World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10968 10265 534 525 168 3829

Julia Schüler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julia Schüler between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julia Schüler published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 10.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2013. 24 of the 273 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2013. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 33 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 19 publications
2001 2025

273 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julia Schüler: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 0
2005 1
2006 0
2007 3
2008 3
2009 12
2010 8
2011 9
2012 11
2013 33
2014 18
2015 20
2016 12
2017 15
2018 21
2019 17
2020 14
2021 20
2022 16
2023 13
2024 5
2025 19
Total 273
Download as CSV

Julia Schüler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Schüler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 168 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 168
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Julia Schüler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Schüler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Wanting, having, and needing : Integrating motive disposition theory and self-determination theory

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Julia Schüler

  • The rewarding effect of flow experience on performance in a marathon race

    Julia Schüler;Sibylle Brunner

  • Implicit need for achievement moderates the relationship between competence need satisfaction and subsequent motivation

    Julia Schüler;Kennon M. Sheldon;Stephanie M. Fröhlich

  • Arousal of Flow Experience in a Learning Setting and Its Effects on Exam Performance and Affect

    Julia Schüler

  • The Struggle of Giving Up Personal Goals Affective, Physiological, and Cognitive Consequences of an Action Crisis

    Veronika Brandstätter;Marcel Herrmann;Julia Schüler

  • Action crisis and cost–benefit thinking: A cognitive analysis of a goal-disengagement phase

    Veronika Brandstätter;Julia Schüler

  • High Boredom Proneness and Low Trait Self-Control Impair Adherence to Social Distancing Guidelines during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Wanja Wolff;Wanja Wolff;Corinna S. Martarelli;Julia Schüler;Maik Bieleke

  • Do implicit motives and basic psychological needs interact to predict well-being and flow? Testing a universal hypothesis and a matching hypothesis

    Julia Schüler;Veronika Brandstätter;Kennon M. Sheldon

  • Avoidance goal pursuit depletes self-regulatory resources.

    Daniela Oertig;Julia Schüler;Jessica Schnelle;Veronika Brandstätter

  • A high implicit affiliation motive does not always make you happy: A corresponding explicit motive and corresponding behavior are further needed

    Julia Schüler;Veronika Job;Stephanie M. Fröhlich;Veronika Brandstätter

  • Achievement incentives determine the effects of achievement-motive incongruence on flow experience.

    Julia Schüler

  • Testing the convergent and discriminant validity of three implicit motive measures: PSE, OMT, and MMG

    Julia Schüler;Veronika Brandstätter;Mirko Wegner;Nicola Baumann

  • Do Some People Need Autonomy More Than Others? Implicit Dispositions Toward Autonomy Moderate the Effects of Felt Autonomy on Well-Being

    Julia Schüler;Kennon M. Sheldon;Mike Prentice;Marc Halusic

  • How basic need satisfaction and dispositional motives interact in predicting flow experience in sport

    Julia Schüler;Veronika Brandstätter

  • Implicit motives and basic need satisfaction in extreme endurance sports

    Julia Schüler;Mirko Wegner;Beat Knechtle

  • Needs, Motives, and Personality Development : Unanswered Questions and Exciting Potentials

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Julia Schüler

  • Written Emotional Expression and Emotional Well-Being: The Moderating Role of Fear of Rejection

    Thomas A. Langens;Julia Schüler

  • Implicit motives and basic psychological needs.

    Julia Schüler;Nicola Baumann;Athanasios Chasiotis;Michael Bender

  • Motivation und Emotion : allgemeine Psychologie für Bachelor

    Veronika Brandstätter;Julia Schüler;Rosa Maria Puca;Ljubica Lozo

  • Increase in prefrontal cortex oxygenation during static muscular endurance performance is modulated by self-regulation strategies

    Wanja Wolff;Maik Bieleke;Anna Hirsch;Christian Wienbruch

Frequent Co-Authors

Veronika Brandstätter
Veronika Brandstätter University of Zurich
Kennon M. Sheldon
Kennon M. Sheldon University of Missouri
Michael Lübbert
Michael Lübbert University of Freiburg
Marie Follo
Marie Follo University of Freiburg
Dietmar Pfeifer
Dietmar Pfeifer University of Freiburg
Thomas Brabletz
Thomas Brabletz University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Sascha Rohn
Sascha Rohn Technical University of Berlin
Urte Scholz
Urte Scholz University of Zurich
Peter M. Gollwitzer
Peter M. Gollwitzer New York University
Andrew J. Elliot
Andrew J. Elliot University of Rochester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Julia Schüler

Recently Published Articles