World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jos M. F. ten Berge

Jos M. F. ten Berge

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
34
Citations
6183
World Ranking
2883
National Ranking
35

Jos M. F. ten Berge publications per year

1977: 2 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 1 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 1 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 1 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 1 publications 2013: 1 publications 2014: 1 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publications
1977 2023

112 publications in total across all disciplines

Jos M. F. ten Berge publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jos M. F. ten Berge sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 107 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Jos M. F. ten Berge D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jos M. F. ten Berge sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jos M. F. ten Berge is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple fields, with primary focus areas in Computer Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. The scientist's work reflects an interdisciplinary approach, integrating methods and applications across diverse domains.

The main fields of study attributed to Jos M. F. ten Berge include:

  • Computer Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within these fields, specific subfields are highlighted that demonstrate the breadth of their research interests. These subfields are:

  • Signal Processing
  • Food Science
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

The scientific topics frequently addressed by Jos M. F. ten Berge encompass both theoretical and applied areas. The main topics of their work are:

  • Blind Source Separation Techniques
  • Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Face and Expression Recognition

Collaboration is evident in their research profile with several frequent co-authors, indicating ongoing working relationships and interdisciplinary projects. These co-authors include:

  • Kohei Adachi
  • Henk A. L. Kiers
  • Takashi Murakami

Best Publications

  • Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity.

    Urbano Lorenzo-Seva;Jos M. F. ten Berge

  • PARAFAC2 : PART I. A DIRECT FITTING ALGORITHM FOR THE PARAFAC2 MODEL

    Henk A. L. Kiers;Jos M. F. ten Berge;Rasmus Bro

  • Orthogonal Procrustes Rotation for Two or More Matrices.

    Jos M. F. Ten Berge

  • The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality

    Jos M. F. Ten Berge;Gregor Sočan

  • Almost sure identifiability of multidimensional harmonic retrieval

    Tao Jiang;N.D. Sidiropoulos;J.M.F. ten Berge

  • A numerical approach to the approximate and the exact minimum rank of a covariance matrix

    Jos M.F. ten Berge;Henk A.L. Kiers

  • Matrix correlation

    J. O. Ramsay;Jos ten Berge;G. P. H. Styan

  • On uniqueness in CANDECOMP/PARAFAC

    Jos M. F. ten Berge;Nikolaos D. Sidiropoulos

  • Some new results on correlation-preserving factor scores prediction methods

    Jos M.F. ten Berge;Wim P. Krijnen;Tom Wansbeek;Alexander Shapiro

  • Statistical inference of minimum rank factor analysis

    Alexander Shapiro;Jos M. F. ten Berge

  • Hierarchical relations between methods for simultaneous component analysis and a technique for rotation to a simple simultaneous structure

    Henk A.L. Kiers;Jos M.F. ten Berge

  • Perceptual Mapping Based on Idiosyncratic Sets of Attributes

    Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp;Hans C.M. Van Trijp;Jos M.F. Ten Berge

  • A family of association coefficients for metric scales

    Frits E. Zegers;Jos M. F. ten Berge

  • Alternating least squares algorithms for simultaneous components analysis with equal component weight matrices in two or more populations

    Henk A. L. Kiers;Jos M. F. ten Berge

  • COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS OF THE GREATEST LOWER BOUND TO THE RELIABILITY AND CONSTRAINED MINIMUM TRACE FACTOR-ANALYSIS

    Jos M. F. ten Berge;Tom A. B. Snijders;Frits E. Zegers

  • Kruskal's polynomial for 2×2×2 arrays and a generalization to 2×n×n arrays

    Jos M. F. ten Berge

  • Sufficient conditions for uniqueness in Candecomp/Parafac and Indscal with random component matrices.

    Alwin Stegeman;Jos M. F. Ten Berge;Lieven De Lathauwer

  • Simplicity of core arrays in three-way principal component analysis and the typical rank of p×q×2 arrays

    Jos M.F. Ten Berge;Henk A.L. Kiers

  • Some additional results on principal components analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithms

    Jos M. F. ten Berge;Jan de Leeuw;Pieter M. Kroonenberg

  • A general solution to Mosier's oblique procrustes problem

    Jos M. F. ten Berge;Klaas Nevels

  • Partial uniqueness in CANDECOMP/PARAFAC

    Jos M. F. ten Berge

Frequent Co-Authors

Henk A. L. Kiers
Henk A. L. Kiers University of Groningen
Alexander Shapiro
Alexander Shapiro Georgia Institute of Technology
Jan de Leeuw
Jan de Leeuw University of California, Los Angeles
Yoshio Takane
Yoshio Takane University of Victoria
Jan Pieter van Oudenhoven
Jan Pieter van Oudenhoven University of Groningen
Tom A. B. Snijders
Tom A. B. Snijders University of Groningen
Rasmus Bro
Rasmus Bro University of Copenhagen
Age K. Smilde
Age K. Smilde University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Mathematics is a foundational discipline that opens doors to numerous career paths, often intersecting with fields like business, marketing, and data science. For students interested in combining quantitative skills with business acumen, pursuing an marketing masters online can be a strategic next step. These programs often emphasize analytics and data-driven decision-making, enhancing your marketability.

If you're seeking advanced business knowledge with a shorter time commitment, many universities now offer 1 year mba options, allowing mathematics graduates to quickly boost their credentials and enter leadership roles.

Moreover, flexibility is key in today’s education landscape. Students may find value in mba programs that accept transfer credits, enabling them to leverage previous coursework and reduce time to degree completion.

For those focused on the growing field of data, the best masters in data analytics programs offer specialized training that builds on mathematical foundations, equipping graduates with skills to handle complex data challenges in various industries.

Best Scientists Citing Jos M. F. ten Berge

Recently Published Articles