World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
15972
World Ranking
12989
National Ranking
138

Julie Gehl publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Gehl sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 175 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Julie Gehl D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Gehl sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julie Gehl is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their research spans across multiple domains within medicine and the life sciences, with a primary focus on areas such as biotechnology, oncology, and immunology.

The scientist's work is frequently published in several journals. The venues with the highest number of publications include:

  • Cancers
  • Acta Oncologica
  • European Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Endoscopy International Open
  • BMC Cancer

Their published papers cover a range of topics related to cancer treatment modalities and clinical studies, especially in the field of electroporation-based therapies. Some notable publications include:

  • A Comprehensive Review of Calcium Electroporation-A Novel Cancer Treatment Modality, 2020, Cancers
  • Electrochemotherapy in the treatment of cutaneous malignancy: Outcomes and subgroup analysis from the cumulative results from the pan-European International Network for Sharing Practice in Electrochemotherapy database for 2482 lesions in 987 patients (2008-2019), 2020, European Journal of Cancer
  • Evaluation of Calcium Electroporation for the Treatment of Cutaneous Metastases: A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Phase II Trial, 2020, Cancers
  • Electrochemotherapy for colorectal cancer using endoscopic electroporation: a phase 1 clinical study, 2020, Endoscopy International Open
  • Voluntary wheel running can lead to modulation of immune checkpoint molecule expression, 2020, Acta Oncologica

Julie Gehl's main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these broad fields, their subfields of interest are:

  • Biotechnology
  • Oncology
  • Immunology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cancer Research

The primary topics of focus in their research involve:

  • Microbial Inactivation Methods
  • Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins
  • Transgenic Plants and Applications
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative work include:

  • Mille Vissing
  • L Campana
  • Erika Kis
  • Paolo Matteucci
  • Francesca de Terlizzi

Best Publications

  • High-efficiency gene transfer into skeletal muscle mediated by electric pulses

    Lluis M. Mir;Michel F. Bureau;Julie Gehl;Ravi Rangara

  • Electroporation: theory and methods, perspectives for drug delivery, gene therapy and research

    J. Gehl

  • Electrochemotherapy – An easy, highly effective and safe treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases: Results of ESOPE (European Standard Operating Procedures of Electrochemotherapy) study

    Michel Marty;Gregor Sersa;Jean Rémi Garbay;Julie Gehl

  • Voluntary Running Suppresses Tumor Growth through Epinephrine- and IL-6-Dependent NK Cell Mobilization and Redistribution

    Line Pedersen;Manja Idorn;Gitte H. Olofsson;Britt Lauenborg

  • Standard operating procedures of the electrochemotherapy: Instructions for the use of bleomycin or cisplatin administered either systemically or locally and electric pulses delivered by the CliniporatorTM by means of invasive or non-invasive electrodes

    Lluis M. Mir;Julie Gehl;Gregor Sersa;Christopher G. Collins

  • Electrochemotherapy: results of cancer treatment using enhanced delivery of bleomycin by electroporation

    Anita Gothelf;Lluis M Mir;Julie Gehl

  • Molecular Mechanisms Linking Exercise to Cancer Prevention and Treatment.

    Pernille Hojman;Julie Gehl;Jesper F. Christensen;Bente K. Pedersen

  • In vivo electroporation of skeletal muscle: threshold, efficacy and relation to electric field distribution.

    Julie Gehl;Thyge H. Sørensen;Kurt Nielsen;Povl Raskmark

  • Elevated neutrophil and monocyte counts in peripheral blood are associated with poor survival in patients with metastatic melanoma: a prognostic model

    H H Schmidt;L. Bastholt;P Geertsen;I J Christensen

  • Updated standard operating procedures for electrochemotherapy of cutaneous tumours and skin metastases

    Julie Gehl;Gregor Sersa;Louise Wichmann Matthiessen;Tobian Muir

  • Combined doxorubicin and paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer: Effective and cardiotoxic

    J. Gehl;M. Boesgaard;T. Paaske;B. Vittrup Jensen

  • Importance of association between permeabilization and electrophoretic forces for intramuscular DNA electrotransfer

    M.F. Bureau;J. Gehl;V. Deleuze;L.M. Mir

  • Enhancement of cytotoxicity by electropermeabilization: an improved method for screening drugs.

    Julie Gehl;Torben Skovsgaard;Lluis M Mir

  • Electrochemotherapy: technological advancements for efficient electroporation-based treatment of internal tumors

    Damijan Miklavcic;Gregor Sersa;E. Brecelj;Julie Gehl

  • Vascular reactions to in vivo electroporation: characterization and consequences for drug and gene delivery.

    Julie Gehl;Torben Skovsgaard;Lluis M Mir

  • Electric pulse-mediated gene delivery to various animal tissues.

    Lluis M Mir;Pernille H Moller;Franck André;Julie Gehl

  • Association between interleukin-15 and obesity: interleukin-15 as a potential regulator of fat mass.

    Anders Rinnov Nielsen;Pernille Hojman;Pernille Hojman;Christian Erikstrup;Christian Philip Fischer

  • Efficiency of high- and low-voltage pulse combinations for gene electrotransfer in muscle, liver, tumor, and skin

    Franck Andre;Julie Gehl;Gregor Sersa;Véronique Préat

  • Efficient palliation of haemorrhaging malignant melanoma skin metastases by electrochemotherapy

    J. Gehl;P. F. Geertsen

  • DETERMINATION OF OPTIMAL PARAMETERS FOR IN VIVO GENE TRANSFER BY ELECTROPORATION, USING A RAPID IN VIVO TEST FOR CELL PERMEABILIZATION

    Julie Gehl;Lluis M. Mir

Frequent Co-Authors

Lluis M. Mir
Lluis M. Mir Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Bente Klarlund Pedersen
Bente Klarlund Pedersen University of Copenhagen
Damijan Miklavčič
Damijan Miklavčič University of Ljubljana
Per thor Straten
Per thor Straten University of Copenhagen
Jürgen C. Becker
Jürgen C. Becker University of Duisburg-Essen
Mads Hald Andersen
Mads Hald Andersen Copenhagen University Hospital
Julia S. Johansen
Julia S. Johansen Copenhagen University Hospital
Jens Nielsen
Jens Nielsen Chalmers University of Technology
Marie-Pierre Rols
Marie-Pierre Rols Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Caroline Robert
Caroline Robert University of Paris-Saclay

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens the door to a wide range of online degree programs that prepare you for rewarding careers in healthcare and science. Many students choose to advance their qualifications through accessible online pathways, especially if they're already working or need a flexible study schedule.

If you are interested in mental health care, consider the shortest post master's pmhnp online programs, designed for current nurses who want to specialize as psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners. Those seeking to become family nurse practitioners can explore the fastest post master's fnp certificate options to advance quickly in this thriving field.

Nutrition-focused students aiming for registered dietitian roles can find budget-friendly programs on the online dietitian degree list. Alternatively, working nurses can strengthen their credentials with the best online rn to bsn programs, designed to make earning a Bachelor of Science in Nursing accessible and streamlined.

With these online degree options, you can tailor your academic and professional pathway to your interests—whether in direct healthcare, research, or public wellness.

Best Scientists Citing Julie Gehl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles