World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
34
Citations
4286
World Ranking
2355
National Ranking
19

Kim Klyver publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim Klyver sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 177 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Kim Klyver D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim Klyver sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Revising entrepreneurial action in response to exogenous shocks: Considering the COVID-19 pandemic

    Ferran Giones;Alexander Brem;Alexander Brem;Jeffrey M. Pollack;Timothy L. Michaelis

  • Influence of social network structure on entrepreneurship participation—A study of 20 national cultures

    Kim Klyver;Kevin Hindle;Denny Meyer

  • Women's self-employment: An act of institutional (dis)integration? A multilevel, cross-country study

    Kim Klyver;Suna Løwe Nielsen;Majbritt Rostgaard Evald

  • Gender differences in entrepreneurial networking and participation

    Kim Klyver;Sharon L. Grant

  • Entrepreneurial network composition: An analysis across venture development stage and gender

    Kim Klyver;Siri A. Terjesen

  • Shifting family involvement during the entrepreneurial process

    Kim Klyver

  • Networking and Culture in Entrepreneurship

    Kim Klyver;Dennis Foley

  • Social support timing and persistence in nascent entrepreneurship: exploring when instrumental and emotional support is most effective

    Kim Klyver;Benson Honig;Benson Honig;Paul Steffens

  • An "Informed" Intent Model: Incorporating Human Capital, Social Capital, and Gender Variables into the Theoretical Model of Entrepreneurial Intentions

    Kevin Hindle;Kim Klyver;Daniel F. Jennings

  • THE CHANGING IMPORTANCE OF THE STRENGTH OF TIES THROUGHOUT THE ENTREPRENEURIAL PROCESS

    Majbritt Rostgaard Evald;Kim Klyver;Susanne Gren Svendsen

  • Exploring the relationship between media coverage and participation in entrepreneurship: Initial global evidence and research implications

    Kevin Hindle;Kim Klyver

  • The Role Of Social Networks At Different Stages Of Business Formation

    Kim Klyver;Kevin Hindle

  • The Context of Social Capital: A Comparison of Rural and Urban Entrepreneurs in Uganda:

    Gerrit Rooks;Kim Klyver;Arthur Sserwanga

  • Entrepreneurship in Theory and Practice: Paradoxes in Play

    Suna Løwe Nielsen;Kim Klyver;Majbritt Rostgaard Evald;Torben Bager

  • The effect of human capital, social capital, and perceptual values on nascent entrepreneurs’ export intentions

    Majbritt Rostgaard Evald;Kim Klyver;Poul Rind Christensen

  • From Resource Access to Use: Exploring the Impact of Resource Combinations on Nascent Entrepreneurship

    Kim Klyver;Mark T. Schenkel

  • Four years on: Are the gazelles still running? A longitudinal study of firm performance after a period of rapid growth

    Martin Senderovitz;Kim Klyver;Paul Steffens

  • Which crisis strategies are (expectedly) effective among SMEs during COVID-19?

    Kim Klyver;Kim Klyver;Suna Løwe Nielsen

  • Collective Efficacy: Linking Paternalistic Leadership to Organizational Commitment

    Ying Chen;Xiaohu Zhou;Kim Klyver;Kim Klyver

  • No particular action needed? A necessary condition analysis of gestation activities and firm emergence

    Pia Arenius;Pia Arenius;Yuval Engel;Kim Klyver

Frequent Co-Authors

Benson Honig
Benson Honig McMaster University
Morten H. Christiansen
Morten H. Christiansen Cornell University
Ralph Hertwig
Ralph Hertwig Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Siri Terjesen
Siri Terjesen Florida Atlantic University
Michael Bang Petersen
Michael Bang Petersen Aarhus University
Denny Meyer
Denny Meyer Swinburne University of Technology
Per Davidsson
Per Davidsson Jönköping University
Michael Lounsbury
Michael Lounsbury University of Alberta
Jeffrey M. Pollack
Jeffrey M. Pollack North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kim Klyver

Recently Published Articles