World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
48
Citations
7582
World Ranking
4655
National Ranking
1335

Khaled A.M. Gasem publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Khaled A.M. Gasem sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 150 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Khaled A.M. Gasem D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Khaled A.M. Gasem sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Khaled A.M. Gasem is affiliated with the University of Wyoming in the United States. Their research primarily spans engineering and chemical engineering, with specific emphasis on interdisciplinary subfields including biomedical engineering, catalysis, mechanical engineering, renewable energy, sustainability and the environment, and materials chemistry.

The main topics covered by their work include:

  • Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
  • Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
  • Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science

Their recent publications reflect these research areas, including:

  • Metal halide perovskites for photocatalysis applications, 2021, Journal of Materials Chemistry A
  • Experimental investigation of CO2 adsorption and desorption on multi-type amines loaded HZSM-5 zeolites, 2020, Chemical Engineering Journal
  • NMR Techniques and Prediction Models for the Analysis of Species Formed in CO2 Capture Processes with Amine-Based Sorbents: A Critical Review, 2020, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
  • Advances in electrocatalytic ammonia synthesis under mild conditions, 2020, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
  • A new approach of reduction of carbon dioxide emission and optimal use of carbon and hydrogen content for the desired syngas production from coal, 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Applied Energy
  • Journal of Materials Chemistry A
  • Chemical Engineering Journal
  • ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
  • Progress in Energy and Combustion Science

The scientist has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Maohong Fan
  • Bang Xu
  • Hertanto Adidharma
  • Morris D. Argyle

Best Publications

  • Extraction of lithium with functionalized lithium ion-sieves

    Xin Xu;Xin Xu;Yongmei Chen;Pingyu Wan;Khaled Gasem

  • High-pressure adsorption of gases on shales: Measurements and modeling

    Pongtorn Chareonsuppanimit;Sayeed A. Mohammad;Robert L. Robinson;Khaled A.M. Gasem

  • Adsorption of Methane, Nitrogen, Carbon Dioxide, and Their Binary Mixtures on Dry Activated Carbon at 318.2 K and Pressures up to 13.6 MPa

    Mahmud Sudibandriyo;Zhejun Pan;James E. Fitzgerald;Robert L. Robinson

  • Adsorption of methane, nitrogen, carbon dioxide and their mixtures on wet Tiffany coal

    J. E. Fitzgerald;Z. Pan;Mahmud Sudibandriyo;R. L. Robinson

  • A modified temperature dependence for the Peng–Robinson equation of state

    K.A.M Gasem;W Gao;Z Pan;R.L Robinson

  • Adsorption of Pure Methane, Nitrogen, and Carbon Dioxide and Their Binary Mixtures on Wet Fruitland Coal

    F.E. Hall;Zhou Chunhe;K.A.M. Gasem;R.L. Robinson

  • An inter-laboratory comparison of CO2 isotherms measured on argonne premium coal samples

    A. L. Goodman;Andreas Busch;G. J. Duffy;J. E. Fitzgerald

  • Equilibrium phase compositions, phase densities, and interfacial tensions for CO sub 2 + hydrocarbon systems; CO sub 2 + n-butane + n-decane

    K.A.M. Gasem;K.B. Dickson;P.B. Dulcamara;N. Nagarajan

  • Modeling the adsorption of pure gases on coals with the SLD model

    J. E. Fitzgerald;Mahmud Sudibandriyo;Z. Pan;R. L. Robinson

  • Modified carbon nanotubes/tetraethylenepentamine for CO2 capture

    Maryam Irani;Andrew T. Jacobson;Khaled A.M. Gasem;Maohong Fan

  • Metal halide perovskites for photocatalysis applications

    Kuankuan Ren;Shizhong Yue;Chunhe Li;Zebo Fang

  • Solubilities of carbon dioxide in heavy normal paraffins (C20−C44) at pressures to 9.6 MPa and temperatures from 323 to 423 K

    Khaled A. M. Gasem;Robert L. Robinson

  • Inter-laboratory comparison II: CO2 isotherms measured on moisture-equilibrated Argonne premium coals at 55 °C and up to 15 MPa

    A. L. Goodman;Andreas Busch;R. M. Bustin;L. Chikatamarla

  • An automated apparatus for equilibrium phase compositions, densities, and interfacial tensions: data for carbon dioxide + decane

    R.D Shaver;R.L Robinson;K.A.M Gasem

  • Predicting Gas Adsorption Using Two-Dimensional Equations of State

    Chunhe Zhou;Freddie Hall;Khaled A. M. Gasem;Robert L. Jr. Robinson

  • Equilibrium phase compositions, phase densities, and interfacial tensions for carbon dioxide + hydrocarbon systems. 5. Carbon dioxide + n-tetradecane

    K. A. M. Gasem;K. B. Dickson;P. B. Dulcamara;N. Nagarajan

  • Modeling High-Pressure Adsorption of Gas Mixtures on Activated Carbon and Coal Using a Simplified Local-Density Model

    James E. Fitzgerald;Robert L. Robinson;Khaled A. M. Gasem

  • Kinetics, thermodynamics, and physical characterization of corn stover (Zea mays) for solar biomass pyrolysis potential analysis.

    Asif Hasan Rony;Lingli Kong;Wenyang Lu;Morteza Dejam

  • Highly selective and stable Cu/SiO2 catalysts prepared with a green method for hydrogenation of diethyl oxalate into ethylene glycol

    Jie Ding;Jie Ding;Tiberiu Popa;Tiberiu Popa;Jinke Tang;Khaled A.M. Gasem

  • Volume-translated Peng–Robinson equation of state for saturated and single-phase liquid densities

    Agelia M. Abudour;Sayeed A. Mohammad;Robert L. Robinson;Khaled A.M. Gasem

  • Experimental Uncertainties in Volumetric Methods for Measuring Equilibrium Adsorption

    Sayeed Mohammad;James Fitzgerald;Robert L. Robinson;Khaled A. M. Gasem

  • Measurements and Modeling of Gas Adsorption on Shales

    Pongtorn Charoensuppanimit;Sayeed A. Mohammad;Khaled A. M. Gasem

  • Solubility of methane in hexane, decane, and dodecane at temperatures from 311 to 423 K and pressures to 10.4 MPa

    Srinivasa Srivastan;Naif A. Darwish;Khaled A. M. Gasem;Robert L. Robinson

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert L. Robinson
Robert L. Robinson Oklahoma State University
Maohong Fan
Maohong Fan University of Wyoming
Zhejun Pan
Zhejun Pan Northeast Petroleum University
Maciej Radosz
Maciej Radosz University of Wyoming
Pingyu Wan
Pingyu Wan Beijing University of Chemical Technology
Angela Goodman
Angela Goodman National Energy Technology Laboratory
Dong Ding
Dong Ding Idaho National Laboratory
Andreas Busch
Andreas Busch Heriot-Watt University
Bernhard M. Krooss
Bernhard M. Krooss RWTH Aachen University
Shiyi Chen
Shiyi Chen Southern University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The USA offers a wide variety of flexible online education options for students eager to launch or advance a career in engineering and technology. Many programs are designed for busy professionals looking for rapid career growth, or for parents seeking better work-life balance.

Accelerated graduate programs, such as a masters in 6 months, can fast-track your expertise and open doors to management or technical leadership roles. For those aiming to quickly boost earning potential without investing years, specialized certificate programs that pay well are widely available, especially in high-demand tech fields.

Online education also fits the needs of working adults and parents, with programs recognized among the best degrees for moms going back to school. These options allow you to study at your own pace while balancing personal commitments.

For those wanting to finish coursework quickly, some colleges offer intensive 6 week college courses that cover critical concepts in a condensed timeline.

Whether you’re seeking a full degree, industry certificate, or short-term skills upgrade, online pathways make engineering and technology education accessible and adaptable to your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Khaled A.M. Gasem

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles