha L. Spanbauer;Craig R. Allen;David G. Angeler;Tarsha Eason

  • Coral reef community composition in the context of disturbance history on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia

    Nicholas A. J. Graham;Karen M. Chong-Seng;Cindy Huchery;Fraser A. Januchowski-Hartley

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas A. J. Graham
Nicholas A. J. Graham Lancaster University
Elizabeth A. Fulton
Elizabeth A. Fulton Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Julia L. Blanchard
Julia L. Blanchard University of Tasmania
Benjamin S. Halpern
Benjamin S. Halpern University of California, Santa Barbara
Shaun K. Wilson
Shaun K. Wilson Australian Institute of Marine Science
Reg Watson
Reg Watson University of Tasmania
Gretta T. Pecl
Gretta T. Pecl University of Tasmania
Ahjond S. Garmestani
Ahjond S. Garmestani Environmental Protection Agency
Craig R. Allen
Craig R. Allen University of Nebraska–Lincoln
David G. Angeler
David G. Angeler Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens the door to a variety of career options that intersect with fields such as social work, psychology, counseling, and forensic studies. For those interested in helping communities or addressing the human dimensions of environmental issues, social work master programs online provide valuable pathways. These programs train graduates to tackle social and ecological challenges in both urban and natural settings.

Understanding the behavioral aspects of humans and wildlife is increasingly important. Pursuing a master psychologie à distance helps graduates analyze both human and animal behavior, which is essential for conservation work. Likewise, those aspiring to support mental wellbeing in contexts affected by ecological changes could consider an accelerated online masters in counseling degree.

Careers in law, enforcement, or research may benefit from expertise in forensic analysis. If you wish to integrate crime scene investigation with ecological expertise, exploring what can i do with a forensic psychology degree can offer unique interdisciplinary opportunities. With flexible online options, these career paths are now more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Kirsty L. Nash

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles