World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Karl V. Voelkerding

Karl V. Voelkerding

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
46
Citations
49363
World Ranking
18803
National Ranking
7679

Karl V. Voelkerding publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karl V. Voelkerding sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 118 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Karl V. Voelkerding D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karl V. Voelkerding sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karl V. Voelkerding is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research specializes in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on Genetics. Other subfields include Cancer Research, Immunology, Molecular Biology, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, notably Genomics and Rare Diseases, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Genetic factors in colorectal cancer, Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, BRCA gene mutations in cancer, Immunotherapy and Immune Responses, and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation.

Frequently published in the journal Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, with five publications, Karl V. Voelkerding has also contributed to UNC Libraries, Journal of Leukocyte Biology, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, and Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Voelkerding include:

  • Laboratory and Clinical Implications of Incidental and Secondary Germline Findings During Tumor Testing, 2021, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
  • Frontline Science: Cxxc5 expression alters cell cycle and myeloid differentiation of mouse hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, 2020, Journal of Leukocyte Biology
  • Creation of an Expert Curated Variant List for Clinical Genomic Test Development and Validation, 2021, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
  • Four-Year Laboratory Performance of the First College of American Pathologists In Silico Next-Generation Sequencing Bioinformatics Proficiency Testing Surveys, 2022, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
  • CXXC5 variant in an immunodeficient patient with a progressive loss of hematopoietic cells, 2020, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

The scientist collaborates frequently with coauthors including Birgit Funke, Avni Santani, Rhona J. Souers, Jaimie Halley, and Madhuri Hegde.

Best Publications

  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

    Sue Richards;Nazneen Aziz;Nazneen Aziz;Sherri Bale;David Bick

  • Next-Generation Sequencing: From Basic Research to Diagnostics

    Karl V. Voelkerding;Shale A. Dames;Jacob D. Durtschi

  • Guidelines for Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Oncology Panels: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology and College of American Pathologists.

    Lawrence J. Jennings;Maria E. Arcila;Christopher Corless;Suzanne Kamel-Reid;Suzanne Kamel-Reid

  • Assuring the quality of next-generation sequencing in clinical laboratory practice

    Amy S Gargis;Lisa Kalman;Meredith W Berry;David P Bick

  • Standards and Guidelines for Validating Next-Generation Sequencing Bioinformatics Pipelines: A Joint Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology and the College of American Pathologists.

    Somak Roy;Christopher Coldren;Arivarasan Karunamurthy;Nefize S. Kip

  • Amplicon DNA Melting Analysis for Mutation Scanning and Genotyping: Cross-Platform Comparison of Instruments and Dyes

    Mark G. Herrmann;Jacob D. Durtschi;L. Kathryn Bromley;Carl T. Wittwer;Carl T. Wittwer

  • High resolution melting applications for clinical laboratory medicine

    Maria Erali;Karl V. Voelkerding;Carl T. Wittwer

  • College of American pathologists' laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing clinical tests

    Nazneen Aziz;Qin Zhao;Lynn Bry;Denise K. Driscoll

  • Germline Mutations in NFKB2 Implicate the Noncanonical NF-κB Pathway in the Pathogenesis of Common Variable Immunodeficiency

    Karin Chen;Emily M. Coonrod;Attila Kumánovics;Attila Kumánovics;Zechariah F. Franks

  • Loss of B Cells in Patients with Heterozygous Mutations in IKAROS

    Hye Sun Kuehn;Bertrand Boisson;Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles;Janine Reichenbach

  • Specific versus Nonspecific Isothermal DNA Amplification through Thermophilic Polymerase and Nicking Enzyme Activities

    Eric Tan;Barbara Erwin;Shale Dames;Tanya Ferguson

  • Expanded Instrument Comparison of Amplicon DNA Melting Analysis for Mutation Scanning and Genotyping

    Mark G. Herrmann;Jacob D. Durtschi;Carl T. Wittwer;Carl T. Wittwer;Karl V. Voelkerding;Karl V. Voelkerding

  • Phevor Combines Multiple Biomedical Ontologies for Accurate Identification of Disease-Causing Alleles in Single Individuals and Small Nuclear Families

    Marc V. Singleton;Stephen L. Guthery;Karl V. Voelkerding;Karin Chen

  • Next Generation Sequencing for Clinical Diagnostics-Principles and Application to Targeted Resequencing for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Paper from the 2009 William Beaumont Hospital Symposium on Molecular Pathology

    Karl V. Voelkerding;Karl V. Voelkerding;Shale Dames;Jacob D. Durtschi

  • Good laboratory practice for clinical next-generation sequencing informatics pipelines

    Amy S. Gargis;Lisa Kalman;David P. Bick;Cristina Da Silva

  • Taxonomer: an interactive metagenomics analysis portal for universal pathogen detection and host mRNA expression profiling.

    Steven Flygare;Keith Simmon;Chase Miller;Yi Qiao

  • Opportunities and challenges associated with clinical diagnostic genome sequencing: a report of the Association for Molecular Pathology.

    Iris Schrijver;Nazneen Aziz;Daniel H. Farkas;Manohar Furtado

  • Unlabeled oligonucleotides as internal temperature controls for genotyping by amplicon melting.

    Michael T. Seipp;Jacob D. Durtschi;Michael A. Liew;Jamie Williams

  • A unified test of linkage analysis and rare-variant association for analysis of pedigree sequence data

    Hao Hu;Jared C Roach;Hilary Coon;Stephen L Guthery

  • Identification of two nuclear subclasses of the adenovirus type 5-encoded DNA-binding protein.

    K Voelkerding;D F Klessig

Frequent Co-Authors

Carl T. Wittwer
Carl T. Wittwer University of Utah
Harry R. Hill
Harry R. Hill University of Sheffield
Birgit Funke
Birgit Funke Harvard University
Heidi L. Rehm
Heidi L. Rehm Brigham and Women's Hospital
Madhuri Hegde
Madhuri Hegde Emory University
Mark Yandell
Mark Yandell University of Utah
Gabor T. Marth
Gabor T. Marth University of Utah
Andrew T. Pavia
Andrew T. Pavia University of Utah
Vijay G. Sankaran
Vijay G. Sankaran Harvard University
Lynn B. Jorde
Lynn B. Jorde University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open up a diverse range of healthcare and science careers. Many students choose to enhance their prospects with specialized training available through flexible online options.

For those interested in technology and diagnostics, online ultrasound tech school programs provide essential skills for imaging and patient care roles. Similarly, advancing into radiologic technology is now more accessible with online rad tech programs, offering affordable routes into a rapidly growing field.

If nutrition and wellness spark your interest, pursuing one of the top dietetics programs in the us can prepare you for expert roles in clinical and community settings. Alternatively, students looking for entry-level positions in healthcare may consider an online medical assisting school with financial aid support.

Exploring these pathways can help you combine your background in Biology or Biochemistry with practical, in-demand skills for a strong start in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Karl V. Voelkerding

Trending Scientists